But he and other prison reform advocates called on Congress to pass legislation to undo laws that
allow mandatory sentencing to continue.
Not exact matches
Similarly, the majority of gun owners (67 percent) also support
allowing cities to sue licensed gun dealers when the gun dealer's sales practices
allow criminals to obtain guns and requiring a
mandatory minimum
sentence of two years in prison for a person convicted of knowingly selling a gun to someone who can not legally have one (71 percent).
«Softer» drugs like marijuana are
allowed for medicinal use, and possession for non-licensed individuals may result in a misdemeanor rather than a felony, but even for marijuana there's a
mandatory minimum
sentencing guideline.
Because this charge has what is called a «
mandatory minimum», other
sentencing options that typically
allow you to avoid a criminal record while still pleading guilty, such as a «conditional discharge», are not available.
In the alternative, Parliament could provide for judicial discretion to
allow for a lesser
sentence where the
mandatory minimum would be grossly disproportionate and would constitute cruel and unusual punishment,» said the majority.
«In the alternative, Parliament could provide for judicial discretion to
allow for a lesser
sentence where the
mandatory minimum would be grossly disproportionate and would constitute cruel and unusual punishment.»
The Court properly and succinctly recognized that unless
sentencing judges are
allowed to define their alternative scorings categorically and honestly, there are only two possible outcomes: Either the guidelines are essentially
mandatory, or judges lie about their reasoning, which is «institutional subterfuge.»
Perhaps the answer will come from the ghost of Irwin Cotler, who in one of his last acts as a member of Parliament introduced a private member's bill that would
allow judges to consider particular circumstances at
sentencing, notwithstanding
mandatory minimums.
The American criminal justice system is far from being sufficiently enlightened, starting by too many presumed - innocent people caged without bond pending
sentencing, moving to Virginia's crabbed criminal discovery system, continuing to Virginia's system that
allows prosecutors to scare defendants to plead guilty by their refusal to waive a jury that in many instances and locations can mean more racist jurors than judges on top of the jurors often being more wild cards than judges for
sentencing, continuing to the many judges who choose judicial efficiency over a fair trial, continuing to the brutal capital punishment system, cntinuing to excessive
mandatory minimum and guideline
sentencing, and continuing to the slew of innocent convicted people (many of whom plead gulilty rather than risking a worse fate), and continuing to frequently excessive
sentences and excessive probation violation
sentences.
The safety valve also restores a partial measure of judicial discretion,
allowing a judge to
sentence below a statutory
mandatory minimum, should the judge believe the
sentence is too harsh for the offense committed...
Nothing in the safety valve prevents judges from
sentencing prisoners at or above the
mandatory minimum even if they are eligible for the safety valve, but simply
allows judicial discretion to ensure that prison resources are being used where they can best protect public safety, and not wasted on nonviolent, low - level drug offenders.
In that
mandatory system, a judge was not
allowed to consider any factor (often a «policy» factor) that the
Sentencing Commission had already considered.
«Supreme Court
Allows Lighter Crack
Sentences; Justices Say
Sentencing Guidelines Are Advisory, Not
Mandatory»: Robert Barnes of The Washington Post provides this news update.
The issue of
sentencing was adjourned to
allow the accused to pursue an application challenging the constitutionality of the
mandatory minimum
sentence pursuant to s. 12 of the Charter (i.e., the provision respecting cruel and unusual punishment).
In his last act as a member of Parliament, former Liberal justice minister Irwin Cotler introduced a private members» bill that would
allow judges to impose a fair and appropriate
sentence, notwithstanding
mandatory minimums.
The
mandatory detention laws in the Northern Territory and Western Australia do not
allow for a right of appeal against the
sentence, if the
sentence should equate with the minimum permitted, and is therefore in breach of the ICCPR.