Sentences with phrase «already seen the question»

I already saw this question in a previous comment, but I'd also like what kind of camera and attachments you carry on a journey like this.

If you have already seen the question coming and know the answer, you will put yourself in a position to stand out from the other candidates.

Not exact matches

«Investors can pepper them with questions to which they already know the answers, but they're interested in seeing how the entrepreneur thinks.»

Certainly, we have seen employers who have a program already questioning whether they should adjust their support to the program, whether it's a pension plan or DC plan.

He refused, saying that he already had shared information with the British authorities and saw no reason to do so with a private company — especially one whose own activities might be called into question.

If you already own crypto and living with the frustration of seeing bitcoin tumbling from its near $ 20,000 high, you are probably inclined to bury your head and ignore the question all together.

Think I did clarify already but you have not seen or maybe you had another question but then i might have not seen?!

With the help of a professor he persisted, and ultimately came to see the book as an incredibly rich source for thinking about questions that had already occurred to him: Why not engage in a life of hedonistic sexual pleasure, as Augustine did, and as everyone around him was currently doing?

So, without repentance a person dies in their sin.The next question was, I see that he / she is not converted, that he / she has not made a «decision» for Christ, but doesn't he / she already have the knowledge?

Someone may have already asked, but where can we see or take the entire 32 question quiz.

So to paraphrase: Your sins are already forgiven, so repent and be baptized and then you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit??? Do Baptists and evangelicals really believe that sinner's have already had their sins washed spotless in the blood of Christ, however, they still need to repent and be baptized in water to receive the Holy Ghost??? See what happens when we start questioning God's choice of words?

We have already seen, however, that removing the question of the appropriate content of the gift leads to absurd results.

Alise: First, I just want to say that I love this question, because it already indicates a deeper understanding than we often see when talking about mixed faith relationships.

[On this whole question of a pre-existent Man, see the book to which reference has already been made in connection with the idea of the Son of Man: Kraeling, Anthropos and Son of Man.]

Never in my life time have I seen a President questioned on his religion, let alone after he's already declared it.

Few theologians would answer this question negatively, and in our day many of our most gifted theologians, including Runyon, see the universality of Christianity in terms of its necessary and inevitable expression in a historical process of secularization, a process that has perhaps already triumphed over the religious world of the East.

There is no question in my mind that this reality and this process will grow and intensify at a pace even faster than we have already seen as we move further into the next century.

The only question is whether this understanding is necessarily bound up with the cosmic eschatology in which the New Testament places it — with the exception of the Fourth Gospel, where the cosmic eschatology has already become picture language, and where the eschatological event is seen in the coming of Jesus as the Word, the Word of God which is continually represented in the word of proclamation.

oopsie I see you already answered this question further down... sorry

I saw people already asked this question, but still i don't get it.

My name is actually Bree as well I was about to message Jocelyn, but I see you already asked my question!

I see Shelley already answered your question about the different flours (she's so smart... and incredibly thorough!!).

This might be a question you have already answered, but from the comments I read, I didn't see it.

Have seen now that you have already answered my question in the initial write up!

whether for the right or wrong reasons, our leader chose to stay on when things took a turn of sorts... a new owner arrived on the scene, plans for a new stadium emerged and Wenger became the bearer of bad news... he sold us on a new story, one that required patience on our parts... financial constraints were the order of the day, so that the enormous sums spent on the new venue could be recouped... although some would question the validity of such claims, why wouldn't they believe their faithful leader... according to those within the hierarchy, the future never looked so bright, as this new home would ensure our place among the elites for years to come... as we all know now these claims were a well constructed fabrication and so those who feel they were duped in the process are infuriated and rightly so... the fact that this club and it's manager have continually misled the fans, especially following Gazidis's claims about our financial liquidity, simply rubbed more salt in an already gaping wound... this surely isn't how you treat your «family», especially when they supported you through the supposed «lean» years... it was a dirty trick played by Kroenke but the fact is was orchestrated by Wenger himself hurt the most... as for those in the media, many of whom are former players or longtime pundits, who observed the early years firsthand, saw this as the perfect opportunity to vent the anger they felt towards this pretentious man once and for all... all in all, karma's a bitch

My question is, should I remove it after seeing what atrocious performances he puts in lately playing for our beloved Arsenal Fc almost like he's already a Man City player or keep it till he's sold by January or June 2018?

