The Supreme Court has
already ruled on the matter of ratification timing in Coleman v. Miller, finding:
In May 2010, the company filed a motion to have the class action dismissed on the grounds that the courts had
already ruled on that matter.
Not exact matches
Judge Cote
ruled this week (PDF) that the brief they
already submitted — which «contains five pages of substantive arguments that do not address the question of whether leave to file amici curiae responses is appropriate, but rather oppose approval of the proposed Final Judgment» — will suffice as B&N and the ABA's only comment
on the
matter, and «no additional filings from the ABA and Barnes & Noble shall be permitted.»
From the article:... SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters)-- Google Inc is
already getting requests to remove objectionable personal information from its search engine after Europe's top court
ruled that subjects have the «right to be forgotten,» a source familiar with the
matter said
on Wednesday.
I suspect that the real heavy lifting in enhancing access to justice is a
matter of procedural reform — specialized decision - making bodies with extremely simplified procedural
rules for specific civil law issues (something that actually
already exists in certain areas such as Landlord / Tenant, but could be further improved upon), wider permissions for over-the-counter motions, fewer unnecessary court appearances, fewer procedurally - mandated appearances (e.g., going from a Case Conference to a Settlement Conference to a Trial Management Conference, and possibly further, before you can get to a family law trial), and so
on.
In a fifth case the Supreme Court issued its final judgment
on a
matter that had
already been sent to Luxembourg for preliminary
rulings on two occasions; it concerned the limitation period applying to claims brought against producers of goods (O'Byrne v Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd [2010] UKHL 23).
IPCO took the
matter to the Court of Appeal which
ruled that enforcement should be granted
on the basis that the Gordian knot caused by the «sclerotic» process of the Nigerian proceedings should be cut, and referred the
matter back to the Commercial Court to decide whether the alleged fraud could provide NNPC with a public policy defence under s103, and should NNPC be allowed to challenge enforcement
on those grounds, further security of USD 100 million had to be provided (in addition to the USD 80 million it had
already provided).