Sentences with phrase «alleged actions best»
But are the suspected gunman's alleged actions best understood as human evil, in light of evidence that the suspect has a mental disorder?
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ Not exact matches
In December 2012, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, granted final approval of a $ 43 million settlement of individual actions against JPMorgan Chase and Bear Stearns, as well as numerous other providers and brokers, alleging antitrust violations in the market for financial instruments related to municipal bond offerings.»
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in a federal complaint filed in 2010 alleged RJB Properties Inc. discriminated against and fired Hispanic employees, as well as took retaliatory actions against two African - American employees who refused orders to fire them.
He suggested President Donald Trump should resign as well though, «in light of his own many alleged and self described actions.»
Prosecutors have alleged that Mr. Silver obtained nearly $ 4 million in illicit fees in return for taking official actions that benefited Dr. Robert N. Taub, a cancer specialist at Columbia University, as well as two real estate development firms.
Based upon a complaint I filed, Connecticut's State Election's Enforcement Commission has opened an official investigation into the alleged campaign finance violations of Residents for a Better Bridgeport, the political action committee that was created to support Bridgeport Mayor Bill Finch's unsuccessful effort to eliminate Bridgeport's democratically elected Board of Education and replace it with one appointed by himself.
The Board shall first (within 20 days) consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the Club or the breed.
If a majority of the Board does not consider that the actions alleged in the charges, if proved, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the Club or the breed, a hearing shall not be ordered, and the deposit shall be returned.
If a majority of the Board does not consider that the actions alleged in the charges, if proved, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the Club or the breed, a hearing shall not be ordered.
The Board Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the Board or present them at a Board Meeting, and the Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the Club or the breed.
A dog owner in the Chicago area has filed a class action lawsuit alleging that his 9 - year - old Pomeranian died as a result of eating Nestlé Purina's Waggin» Train Yam Good dog treats.
The Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the Board or present them at a Board Meeting, and the Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the Club.
The Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the Board or present them at a Board Meeting, and the Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the Club or the breed.
The Recording Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the Board or present them at a Board Meeting and the Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the club or the breed.
the board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the club.
The Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the board or present them at a board meeting, and the board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the club.
The Recording Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the Board or present them at a Board meeting, and the Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interests of the Club or the Breed.
The Corresponding Secretary shall promptly send a copy of the charges to each member of the Board or present them at a Board meeting, and the Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the Club or the breed.
The Board shall first consider whether the actions alleged in the charges, if proven, might constitute conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the Club or the breed.
First let's review the accusations from McIntyre, as best we have been able to discern them [Updated Oct. 7 to ensure it is understood these are the alleged actions]:
His putative class action alleges others were overcharged as well.
Siskinds filed the class action suit against Arctic Glacier in September 2008, alleging that the company had misrepresented itself as a «good corporate citizen».
In a pharmaceutical class action case, you are alleging that an FDA - approved medication or medical device made by a well - funded and perhaps well - established company caused you a serious injury.
Real estate brokers and agents: disputes relating to brokers, agents and their ethical, fiduciary and other common law disclosure and other obligations, as well as alleged breaches in civil actions and in ethics proceedings before state regulatory agencies
Decedent's husband brought a wrongful death action alleging ordinary negligence as well as corporate liability on the part of the hospital (decedent received surgery and emergency care at the same facility).
Mr. Whitney's representative work includes a series of successful outcomes pursuing false advertising claims against product review websites, a landmark victory clarifying copyright fair use and parody on behalf of several well - known musicians; a defense win dismissing copyright infringement claims brought by a putative class of attorneys against the leading legal research websites; a favorable outcome for a high - end beauty products company in a trademark and trade dress action against a manufacturer of knock - off products; a district and appellate court decision dismissing all claims by a proposed class against an international bank for alleged violations of, among other things, the Federal False Marking Act, RICO and the CAN - SPAM Act; and counseling prominent art museums and galleries on domestic and international copyright issues.
MPs have a Code of Conduct, as holders of public office, which governs the principles of their actions and requires them, at all times, to act in the public interest, first and not to gain any financial or material benefit from their office... it is glaringly obvious that, whatever may be in particular rules, some MPs» [alleged] actions fall well short of their overriding duties.»
Taylor Hampton's Lewis is set to arrive in the US this weekend to begin discussions with New York civil liberties lawyer Norman Siegel over legal action for three alleged victims of phone - hacking described as a «well - known sports person», a sports person not in the public eye and a US citizen.
