Sentences with phrase «also called pointed»

Gothic arches, also called pointed arches, are narrow and pointed at the top.

These are also called Points and Discount Points.

These are also called Points and Discount Fees.

They also own Aer Lingus (which also calls their points «Avios»), and 2 low cost European airlines, Vueling and LEVEL.

Although it operates its own frequent flyer program called Iberia Plus, it also calls its points «Avios.»

These courses, also called Point and Insurance Reduction Programs, can be taken online or in a classroom.

Not exact matches

Leone's colleague was also called to rescue a group of university students who had packed themselves into an elevator car, overloaded the car to the point where the system initiated an emergency shutdown, and then overheated so that one student passed out.

There was also a great book that was written by Andrew Grove called Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points That Challenge Every Company.

It can also be helpful to have sales in renewal calls, as well as other touch points along the customer journey.

Also note: Negative calls to action (ones that reference pain points) can be quite effective.

As Cosmopolitan points out, you can also simply order a vanilla bean frapp with two pumps of pumpkin sauce for what they call a «lighter version.»

Gottlieb also pointed to the the 10-fold increase in calls to American poison control centers related to kratom - containing substances between 2010 and 2015.

The company, by that point, had also begun considering how it might be able to manufacture its new «solar roof» product in Buffalo, which led it to reassess whether it should actually be producing Silevo's so - called «flat - plate» modules at all.

At this point Limited Partner B, also with a $ 2 million primary commitment, is unable to meet the future capital call obligations for the remaining $ 1.6 million of unfunded commitment and decides to offer the interest for sale.

Whitman took exception to the notion that the PC is dead, but also pointed out that it calls its PC division the Personal Systems Group, which encompasses a variety of devices with a variety of operating systems.

In the case that you pass, the policy beneficiaries should file a claim with the insurer, after which point the circumstances of your death will be reviewed and receive the payout (also called a death benefit or the face value of the policy) so long as everything is in order.

He also pointed to the growth opportunities in international markets, calling it the «worldwide defacto channel.»

If as you say you have talked to others who claim to be Atheist the way you describe it then they are IDIOTS who also don't understand Atheism and yes at that point since they are claiming «no God» to be true, then by all means call their point of view a «religion».

It is worth pointing out also that Scripture calls wisdom «a tree of life» (Prov.

I also understand that those who don't share your point of view (like JT and LouAZ) feel it necessary to discredit your thought by calling you names and acting like 2nd graders themselves; but, you should expect as much from commentors like that.

In 1864, Louis Pasteur proved that point in one case, showing that spontaneous generation (that life could originate from nonliving matter, also called abiogenesis), though accepted by some in the scientific community (such as Belgian chemist Jan Baptist van Helmont about 200 years earlier, who also believed that the basic elements of the universe was just air and water), was untrue.

In response to Mary's question how she, a virgin, could bear a child, Gabriel points to the miracle of Mary's relative, Elizabeth, who «has also conceived a son in her old age; and she who was called barren is now in her sixth month.

And we are also called upon to carry their viewpoints on the environment to other partners -LRB-...) and to defend these points of view.

Firstly, it must be remembered, that he disclaims very early in the book that he can only speak for the mainline denominations with which he is familiar, and although my memory may fail me, he implies that he can only speak for his observations of the churches / leaders with whom he is familiar, and also that he may be wrong, and also, that he is only pointing out what he calls a possible cause for the problems he has seen, and hopes that his suggestions / ideas, will be considered, researched, etc, and that time will tell if his thesis bears any truth or not.

Calling for «a return to foundations» can be immensely helpful in pointing out and even reigning in the worst aspects of liberalism, but these solutions can also slip into abstraction, becoming frustrated gestures at a hazy and diffuse dilemma.

This is to davidnfran hay David you might have brought this up in a previous post I haven't read, but i did read quit a bit about your previous comments and replies at the beginning of this blog, so I was just wondering in light of what hebrews 6 and 10 say how would you enterprite passages like romans 8 verses 28 thrue 39 what point could paul have been trying to make in saying thoughs amazing things in romans chapter 8 verses 28 thrue 39 in light of hebrews 6 and 10, Pauls says that god foreknew and also predestined thoughs whom he called to be conformed to the image of his son so that he would be the first born among many brothers and then he goes on saying that neither death nor life nor angels nor rulers nor things present nor things to come nor powers nor hight nor death can ever separate us from the love of god in christ jesus so how would i inturprate that in light of that warning in hebrews 6 and 10,

Also you think calling me a hypocrite somehow proves your point, whatever that even is?

Thus one could ask the authors exactly how often and at what points the Trinity must be called «Father, Son, and Holy Spirit» without compromising the faith; one could also ask feminists how often and in what contexts one could invoke that naming without supporting male dominance.

