Naughton, explaining his reasons for pulling the plug on INUK, said that it was «no longer acceptable that hundreds of students around the country can say on their CVs that they are working with an INUK innocence project when they know next to nothing about INUK or how to work on
an alleged wrongful conviction cases».
Not exact matches
My book looks at 11
cases of
alleged wrongful conviction, all of which raise serious questions about the justice system.
AIDWYC contends that Canadian
cases of
alleged wrongful convictions should «not [be] examined from the adversarial perspective of trying to show that the convicted person was rightfully treated by the court system» as occurs at present through the Minister of Justice's current practice under section 696.1147 Rather, AIDWYC argues that an independent review board like CCRC should «undertake a fresh review without bias.»
I recommend that, in the future, there should be a completely independent entity established which can effectively, efficiently, and quickly review
cases in which
wrongful conviction is
alleged.