The Education Savings Accounts for Military Families Act [H.R. 5199]
allows active duty military parents to set up Education...
The Education Savings Accounts for Military Families Act [H.R. 5199]
allows active duty military parents to set up Education Savings Accounts (ESAs), that can be used for a wide variety of education services for their children, including private school tuition.
Not exact matches
It would restore the Child Adoption Tax Credit left out of the previous version and
allow for a deduction of moving expenses available to
active -
duty military members.
The proposal would also
allow disabled students, foster children, siblings of current vouchers recipients and the children of
active duty military or veterans to receive vouchers, regardless of family income.
The proposed bill would also
allow disabled students, foster children, siblings of voucher recipients and children of
active duty military servicemembers and veterans to receive vouchers regardless of family income.
This final rule also
allows a state to accept applications from
active duty military personnel who are stationed in that state and to administer the written and skills tests for a CLP or CDL.
The Service Members Civil Relief Act passed in the 1940s
allows active military people to qualify for an interest rate reduction to a maximum of six percent per year during
active duty service.
A VA loan is a loan benefit for veterans and
active -
duty military that
allows borrowers to put 0 % down on a primary home.
Most private student loans never
allow you to defer, but with INvestEd, you may qualify to defer your loans while you're in school, while you're on
active duty military, or for certain financial hardships.
Although
active duty military personnel can not sue the government for injuries they personally sustained as the result of medical malpractice by a government healthcare provider, the FTCA
allows them to do so on behalf of their dependents or children.
Comment: A few commenters, members of the affected beneficiary class, which numbers approximately 2.6 million (
active duty and reserve
military personnel), opposed proposed § 164.510 (m) because it would have
allowed a non-governmental covered entity to provide protected health information without authorization to the
military.