I should also follow them with an account of the traditional view of death, judgment, heaven, and hell, the so - called last things, as they have been interpreted in the historic Christian theologies, although once again I believe that the process of demythologizing is necessary at this point also.

But without pursuing the thought to this extremest point, we here merely call attention to the fact that, although the degree of consciousness as to what despair is may be very various, so also may be the degree of consciousness touching one's own condition, the consciousness that it is despair.

Jacobs also points to what he calls TEC's elevation of tolerance as the sine qua non of the church.

In a poll taken by Christianity Today in 1957, for example, among members of the Protestant clergy who chose to call themselves conservative or fundamental, 48 % affirmed that belief in Scripture's inspiration also demanded a commitment to its inerrancy, while 52 % said they were either unsure of the doctrine of inerrancy or rejected it outright.1 Discussion within evangelicalism concerning the inspiration of Scripture has usually focused on this point: whether or not Scripture is inerrant.

He asks why «no word of condemnation comes from any Arab regime regarding the murder of innocent Iraqis on a daily basis» and points out that «so - called Muslim community leaders... have also failed to condemn these killings of fellow Muslims, while finding every «contextual» excuse for global Islamic violence.»

I can also write down the stuff I dream up and call it scripture and point to it like you like to point to the scripture that you believe in.

If in our time we have seen a great people brought near to the point of extinction, we are also witnessing in Israel what can genuinely be called a resurrection of an ancient people.

Our historical transcendence depends on God's offer to communicate himself; for our spiritual transcendence is never merely natural but always surrounded and carried by a dynamic of grace that points towards God's nearness; in other words God is not only present as the horizon of our transcendence that ever refuses itself, but also offers himself as our direct possession in what we call deifying grace.

Justin also points to Galatians 5:13 - 14, which reinforces the Christian teaching that followers of Jesus are no longer bound by the Law and says, «You, my brothers and sisters, were called to be free.

The reintegration of science, metaphysics and theology lies in the direction of showing that observation gives rise to questions that science answers, but that these themselves raise questions that call for metaphysical responses, and that these in turn point to a different kind of explanation which, though ultimate, is also personal.

Luke also, after inserting his account of the call of the first disciples, rejoins Mark at this point.

This was never going to last, since heresy and relativism had, of course, never disappeared from the «papal agenda» and neither — perhaps more to the point — had his (and his predecessor's) analysis that disunity in the modern church was the result of a clash between two different interpretations of the Council itself, one right, the other wrong: as Benedict once more explained it, as his first Christmas as Pope approached in December 2005, «On the one hand, there is an interpretation that I would call «a hermeneutic of discontinuity and rupture» [i.e., the line peddled by The Tabletfor thirty years]; it has frequently availed itself of the sympathies of the mass media, and also one trend of modern theology.

This refers not only to other historic religions, which also produce high fruits of human achievement — whether or not in as great numbers or with as much efficiency as Christianity we are not concerned to say at this point but to movements and influences not ordinarily called religious.

Eigen also points out that biological systems generally operate near what Kauffman calls «the edge of chaos»» — that is, it usually happens that certain small changes will lead to disintegration of a quasi-species.

But in the same context Whitehead points out that, despite this multiplicity, it is a matter not only of unified behavior but also of consciousness of a unified experience, so that the explanation [260] called for by the «miracle of life» consists precisely in this unification.

Reynolds also highlights some of Akyol's oversimplified rhetoric, as when he calls the Paul / James divide «historical fact,» and questions some of Akyol's debatable assumptions about the prominence of Jewish Christianity in Muhammad's Arabia (a point that Reynolds is especially qualified to debate).

But I immediately went on to add that it is the only self - understanding explicitly authorized by Jesus whom Christians assert to be the Christ, the point of their assertion being that it is also the very self - understanding implicitly authorized as the authentic understanding of our existence by the mysterious whole of ultimate reality that they call by the name «God.»

A bridging point with Muslims could be to explain that «sonship» is also found in the Koran, in Sura 2:177 where a «traveller» is called «vibn ul sabeeli» which means «son of the road».

They are also engaging, as Schindler points out, in a «clericalism» which disproportionately emphasizes the importance of priests and the importance of the masculine: «Common to... «clericalisms» is a lack of sense of anteriority, and primacy, of the feminine in the call to sanctity.»

Any genuine struggle for justice could only begin at the point where such limits are called into question and where the rights of one are seen also as being valid for the other.

Furthermore, the whole creation itself, both what we call nature and also the realm of historical happening, is for the biblical writers open at every point to the action of the living God.

Paul points out that what separates those who are PERISHING from those who are SAVED is that the saved were saved via faith in the message of the cross which is also called «the gospel» (1:17, 18, 21)??