Sentences with phrase «allegations against the buyer»

Next, the court considered the allegations against the Buyer's Representative.

Therefore, the court sent the negligent misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary duty allegations against the Buyer's Representative back to the trial court for consideration by a jury.

However, the court found that the Buyer's breach of fiduciary duty and negligent misrepresentation allegations against the Buyer's Representative should have been considered by a jury, and so sent those allegations back to the jury.

He filed a lawsuit against the former owner, the Listing Broker, and the Buyer's Representative alleging fraud and negligent misrepresentation against all the parties, and breach of fiduciary duty allegations against the Buyer's Representative.

The court affirmed the dismissal of the fraud allegations against the Buyer's Representative because the Buyer had not properly plead those allegations.

Next, the court looked at the Buyers» negligent misrepresentation allegations against the Buyer's Representative over her recommendation of the Inspector.

Not exact matches

In response to the lawsuit, the Weinstein Company's board of directors called many of the allegations leveled against them «inaccurate,» and said that «any suggestion that the Company or its Board somehow impeded or discouraged the buyer's access to the New York Attorney General is untrue.»

A separate investigation last week found that Vance's office had been working on a case against Donald Trump, Jr., and Ivanka Trump, over allegations that they deceived potential buyers at Trump SoHo by exaggerating sales figures.

Defended client in real estate dispute against buyer's allegations of fraud and failure to disclose material information.

The Sellers settled their lawsuit with the Buyers, and the trial court dismissed the allegations against the Brokerage and Hopkins.

The Buyer brought a lawsuit against the Developer, claiming that the Developer misrepresented the Neighbor's disruptive behavior and alleged negligent misrepresentation, consumer fraud allegations, and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

In Hagans v. Woodruff, the Court of Appeals of Texas addressed a buyer's allegations of negligent misrepresentation and violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practice Act (DPTA) against a broker.

In Mahler v. Keenan Real Estate, Inc., the Supreme Court of Kansas addressed allegations of fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation by a buyer against a vendor and a brokerage firm.

Prior to severing, the court dismissed some of the Buyers» allegations, and so the only remaining allegations against the Brokerage were antitrust allegations (federal and state) and violations of the state's consumer protection act.

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts addressed allegations by buyers against a vendor bank for fraud and violations of the business practices act.

In Mouning v. Carswell, the Superior Court of Connecticut addressed allegations of fraud, negligence, and breach of contract by a buyer against a broker.

In a case previously summarized in The Letter of the Law, a federal court has considered whether a buyer's allegations could proceed against a listing broker for negligent misrepresentation when the listing broker failed to disclose the presence of lead paint on the property.

A South Carolina court has considered whether a buyer could bring allegations against a seller for alleged misrepresentations made by a real estate professional retained by the seller.

185 DOS 05 DOS v. Britt - disclosure of conditions affecting the value or desirability of listed premises; DOS fails its burden of proof; res judicata; judgment rendered in civil court between buyer and seller is not controlling in administrative proceeding against licensee where DOS and licensee were not parties in the civil suit and professional conduct of the licensee was not litigated; duty of disclosure to a buyer by a seller's agent is derivative; seller's agent must make the same disclosure to a buyer that the law requires a seller to make; disclosure by seller's agent to buyer's agent of the condition of the property as known by seller's agent was timely, proper and essentially a disclosure to buyer of that information; DOS has failed to prove by substantial evidence its allegation that basement flooding was a common occurrence or that broker was fully aware that homes in the neighborhood where the property is located encountered frequent flooding; complaint dismissed

¶ 44 We reach the same conclusion for Buyer's remaining negligence allegations against Paramount, which we note for the record, were not specifically addressed in Buyer's motion for partial summary judgment.

¶ 43 Taking as true all four of Buyer's allegations of professional negligence against Paramount, we conclude the first allegation, i.e., «failing to disclose all documents and information necessary to [Buyer],» as this Court previously held, addresses the conduct of a real estate licensee that is subject to the Disclosure Act.

The Buyers filed a lawsuit against the seller, the real estate professionals involved in the transaction, the inspector, and the title company, with a wide variety of allegations against the parties.

Based on all of this, the court dismissed the Buyer's allegations against the Franchisor and Cendant.