If the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that one of the
parties has committed sexual assault and the child was conceived
as a result of the sexual assault, there is a rebuttable presumption that it is not in the best interests of the child to
allocate sole or split decision - making authority to the
party found to have committed sexual assault or to
allocate mutual decision - making
between a
party found to have committed sexual assault and the
party who was sexually assaulted with respect to any issue.