Sentences with phrase «alpha coefficient in»

The Cronbach's alpha coefficient in this study was 0.76.

Not exact matches

Typically in coding complex media portrayals such as those of climate change, a Krippendorf's alpha coefficient of.70 or higher is considered sufficient agreement.

Cronbach's alphas coefficients for depression, anxiety and stress in this study were 0.902, 0.850 and 0.891, respectively.

The internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) are satisfactory while the coefficients intraclass are less than those obtained by the authors in the test - retest.

Many of the scales demonstrated weak psychometrics in at least one of the following ways: (a) lack of psychometric data [i.e., reliability and / or validity; e.g., HFQ, MASC, PBS, Social Adjustment Scale - Self - Report (SAS - SR) and all perceived self - esteem and self - concept scales], (b) items that fall on more than one subscale (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version), (c) low alpha coefficients (e.g., below.60) for some subscales, which calls into question the utility of using these subscales in research and clinical work (e.g., HFQ, MMPI - A, CBCL - 1991 version, BASC, PSPCSAYC), (d) high correlations between subscales (e.g., PANAS - C), (e) lack of clarity regarding clinically - relevant cut - off scores, yielding high false positive and false negative rates (e.g., CES - D, CDI) and an inability to distinguish between minor (i.e., subclinical) and major (i.e., clinical) «cases» of a disorder (e.g., depression; CDI, BDI), (f) lack of correspondence between items and DSM criteria (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version, CDI, BDI, CES - D, (g) a factor structure that lacks clarity across studies (e.g., PSPCSAYC, CASI; although the factor structure is often difficult to assess in studies of pediatric populations, given the small sample sizes), (h) low inter-rater reliability for interview and observational methods (e.g., CGAS), (i) low correlations between respondents such as child, parent, teacher [e.g., BASC, PSPCSAYC, CSI, FSSC - R, SCARED, Connors Ratings Scales - Revised (CRS - R)-RSB-, (j) the inclusion of somatic or physical symptom items on mental health subscales (e.g., CBCL), which is a problem when conducting studies of children with pediatric physical conditions because physical symptoms may be a feature of the condition rather than an indicator of a mental health problem, (k) high correlations with measures of social desirability, which is particularly problematic for the self - related rating scales and for child - report scales more generally, and (l) content validity problems (e.g., the RCMAS is a measure of anxiety, but contains items that tap mood, attention, peer interactions, and impulsivity).

For the total score of Greek UCLA the results showed a high satisfactory and adequate psychometrically Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.91, which is comparable to alphas reported in previous studies ranging from 0.89 to 0.97.

Indeed, coefficient alphas often underestimate the reliability (Sijtsma, 2009) and they are influenced by the number of items as well as other factors (e.g., duplicated items, the number of dimensions in the scale; Huysamen, 2006).

The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total scale was good in the present study (0.97; Duan et al., 2015).

In the construction study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged between.81 and.86 for Presence and.84 and.92 for Search.

In this study, the Cronbach alpha coefficient for the RSES was 0.84.

In this study, the Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.91.

In phase II, internal consistency of the Urdu translated version of PLS was determined through test re-test reliability / cross language validation, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation.

In Egypt, the Cronbach alpha coefficients for the same measure of communal strength were.82 for marriage,.54 for mothers, and.89 for best friends.

Results indicated the good level of internal consistency in form of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient (α =.89).

In phase II, internal consistency was computed through test - retest reliability / cross language validation, Cronbach's's alpha reliability coefficient and item total correlation.

Results reported in Table 2 shows high level of Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient on the scores of Urdu Passionate Love Scale (α =.90) which is quite good and high.

In the United States, the Cronbach alpha coefficients for the five items measuring communal strength were.85 for spouses,.92 for mothers, and.90 for best friends.

In Egypt, the Cronbach alpha coefficients for the same communal strength measures were.71 for marriage,.88 for mothers, and.91 for best friends.

In the current study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficients for both dimensions were good (0.92 for the 18 attachment anxiety items and 0.85 for the 18 attachment avoidance items).

In the present study, this subscale had an alpha coefficient of.86.

In the present sample, the Cronbach alpha (internal reliability) coefficient for the anxiety scale was.90 and for the avoidance scale,.91.

The alpha coefficient for the ACS was.86 in the present study.

2) Brazilian version of a general scale of relationship satisfaction (Schumm et al., 1986), translated and validated in a sample of 342 participants with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of.90 (Wachelke, De Andrade, Souza, & Cruz, 2007), a measure composed by three items [«I am satisfied with my relationship», «I am satisfied with my companion in what concerns his / her role in the relationship» and «I am satisfied with my relationship with my companion»] completed in a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from 1 = «strongly disagree» to 5 = «strongly agree».

The Chinese version of SF - 12v2 has been validated and normed in local Chinese population with Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranging from 0.60 to 0.89.43 54 55

The tool has good psychometric properties with Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranging from 0.66 to 0.94.47 Its Chinese version has been used in local Chinese children.43 48

The Parental Bonding factor of caring was used in the current analysis, based on our previous work with parents with AIDS [11], [16](4 items; coefficient alpha =.73).

However, these alpha coefficients are lower than those listed in the manual.

However, an exception could possibly be made for the hyperactivity / inattention problem scale of the SDQ - T; this subscale demonstrated both the highest reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.88) and highest validity (Spearman's correlation coefficient 0.72) in our study.

Other (psycho - oncology) studies [11, 15, 32] have reported alpha coefficients similar to those in the present study, which ranged from 0.42 (cohesion) to 0.69 (conflict).

In this study, the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of this measure is 0.64 for mothers and 0.6 for fathers.

In the current study, Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the scales ranged from 0.82 to 0.90.