To your closing question I knew Robertson was a very good buy because I saw him play in Hull City and already very impress.

When we see the other premier clubs have already taken fc - monaco players and it raises the question what approach are we taking at these negotiations.

Chiles has been handed the duty of presenting England's World Cup campaign this summer, but has already seen his credentials come into question after exclaiming «welcome to Rio» despite the game being played in Miami.

As Allen sees it, his main duty at Cooperstown will be to answer questions from fans and writers, and to meet that end he already has several projects under way.

I was already spending a lifetime thinking of the proper reply to his question, when I saw that you had it taken care of in just a few micro-seconds.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

As reported by The Mirror, the German who refused to celebrate after his late penalty save saw Arsenal reach the Champions League final because just getting there was not enough, has already been questioning the current players about why the form that saw us beat Chelsea to win the FA cup was not on show at the crucial stage of the league campaign.

(a genuine question)-- I only looked at the videos on youtube and I don't see what he brings to the team which we already do not have.

«Because of the question, you see it has changed already, from outside the view is it is decisive for this or that, but in the end we came here in the position [we are in] because of the football we played, [just] as Mo came here because of the football he played.

These questions will surely be discussed in the Suns» front office up until next month's trade deadline, but after seeing ESPN report on both Damian Lillard and Kawhi Leonard earlier this week, it kind of answers the question for everybody already.

Check to see if your question already was answered by reading previous Michigan football mailbags here.

When Georginio Wijnaldum signed for a fee of # 25 million, many saw him to be another attacking midfielder within the side, raising questions about what he could bring to the table given the current array of talent already at Klopp's disposal.

Ask a coach a question or see if someone has already asked your question with our Frequently Asked Questions section.

You can ask questions or search all the topics to see if your question has already been answered before.

Read on to see some of the Motherboard questions we've already answered and write your own question in the comments so we can get on it!

You can also read the many many questions I have already answered to see the quality of my reply and get lots of ideas.

Not only that, but this issue should be one of the major policy questions that need to be put to all the candidates in the upcoming Labour leadership debate (as I have already pointed out on this site) as requested by Sunder (see What are the difficult questions the leadership candidates need to answer?).

«But it's not really a question of quality, it's a question of opportunity,» Stu Loeser, Mayor Bloomberg's former press secretary, said, explaining he didn't see a plausible upcoming seat for her in New York, which of course already has two Democratic senators and a Democratic governor.

At first, I was more interested in the candidates» responses than in the questions, but that rapidly changed — within the first half - hour, I was already excited to see each new clip.

@chirlu it is usually expected for the people posting questions to do a minimum search to see if it is already answered.

«Obviously, the state comptroller should be respected,» de Blasio said, referring to what many Democrats saw as Cuomo's demeaning attacks on DiNapoli after several of the comptroller's audits questioning the effectiveness of the governor's already controversial economic development projects.

I don't see how the German Maut is important for that question, also it doesn't need to be rolled out anywhere - huge parts of the EU have it already.

Question after question saw Cameron twist the structure of PMQs and demand Corbyn go further in disowning Hamas, although he had already Question after question saw Cameron twist the structure of PMQs and demand Corbyn go further in disowning Hamas, although he had already question saw Cameron twist the structure of PMQs and demand Corbyn go further in disowning Hamas, although he had already done so.

The Panelbase survey was commissioned by the Scottish National party (SNP) and leads with two questions which could be seen to tilt opinion towards supporting independence, but its results suggest that critics may be unwise to have already written off the «yes» campaign.