NP Aerospace Limited (trading as Morgan Advanced Materials Composites and Defence Systems) v Ministry of Defence [2014] EWHC 2741 (TCC)(procurement, allegedly abnormally low tender and
alleged breaches of obligations of equal treatment and transparency).
The International Court of Justice has rejected jurisdiction over the claim brought by the Marshall Islands against the United Kingdom,
alleging breach of the obligation (under Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty) to negotiate in good faith for nuclear disarmament.
In Colombia, a series of significant claims against the State for
an alleged breach of its obligations under free trade agreements or investment protection agreements has shown that arbitration is one of the most important tools at the disposal of independent investors to protect them against the possible breach of these agreements.
Not exact matches
«Leidel does not seek to enforce the terms
of the User Agreements, nor does he
allege any tort rooted in an allegation that Defendant
breached or facilitated a
breach of any
obligation uniquely imposed by those agreements.
In a joint statement from the litigator and law firm, they said this morning the class action would
allege that Treasury Wine Estates misled the market and
breached its continuous disclosure
obligations in relation to the financial impact
of over-stocked US distributors.
The claim
alleges Treasury, whose brands include Penfolds, Rosemount, Lindemans and Wynns, misled the market and
breached its continuous disclosure
obligations in relation to the financial impact
of over-stocked third - party distributors in the US.
Following the recent presidential pardon granted some convicts by President Goodluck Jonathan, Socioeconomic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP has called on the government
of President Goodluck Jonathan to immediately «rescind the
alleged state pardon granted former Bayelsa State Governor, Diepreye Alamieyeseigha, and former head, Bank
of the North, Shettima Bulama, as the said pardon is a fundamental
breach of the country's constitution and international anti-corruption
obligations.»
The commission believes its investigation into
alleged breaches of reporting
obligations will take at least another month, potentially taking it past the one - year time limit for launching criminal proceedings.
«The
alleged diversion also shows a serious
breach of anticorruption legislation including the EFCC Act, and Nigeria's international
obligations under the UN Convention against Corruption and the African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption both
of which the country has ratified.
The court case we've run is
alleging breaches of the responsible lending
obligations, as well as some instances
of unconscionable conduct in relation to a series
of loans that were given to consumers for the purchase
of motor vehicles.
The Underwriting Agreement between the Trust and Ceros Financial Services Inc. («Ceros») provides that the Registrant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Ceros, its several officers and directors, and any person who controls Ceros within the meaning
of Section 15
of the Securities Act free and harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, liabilities and expenses (including the reasonable cost
of investigating or defending such claims, demands or liabilities and any reasonable counsel fees incurred in connection therewith) which Ceros, its officers and directors, or any such controlling persons, may incur under the Securities Act, the 1940 Act, or common law or otherwise, arising out
of or based upon: (i) any untrue statement, or
alleged untrue statement,
of a material fact required to be stated in either any Registration Statement or any Prospectus, (ii) the
breach of any representations, warranties or
obligations set forth herein, (iii) any omission, or
alleged omission, to state a material fact required to be
In a blog post discussing the involvement
of solicitors in pseudonymous law firms like those
alleged to be used by the banks, Richard Moorhead has observed, among other things, that «there is a substantial risk that the solicitors who signed or were involved in the production
of the letters have
breached their
obligation to act with integrity» and that «there is a question over whether Outcome 11.1 (rule 11.1 in effect) has been
breached that is solicitors must not, take unfair advantage
of third parties [the debtors] in their professional capacity.»
Symmary: The appellant challenged a Swedish arbitral award,
alleging that it had rightfully terminated the arbitration clause due to the counterparty's
breach of an implied
obligation of...
It covers a wide range
of considerations, including: the date the BIT enters into force; the timing
of the
alleged breach; whether there is an identifiable investor; whether there is an identifiable investment; fair and equitable treatment; expropriation;
breach of the
obligation to provide full protection and security, most - favoured nation provisions and their implications; «umbrella clauses» and their implications; whether there are explicitly incorporated procedural requirements to be followed; whether there is sufficient evidence to make out a prima facie case
of breach of a BIT; the value
of the claim; and «just and equitable» damages.
«Project X»: represented Respondent purchaser
of «superyacht» defending a claim for
alleged losses and damage suffered as a result
of an
alleged wrongful repudiation
of a written brokerage agreement and as a result
of alleged breaches of Respondent's
obligation of confidentiality arising under that agreement.
Northrock sued ExxonMobil, its subsidiaries, and the third party,
alleging that the transfer by ExxonMobil to its subsidiaries was in
breach of the principle established in GATXCorp v Hawker Siddeley Canada Inc («GATX») that a seller acts in bad faith if a transaction is structured so as to avoid ROFR
obligations.
Superyacht — brokerage dispute: instructed on behalf
of a purchaser
of a multi-million Euro «superyacht» (100 + m) to defend a substantial claim proceeding in (LMAA) arbitration for
alleged losses and damage suffered as a result
of an
alleged wrongful repudiation
of a written brokerage agreement and as a result
of alleged breaches of the Respondent's
obligation of confidentiality arising under that agreement.
Pain, suffering and loss
of amenity and / or diminution in value and / or loss
of enjoyment
of holidays and / or losses and expenses sustained by them during their stays at the Hotel Torremolinos Beach Club Hotel between October 2000 and July 2002 as a result
of the Defendants»
alleged breach of contracts, the Defendants» and / or suppliers
of other services failure to properly perform their
obligations to the Claimants in accordance with the Package Travel, Package Holidays and Package Tours regulations 1992.
The purchaser sued for specific performance
alleging breach of the Board's
obligation to use best efforts to obtain the severance, and sought damages in the alternative.