Sentences with phrase «alleging injury»

Protects you from claims made alleging injury to your employees due to work - related discrimination, negligent hiring or termination, or harassment.

Your auto policy won't cover claims alleging injury or damage that results from work you have completed.

«Johnson & Johnson and subsidiary Ethicon Inc. on April 13 opposed a motion by nine plaintiffs to centralize federal lawsuits alleging injury from the Physiomesh Flexible Composite hernia patch (In Re: Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2782, JPMDL).»

It is already facing lawsuits from victims alleging injury from a defective product, and Indiana state officials are seeking to suspend its license.

Representing a major medical - device manufacturer, we argue that state - law tort claims alleging injury from the off - label use of a Class III medical device are expressly and impliedly preempted by federal law.

Whether it be a First Amendment case or a mesothelioma injury, a plaintiff must plead facts alleging injury and causation in order for a court to hear the case.

Representing a variety of clients against single - plaintiff claims alleging injury from exposure to various chemicals, including silica dust, pesticides, PAHs, isocyanates, and other industrial chemicals.

«Applying that standard here, petitioners bear the burden of alleging an injury that is fairly traceable to the Environmental Protection Agency's failure to promulgate new motor vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards, and that is likely to be redressed by the prospective issuance of such standards.»

We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any claim, action, petition, demand for arbitration or lawsuit alleging injury or damage resulting from any use of TWIST, whether arising in tort or contract, law or equity;

As a preliminary issue, The DFS argues that Chino does not have standing to pursue this claim because his alleged injuries are too speculative and there is no «allegation that [Chino] is actually engaged in activity that would be covered by the Regulation.»

The Rev. Al Sharpton's daughter, Dominique Sharpton, 30 — who has been suing NYC for seven - figures over an alleged injury she suffered on a street — successfully made her way to the altar to wed fellow activist Marcus Bright, 33, in a public ceremony at the Greater Allen AME Cathedral in Queens.

Dominique Sharpton, 30 — who has been suing the city for seven - figures over an alleged injury she suffered on a street — successfully made her way to the altar to wed fellow activist Marcus Bright, 33, in a public ceremony at the Greater Allen AME Cathedral in Queens.

Much of the discussion within the court centered on how California would respond to a decision for the plaintiffs, and how the federal government might induce a response that would redress the alleged injury.

While it's a busy city, and bumping into someone on the street could result in a liability claim for their injuries or alleged injuries, there's more to liability coverage.

For example, for the issue of Navient putting people into forbearance when it was not in their best interest, Navient says, «Here, the alleged injury — borrowers entering forbearance without considering alternative repayment plans — was entirely «avoidable» because federally mandated notices and other disclosures provided borrowers with the necessary information to make a «free and informed choice» regarding forbearance and alternative repayment options.»

But Plaintiffs» own allegations reveal the inescapable centrality of greenhouse gas emissions to their alleged injuries.

In response to the plaintiff's lawsuit, the defendant retained a medical expert to ascertain the source of the plaintiff's alleged injuries and offer a medical opinion as to whether the injuries were caused by the plaintiff's fall on the defendant's property.

[39] The strongest reason for bringing the action in the Supreme Court related to the plaintiff's alleged injuries, but that must be closely examined in light of her pre-existing condition.

Lightfoot has represented a number of manufacturers in mass tort actions alleging injuries from exposure to various chemicals, including isocyanates, formaldehyde, creosote, dixoin, and metalworking fluids.

There were approximately 30,000 additional cases brought by individuals and businesses alleging injuries from PCB contamination in Anniston, Alabama.

The policy at issue in this case, was crafted in such a way that in order to engage the insurer's duty to defend, it required the communication, during the policy period, by a third party, of an intention to hold the Jesuits responsible for damages.36 In this case, it was accepted by the parties, that if the claims were made within the temporal limits of the Policy, the duty to defend would have been engaged as the claims allege injuries that would fall within the policy.37 In fact the Court found one of the claims was made within the policy period and therefore did trigger the insurer's duty to defend.38 The rest of the claims however were found not to have been communicated during the policy period and, as a result, the insurer did not have a duty to defend the actions.39 The determination of whether a policy will be «claims - made» or «occurrence based» will depend on many factors.

This may seem obvious, but it's often difficult to determine which parties shoulder the responsibility for an alleged injury.

[8] This can easily result in conflicting decisions as effectively both judge and jury are separately determining the existence and severity of the alleged injuries.

