Sentences with phrase «allow member states»

However, Article 5 (2) proceeds to allow Member States to carve out an exception under national law where sex is a «determining factor in the assessment of risk based on relevant and accurate actuarial data.»

However, whether and in what manner the CJEU should allow the Member States to apply their own, national, standard of rights protection different from this EU standard when a situation falls in the scope of EU law, remains controversial.

On the issue of data security, the Court held that Article 15 (1) does not allow Member States to derogate from the Directive's data security provisions, which require providers to take appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure the effective protection of retained data.

It does not just allow Member States to permit employers to exclude religious clothing, but it appears to have denied them the option not to.

Instead as requested by the Maltese presidency Ministers focused on giving their opinion on the proposed «safety reserve» - a proposal to allow member states to carry over a glut of worthless «hot air» carbon credits from previous years.

If it is found that the price evolution does not correspond to market fundamentals, the Commission may either allow Member States to bring forward the auctioning of a part of the quantity to be auctioned, or allow them to auction up to 25 % of the remaining allowances in the new entrant reserve.

Current rules allow Member States to tax printed... [Read more...]

There is a large movement to change the existing VAT policy and allow member states to set their own rates.

The tax would basically allow member states to tax Amazon's business within their countries, regardless of its there's a physical presence.

No 85 — We want MEPs to vote for this amendment, (which allows Member States to ban the advertising of baby foods) if Amendment 86 does not get through.

The Directive allows Member States to request, under strict conditions, time extensions to meet the air quality standards for PM10 (until 11th June 2011) and NO2 and benzene (until 2015 at the latest).

This procedure is an exception that allows a Member State to negotiate an international agreement with the rest of the EU before it actually leaves.

«Europe is the heaviest drinking region in the world, so it is vital the EU has a strategy that allows Member States to effectively tackle alcohol harm.

He explained that in leaving the EU we would lose our access to the European Arrest Warrant, which allows member states to easily extradite criminals to and from the continent.

Speaking in English, Huebner said EU rules allow member state to notify only one official language each, not two or more.

EU legislation allows Member States to apply reduced VAT rates to a limited list of goods and services set out in Annex III to the VAT Directive.

Essentially, this confirms the EU regulations allowing member states to set lower rates of VAT only apply to printed books.

This followed from a hard - fought derogation from the Directive by Tony Blair in 2006 which allowed member states without a domestic resale right on the entry into force of the Directive, to exclude ARR from the heirs or the estates of artists deceased within 70 years of the date of sale up until 1 January 2012.

In other words, if national authorities of a Member State are not prevented from prosecuting the suspect anew, it would be illogical not to allow another Member State to exercise its legitimate jurisdiction.

This provision allowed Member States to subject the execution of an EAW to the condition that the person had the opportunity to apply for a retrial, but only «if the person concerned ha [d] not been summoned in person or otherwise informed of the date and place of the hearing which led to the decision rendered in absentia.»

However, Article 7 (a) allowed member states to exclude the pensionable age from the scope of the Directive.

Further, Article 24 indicates that the Directive pursues minimum harmonisation only in that it allows Member States to adopt stricter rules than those laid down in the Directive.

After this six - month period, however, it may very well be that Union citizens retain their right to residence as work - seekers but the derogation of article 24 (2) allows Member States not to grant them social assistance (para. 57).

It then pivotally held that allowing Member States to deviate from the rules harmonised by the Directives would be incompatible with Article 114 TFEU for two reasons (paras 71 - 72).

124] It is not entirely clear what situations fall under the second situation, but it seems that Bot has in mind those situations where EU law allows the Member States discretion in implementing, and where implementation can be realised with both respecting national rights standards as well as the effectiveness of EU law.

The cases provide a test for the European court, which has in the past allowed member states considerable leeway concerning workplace tolerance of religious beliefs and symbols.

With regard to the applicability of Article 25 of the Visa Code, the Belgian government also argued that this Article only allows Member States to derogate from the imperative reasons to refuse a visa as listed in Article 32 (1)(a), and not if there are reasonable doubts as to the intention of the applicant to leave the territory of the Member State before the expiry of the visa applied for as stipulated in Article 32 (1)(b).

However, AG Mengozzi's analysis of the wording of Article 25 (1) of the Visa Code leads to the exact opposite conclusion, as he points out that this article allows the Member States, among others, to issue a new visa during the same six - month period to an applicant who has already used a visa allowing for a stay of three months during that six - month period.

Additionally, after the Paris attacks, Member States approved Directive (EU) 2016/681 on the EU Passenger Name Records («PNR») Transfer System, which allows member states to exchange personal information of passengers.

