While Long
alleged during court proceedings that the assistant had consented to the acts, a judge found that Long was «wilfully blind, and took no reasonable steps to ascertain that the complainant was consenting.»
While Long
alleged during court proceedings that the assistant had consented to the acts, a judge found that Long was «wilfully blind, and took no reasonable steps to ascertain that the complainant was consenting.»
Not exact matches
The losing party once again filed for the setting aside of the award, this time
alleging that the tribunal had not observed the decision of the
court rendered
during the first setting aside
proceedings and, moreover, this led the tribunal to overlook the limitation periods included in Polish law.
The Ontario
Court of Appeal recently upheld a decision requiring the employer to indemnify its former employee for costs and expenses the employee incurred
during an internal investigation and dismissal
proceedings for
alleged fraudulent misconduct.