Sentences with phrase «also defendants in the case»

Redlich's opponent in the 2010 race, Carl Paladino, and his former campaign manager Michael Caputo, are also defendants in the case.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara on Monday charged Skelos with corruption charges that include extorting real estate execs and a environmental firm to enrich his son, Adam, also a defendant in the case.

In a press conference after the meeting, however, Department of Civil Protection official Bernardo De Bernardinis, also a defendant in the case, struck a more soothing tone, saying that the situation posed «no danger» and urging residents to relax.

Not exact matches

Bounce then followed this up with a second case — this one filed in a Texas court in April 2016 — repeating these allegations, also accusing Yieldify of patent infringement, and adding some of Yieldify's customers as defendants.

Circuit Judge Dorothy Kirie Kinnaird also continued to prohibit the defendants in the case — current and former Park District officials — from any attempts to reform the district's controversial police department.

Marc S. Dreier, brought in through Raymond A. Joao of Meltzer Lippe after putting 90 + patents of mine in his own name, is also a Defendant in my Federal Case.

The criminal complaint charging Seabrook and his fellow defendant, hedge - fund manager Murray Huberfeld, strongly suggests that a witness who is cooperating with the government in the case, Jona S. Rechnitz, could also serve as an important witness in at least one of the fund - raising inquiries centered on NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio.

She cited the state's pending cases against former Erie County Democratic Chairman G. Steven Pigeon and defendants in the Buffalo Billion program as the kind of prosecutions she will also emphasize.

Skelos is charged with extorting money from a real estate company and environmental firm to aid his son, Adam, who also is a defendant in the case.

The same court also threatened to arrest the minister, who is the first defendant in the case, if the stop word order continues to be pursued.

The judge also dismissed charges against the other 14 defendants in the Verona part of the case.

The defendants also argue that the plaintiffs failed to prove they are members of a «suspect class,» which basically means plaintiffs didn't prove that school districts harmed a specific group — in this case, minority kids from low - income families — by moving ineffective teachers into schools populated by members of the group.

All of us involved in the case — recall that Jesse Rothstein and I served as the expert witnesses on behalf of the plaintiffs, and Thomas Kane of the Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) Project and John Friedman of the infamous Chetty et al. studies (see here and here) served as the expert witnesses on behalf of the defendants — knew that all of the plaintiffs» claims would be tough to win given all of the constitutional legal standards would be difficult for plaintiffs to satisfy (e.g., that evaluating teachers using their value - added scores was not «unreasonable» was difficult to prove, as it was in the Tennessee case we also fought and was then dismissed on similar grounds (see here)-RRB-.

Also, unlike the U.S. (and civil cases in Canada) the defendant is customarily addressed as «the accused.»

Similarly, «the effect of feral cats on the environment,» which Defendant has proffered also will be the subject of Mr. Clark's testimony, is not relevant in this case and should be excluded.»

In his lawsuit, Simon - Whelan says that defendants in his case also enforce their control over the market for Warhol works through a select group of powerful galleries and dealers who enjoy a special relationship with Fremont, the foundation, and the authentication boarIn his lawsuit, Simon - Whelan says that defendants in his case also enforce their control over the market for Warhol works through a select group of powerful galleries and dealers who enjoy a special relationship with Fremont, the foundation, and the authentication boarin his case also enforce their control over the market for Warhol works through a select group of powerful galleries and dealers who enjoy a special relationship with Fremont, the foundation, and the authentication board.

Lawyer - clients come up frequently with institutional clients where in - house counsel is the client contact and in legal ethics cases where lawyers are respondents or defendants; they can also be the client in any other matter where an individual is the client, as lawyers do have lives too.

Also, the court noted that the nuisance was ongoing, so the People did not unreasonably delay in bringing the action and there was no prejudice to the defendants: a greater prejudice, resulting from lost evidence, resulted to the People than the Defendants in defendants: a greater prejudice, resulting from lost evidence, resulted to the People than the Defendants in Defendants in this case.

While it's hard to feel sympathy for corporate defendants, who often have net worth in excess of a million dollars, at the same time, the complexity of their cases also entails substantial legal fees.

As part of that case, Conversant also sought (a) a declaration that the offers which it had previously made to the defendants were FRAND and (b) in the event that the Court ruled those offers were not FRAND, a determination of the terms which would be FRAND.

We also act in cases where innocent third parties are affected by orders made in criminal cases against defendants.

[71] Plaintiff's counsel submits also that in this case, the defendant denied liability for the accident in the Response to Civil Claim.

The group, which also includes professionals in the firm's Washington, Chicago and Phoenix offices, has handled litigation in more than 30 states in cases ranging from putative nationwide class actions and mass actions for personal injury and property damage to complex environmental investigation and / or remediation issues and matters involving multiple defendants and hundreds of products.

