Not exact matches
Tom, Tom, the Piper's Son Tom did not ask a question to get an
answer because he
already knew the only
answer he could
accept.
This is pretty significant - I would consider detailing it an
answer if this wasn't
already accepted.
Good teachers
accept words students are
already familiar with as right
answers, but great teachers push for precise academic vocabulary.
I apologize for being redundant, because this question has
already been asked, but the
answer given was never
accepted and didn't actually
answer the question being asked.
The flow of
answers typically drops, if not stops, when an
answer is
already marked as «
accepted.»
Happily, in America this question has
already been asked and
answered by a number of major religious organizations and evangelical groups that are on record as both
accepting the science of climate change and supporting action at the public - policy level.
On the other hand, if you
already have picked an
answer, and are just interested in making it sound like your
answer is plausible by invoking a lot of things that might be confounding to the
accepted answer while deliberately not looking (because if you look you might learn that you are wrong), well then, how exactly can any «debate» or «discussion» proceed?
That people refuse to
accept the findings of these inquiries suggests that they have
already formed a conclusion and will
accept no other
answer.