In the court's majority opinion, Kagan described the two - part analysis utilized by the high court when plaintiffs
allege racial gerrymandering as follows: «First, the plaintiff must prove that «race was the predominant factor motivating the legislature's decision to place a significant number of voters within or without a particular district.»
With Republicans controlling both state chambers, the congressional delegation was expected to remain at six Republicans and one Democrat, which was not lost on critics, who
alleged racial discrimination and political
gerrymandering.