The second is changing the statutory requirements for teachers» performance reviews, particularly to
allow measures of student learning instead of or in addition to student growth «determined solely by state assessment.»
Not exact matches
Some
of these scenes appeared repeatedly, which
allowed us to
measure how well
students could
learn the layout
of such images.
This points to a desperate need to move toward a competency - based
learning system that
measures and rewards individual
student growth, as well as an underlying shared
learning infrastructure that
allows the country to identify each unique
student in a consistent way — so that when he or she moves geographies, the
student's record does as well — and to keep track
of what that
student knows and can do in a consistent way across geographies.
This
allows us to
measure peer effects free from the reflection problem, providing a rare opportunity to test the notion that even one «bad apple» impedes the
learning of all other
students.
While this approach has some benefits in keeping kids on task, Oppenheimer seems to support it primarily because it moves the teacher back to center stage and eliminates the inherent messiness
of allowing students some
measure of control over their own
learning.
Measuring progress
of student learning does not have an impact if the results are not published in a clear, transparent, fair manner that
allows the general public to see the progress and the areas that need improvement.
Some
allow teachers to set their own
learning goals for
students,
measuring gains from the first day
of school to the last.
From the abstract: Authors
of this report find that «within the 30 states that [still] require
student learning measures to be at least a significant factor in teacher evaluations, state guidance and rules in most states
allow teachers to be rated effective even if they receive low scores on the
student learning component
of the evaluation.»
[4] The adequacy
of the adjustments across schools in value - added
measures, which would
allow the comparison
of teachers in different schools, is less clear because schools can contribute to
student learning in ways apart from the contribution
of individual teachers and because
students sort into schools in ways that value - added
measures may not adjust for well.
What that means is a test like the Iowa Test
of Basic Skills, or the SAT 10, that
measures students»
learning across the nation, but
allows the school to choose from a menu
of different tests.
The original affidavit
of Professor Linda Darling - Hammond
of Stanford University, sworn to February 28, 2015, that the assessment being used in Respondents» Growth Model does not
allow measurement
of growth for high - achieving and low achieving
students: the
learning of both high - achieving and low - achieving
students is mis -
measured because
of the fact that the state tests pegged to grade - level standards do not include items that can
measure growth for
students who are already above grade level in their skills or who fall considerably below.
With SVEF's iHub program, we continue to focus on quantifying
student learning in partnership with research organizations WestEd and Lea (R) n. Using the
Learn Trials platform
allows teachers to
measure specific aspects
of a product's effectiveness, as teacher Ada Lee discovered.
Colorado, while mandating that 50 percent
of a teacher's evaluation be based on
student growth,
allows districts to choose their own
student learning measures — including state assessment results — and decide how to weight them.66 In addition to adjustments to how much
student growth factors into evaluations, some states, including Georgia and Connecticut, have opted to delay full implementation
of their evaluation systems while they transition to the more rigorous Common Core standards.67 68
NAESP is pleased to have played a role in creating the opportunities that are now afforded to schools under the new law, such as
allowing accountability systems to include multiple
measures, factoring in elements other than test scores; conducting needs assessments for struggling schools and
learning communities facing the greatest challenges; developing clear and concise plans for targeting federal funding in ways that meet the needs
of students in the school; and implementing local programs and monitoring their progress in collaboration with educators.
States are
allowed to choose their own indicators
of Academic Progress and School Quality or
Student Success, but the chosen measures must be supported by research as likely to increase student le
Student Success, but the chosen
measures must be supported by research as likely to increase
student le
student learning.
Personalized
learning also
allows the
students to experience a
measure of academic success, sometimes for the first time, and builds their confidence with the eventual goal
of filling in their
learning gaps and equipping them for success when they leave the center.