The Court was not only deferential in allowing the Member States discretion in how to tackle climate change within its territory, it also duly noted the EU legislative context in which the measures where adopted.

However, decisions at a European level have permitted certain differences in treatment which are «objectively justified», as allowing Member States to use mandatory retirement ages where «appropriate and necessary in order to achieve a legitimate aim in the context of national employment policy.»

73 Moreover, as regards those resources, the expression «recourse to the social assistance system» in Article 7 (1)(c) of Directive 2003/86 does not allow a Member State to refuse family reunification to a sponsor who proves that he has stable and regular resources which are sufficient to maintain himself and the members of his family, but who, given the level of his resources, will nevertheless be entitled to claim special assistance in order to meet exceptional, individually determined, essential living costs or income support measures (see Chakroun, paragraph 52).

Article 7 (1)(c) of that directive forms part of those conditions and allows the Member States to require evidence that the sponsor has stable and regular resources which are sufficient to maintain himself and the members of his family without recourse to the social assistance system of the Member State concerned.

The German government argued that Art 7 (1) allowed member states to determine the rules on carrying forward and payment in lieu.

That article allows a member state to restrict the scope of the Convention (a bit like the CISG) to contracts where both parties are in member states, or when the parties have agreed that the convention applies.

For example, the New York Convention allows member states to declare that they will enforce foreign arbitral awards only from countries that will enforce those made in the declaring state: in short, a reciprocity clause.

Article 6 of the Directive allows member states to provide that «differences of treatment on grounds of age shall not constitute discrimination, if, within the context of national law, they are objectively and reasonably justified by a legitimate aim, including legitimate employment policy, labour market and vocational training objectives, and if the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary».

Not exact matches

The single market is a huge trade arena that allows all EU member states to trade freely with one another without tariffs, quotas, or tax.

The single market is a deeper form of co-operation between member states that allows the free movement of goods, services, money, and people in the bloc.

The company states that the annual member fees will allow it to deliver «profit - free pricing»; that is, to back up its claim that «all of our profits come from membership fees, not the products we sell.»

«Member States can not let selected companies pay less tax by allowing them to artificially shift their profits elsewhere.

New laws in 37 states allow friends and family members of opioid users to obtain a prescription.

Currently, more than half of the European Union's 28 member states do not have any screening mechanism in place at the national level.22 Meanwhile in in July 2017, Germany adopted an amendment to the German Foreign Trade Regulation to allow the German government to screen and ultimately block a wider range of foreign takeovers.23

Others, including some gun control and mental health advocates, point to the increasing number of states that allow law enforcement officers or, in some cases, family members or others to petition a court to temporarily take guns from people who pose a danger to themselves or others.

NRF is a member of the Coalition for the American Dream, which supports renewal of the DACA program that allows children who were brought to the United States illegally by their parents to remain.

The concept of once saved always saved takes a bit to get your head around but Gods grace is greater than our sin and greater than our good works it just takes faith in Jesus Christ to recieve Gods grace.In saying that to continue to sin as a christian is like playing with fire you will be burnt.Paul talks of the sexual immorality in corinthian church of the son and father that were sleeping with the same wife they were excommunicated from the church the members were not allowed to even eat with them until they repented.There are consequences for our actions.The other side to this is that if you continue to sin as a christian you are not walking by faith but walking by the flesh and are really backsliding.In the backslidden state you also become powerless and open to attack by satan as long as we walk in the flesh he can influence us to get worse not better.If we are walking in Christ satan may still try to tempt us but we are empowered by the holy spirit and overcome him and our faith increases.Both are saved by grace but one is powerless because of sin versus saved but an overcomer having been set free from sin i think this is what Paul was trying to explain.It is better to be an overcomer than overcome by sin.brentnz

Robert Bellah has shown that American culture from its early beginnings has held two views in tension: on the one hand, the biblical understanding of community based on the notion of charity for all members, a community supported by public and private virtue; and, on the other hand, the utilitarian understanding that community is a neutral state which allows individuals to pursue the maximization of their self - interest.16.

He'd probably just look at you blankly and state, «I'm Jewish if that's what you're asking...» As were his twelve apostles, and all his followers... It wasn't until well after his death non jews were allowed to become members.

Then the state attorney general's office argued that the grand jury had been four members short of the full panel, and a judge allowed the case to be resubmitted.

Michigan's 38 - 31 Rose Bowl win over Washington salvaged a modicum of pride for the once powerful Big Ten, which, with Ohio State's 21 - 14 loss to Georgia in the Citrus and Illinois's 27 - 17 loss to Hawaii in the Holiday, is now 48 -57-1 in bowl games and a woeful 29 -44-1 since 1975, when the conference began allowing member schools to play in bowls other than the Rose.