By applying our asset
allocation percentages going into the crisis against these losses we can compute our personal portfolio's capital loss excluding dividends and interest.
Not exact matches
This money, which represents the second highest
percentage of this year's capital
allocations, will
go towards technology upgrades and other physical plant improvements in public schools across The Bronx.
Then, if prices
went up steadily for a time, that might cause your stock
allocation to rise to 70 percent without your having done anything to make that happen (stocks can become a higher
percentage of your portfolio just because they are worth more).
As time
goes on, you may need to make rebalancing adjustments to maintain your asset
allocation within the
percentages and tolerances that you wish to maintain.
If your regular contributions are a small
percentage (say < 1 %) of your total portfolio, and your
allocation is out of whack by say 10 % or more, you may want to
go with option number 1.
If your current
allocation is 60 % or 70 % it would be appropriate for you to decrease the
percentage of stock but not
going all to cash.
I provided an argument as to what
allocation amount /
percentage has been deemed «optimal» according to studies made on past data (but we know that historical data can only
go so far), but each person makes their own decisions as to what they'd like to do with their portfolios.
What one stock
allocation percentage makes sense both when the long - term return is likely
going to be 15 percent real and when the long - term return is likely
going to be a negative 1 percent real?
Percentage of LP portfolios currently invested in real estate, and planned
allocations going forward