Not exact matches
In consideration of the fact that no clear justification has been provided to substantiate the amount claimed and the fact that I regard legal computerized research, unless otherwise proven, as office overhead expense as it compares to the subscription services
law firms library had to maintain in the past and which were also considered office overhead, the disbursements claimed for electronic legal research are not
allowed.
For example, the use of online forms for auto - generating legal documents or for client intake, searchable and linkable
law and file
libraries, referral databases and other tools through the VLO may
allow for the
firm to avoid having to reinvent the wheel with each new online client.