That the representative plaintiff has suffered the same alleged injuries as the rest of the proposed class

Particularly prevalent are alleged injuries sustained in disciplines such as A&E and Orthopaedics.

After obtaining the statement of the complainant and the medical evidence, defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger retained a defence medical expert to assess the report and x-rays of the alleged injury.

[14] A plaintiff must show: (1) an unfair act or deceptive trade practice occurred; (2) the unfair or deceptive trade practice caused the plaintiff to suffer an injury; and (3) there is a causal link between the unfair or deceptive act and the alleged injury.

Further, there were no photos of any alleged injuries.

§ 1983 complaint Actions under § 1983 are personal injury claims and are governed by the personal injury statute of limitations in the state in which the alleged injury occurred.

Slip, trip and fall accidents cause severe injury, pain, work loss and other problems for an injured person, so these injured parties are quick to seek compensation for their alleged injuries.

However, he went to state that, «[o] ne hundred and ninety - four pages of Facebook entries from [the plaintiff's Facebook page... were entered in evidence... There are extensive status updates, photographs, and other posts... that at face value appear to directly contradict her evidence regarding her alleged injuries, and her state of mind following [the accident].»

Once a Defendant obtains an opinion from a properly qualified expert with respect to the Plaintiff's alleged injury, a further exam will not be ordered to bolster the opinion of the initial expert.

She's claiming more than $ 300,000 in damages for her alleged injuries with the help of her Illinois injury attorney, according to the Chicago Sun - Times.

In the recent case (Norris v. Burgess) the Plaintiff alleged injury as a result of two collisions.

In that case, defense counsel offered publicly viewable posts from the plaintiff's account that seemed to show physical activity inconsistent with her alleged injuries.

Third, with regard to the closeness of the connection between Crane Co.'s conduct and the alleged injury, the Court listed several measures Crane Co. could have taken to prevent take - home exposure, such as providing uniforms, on - site showers and laundry services, and / or requiring employees to change their clothes before leaving the facility.

Mandel v. Fakhim (2016)-- In this 3 - week jury trial, Frank successfully defended against the plaintiff's claim for $ 1 million arising from alleged injuries sustained by the plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident.

Lawsuits allege injuries from Bard Recovery IVC filters, Bard G2s and Bard G2 Express.

The Indiana Tort Claims Act, specifically Title 34 -13-3-6 of the state code, mandates that a tort action for negligence against a government agency or employee is barred unless notice is provided within 270 days of the alleged injury.

In all three, the plaintiff's post-accident physical capabilities were in issue as was the impact of alleged injuries on the particular plaintiff's social life.

Accordingly, the plaintiff must establish, on a balance of probabilities, a causal link between the alleged breach of the standard of care and the alleged injuries.»

The court noted that such allocation of costs is a highly complex and hotly contested issue, and that it was thus ill - suited to redress the alleged injuries.

A woman who alleges injury from slipping in water near a dairy freezer while she shopped for frozen pizza at a Virginia Beach Kroger store can not show the store was negligent; plaintiff testified she saw the yellow warning cone near...

A woman who alleges injuries from following a hotel employee's directive to jump when a hotel elevator stopped between floors can not sue the elevator maintenance company on contract claims; the Norfolk Circuit Court says the contract does not specifically intend...

All Claims are brought by, or on behalf of, former Iraqi employees of the Defendants in Iraq, and all those contracted via third parties to offer services to the Defendants in Iraq between 2003 and 2009 and seek damages from one or more of the Defendants alleged injuries and / or financial losses caused by the alleged failure of one or more of the Defendants to adequately protect them or their Deceased relatives from risk of threats and / or injury from those opposed to the Defendants» presence in Iraq.

News The appeals court cited a Supreme Court ruling in June that placed limits on where injury lawsuits could be filed, saying state courts can not hear claims against companies not based in the state where alleged injuries occurred.

As a Fairfax criminal lawyer, I know that the sentencing stakes get higher as the alleged injuries become more serious.

In today's case (Humphrey v. McDonald) the Plaintiff alleged injury following a collision.

Perhaps the Court's most interesting conclusion is that the rule in Foss v. Harbottle is alive and well: the oppression remedy is not available where the alleged injury is to the company and the claimant suffers no separate harm.

Next, the lawyer has to show that there was a departure from that standard of care and, as a result of the departure from the standard of care, that you suffered the alleged injuries.