At its best, a Rule 11 Motion is a Motion from one professional to another professional, stating that a particular claim is not allowed by law (e.g. if you have alleged a cause of action that the Supreme Court has explicitly rejected).
This week, the company filed an unusual application in federal court, seeking certification of a reverse class action against an unknown number of alleged uploaders of five movies using BitTorrent (The Cobbler, Pay the Ghost, Good Kill, Fathers and Daughters, and American Heist).
Edison Subs, LLC — a transferee of a Edison, New Jersey Subway restaurant — brought an action in New Jersey state court against the franchisor (Doctor's Associates, Inc.), the former franchisee (Aliya Patel), and the franchisor's affiliate (Subway Real Estate Corp.), alleging breach of contract, fraud, violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, negligent misrepresentation, and violation of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
In Spina v. Shoppers Drug Mart, the firm represents the interests of the owners of Shoppers Drug Mart franchises in an action alleging that Shoppers Drug Mart has breached the terms of the Associate Agreement as well as its duty of good faith and statutory duty of fair dealing (where applicable) with regards to how it has been operating the franchise system.
To insulate college personnel from personal law suits which allege misconduct while carrying out duties, section 24 of the BC Health Professions Act provides that «no action for damages lies or may be brought» against a board member or a person acting for a board or college «because of anything done or omitted in good faith.»
The franchisees» action alleged that GM breached the duty of good faith and fair dealings under the Act and at common law.
In this action, the plaintiffs allege that Shoppers breached its Associate Agreements by charging excessive cost recovery fees and equipment rental fees as well as issues pertaining to leasing and commercially unreasonable procurement and inventory policies.
Our reputation as one of the top class action defense firms in the country results from our significant experience in defending against alleged class actions across a broad range of pharmaceutical and other products litigation, as well as antitrust, employment and securities litigation.
Later, these dealers launched a class action lawsuit against GM, alleging that GM breached its duty to act in good faith when it required that they respond to the termination proposal within only six days.
a global payment provider with respect to a U.S. Attorney's Office investigation into allegations of overbilling and a related class action filed in the Eastern District of New York, as well as an internal investigation regarding alleged fraud by an employee accused of embezzlement.
A second lawsuit alleging negligence at Puyallup's Good Samaritan Hospital in connection with hepatitis C exposure has been filed; this one is a class - action.
Mateo - Harris has extensive experience defending employers in litigation at both the state and federal court level through trial and appeal, including in restrictive covenant and contract - and tort - based actions, as well as with respect to alleged violations of wage payment and equal employment opportunity laws.
Represented the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of Apple, Inc. in an internal investigation into the alleged backdating of stock option grants received by Apple executives including Steve Jobs, as well as the Apple Special Litigation Committee in related shareholder derivative lawsuits and class action litigation.
The starting point when considering a derivative action is the first limb of the well cited rule in Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189, namely that the proper plaintiff in an action in respect of a wrong alleged to be done to the company is prima facie the company itself.
Losses were alleged to have been incurred by Profit Point and Autoestate and the issue which arose was whether or not Waddington could bring derivative actions on behalf of those companies the subsidiaries) as well as on behalf of Playmates (the parent).
On behalf of his client, Mr. Best, Mr. Slansky commenced a new action, alleging intentional torts committed during the contempt proceedings by 39 defendants, and reiterating the accusations of corruption and impropriety.
«While we can't comment on the alleged actions of a former employee due to ongoing litigation, we want to be clear that our policies always have our members» best interests in mind,» the company said.
That was after a 2006 class action lawsuit that alleged the Michigan Department of Human Services had failed to protect the safety and well - being of almost 19,000 children in state custody.
In its action, the QFREB alleges that DuProprio has been engaging in deceptive advertising campaigns for years and misleading Quebec consumers about the supposed savings associated with DuProprio's services, as well as the advantages of its real estate services compared to those of brokers.
Venezia v. Coldwell Banker Sammis Realty (270 A.D. 2d 480)- buyer's action against seller for fraud for failing to disclose toxic contamination of untapped ground water beneath the property and surrounding area dismissed; cause of action against brokers severed; buyer's claim of fraud against seller was extinguished upon closing as a result of specific merger clause in contract of sale; moreover, buyer's failed to allege that seller made any representation about the condition of the land's subsurface or groundwater and did not allege that seller engaged in concealment or otherwise deceitful conduct designed to prevent the discovery of such contamination; seller is under no duty to speak; salesperson of one of the defendant real estate agencies represented to buyer that the house was in good condition