Also, just in case anyone was looking for some procedural clarity, we also are told that «a statement of reasons is important,» perhaps especially so if a party «argues that the Guidelines reflect an unsound judgment, or, for example, that they do not generally treat certain defendant characteristics in the proper way.&raAlso, just in case anyone was looking for some procedural clarity, we also are told that «a statement of reasons is important,» perhaps especially so if a party «argues that the Guidelines reflect an unsound judgment, or, for example, that they do not generally treat certain defendant characteristics in the proper way.&raalso are told that «a statement of reasons is important,» perhaps especially so if a party «argues that the Guidelines reflect an unsound judgment, or, for example, that they do not generally treat certain defendant characteristics in the proper way.»

In addition to bolstering the plaintiff's case, experts may also address weakness or inconsistencies in the defendant's defensIn addition to bolstering the plaintiff's case, experts may also address weakness or inconsistencies in the defendant's defensin the defendant's defense.

Melissa has also served as an Assistant Public Defender in Broward County where she represented indigent criminal defendants charged in a variety of cases ranging from misdemeanors to first degree felonies.

But in this case, the defendant, Samsung, has recently also been quite aggressive in its SEP assertions.

Our Law.com blog compatriot Howard Bashman is also following developments in the case and posting the legal pleadings, including the complaint, the Web site owner's motion to dismiss and affidavit, and now defendant Alesia Roskov's answer and counterclaim.

The study also showed that, during a 16 - year span from 1988 to 2004, less than 9 percent of the 2,042 cases lost at trial and appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals were reversed for plaintiffs in employment discrimination cases, compared with a 41 percent reversal rate for defendants who lost at trial.

(paragraph 9 point 1) The court also noted that there were «no generally acknowledged practices for preserving, documenting or securing electronic evidence», but on review, even the defendant's expert described the plaintiff's practice in this case as «picture perfect.»

And thus, in the case at bar, the Defendants also have the protection of the implied undertaking, as far as it goes, which is not that far, because the deemed or implied undertaking does not apply to evidence disclosed in open court.

The injunction sought here also effectively prevented the defendants from transferring the allegedly defamatory material to another server or domain, a broader approach than what has historically been used in online defamation cases, but one which arguably better protects the plaintiff's rights.

In many cases the defendant who caused the slip and fall will try to argue that you were also negligent.

So in a pure uninsured motorist case where the other driver either can not be identified (hit - and - run or phantom vehicle are the most prominent examples) or has no insurance, your own insurance company essentially steps in the shoes of the defendant, assuming the at - fault driver's liability for the accident but also his damages.

In determining the appropriate damages to award, Justice Stinson drew from the purposes in awarding damages in sexual battery cases, as the defendant's conduct in the present case also offended and compromised the plaintiff's dignity and personal autonomIn determining the appropriate damages to award, Justice Stinson drew from the purposes in awarding damages in sexual battery cases, as the defendant's conduct in the present case also offended and compromised the plaintiff's dignity and personal autonomin awarding damages in sexual battery cases, as the defendant's conduct in the present case also offended and compromised the plaintiff's dignity and personal autonomin sexual battery cases, as the defendant's conduct in the present case also offended and compromised the plaintiff's dignity and personal autonomin the present case also offended and compromised the plaintiff's dignity and personal autonomy.

That's a point made by Doug Berman at the Sentencing Law Blog («Rather, I wish primarily to urge anyone and everyone defending President Bush's sentencing determination in the Libby case to explain why all these less prominent defendants — most of whom are now locked in a cell while Libby now makes plans for the paid lecture circuit — don't also merit some executive sympathy»); Ellen Pogdor at White Collar Crime Blog («But what is bothersome here is that one elite individual is receiving this benefit while others with comparable circumstances will not have this benefit — it all comes down to who has access to the President.

In the case of large corporations doing business nationwide, this usually meant that a plaintiff had a large number of states to choose from in which a defendant could be sued on any matter whatsoever which also facilitated the filing of class action lawsuits with plaintiffs from all over the world covered by a single lawsuiIn the case of large corporations doing business nationwide, this usually meant that a plaintiff had a large number of states to choose from in which a defendant could be sued on any matter whatsoever which also facilitated the filing of class action lawsuits with plaintiffs from all over the world covered by a single lawsuiin which a defendant could be sued on any matter whatsoever which also facilitated the filing of class action lawsuits with plaintiffs from all over the world covered by a single lawsuit.

She also notes that since defendants are not required to provide an evidentiary record at this stage, a plaintiff may not have more than the information disclosed in a company's public filings and the hope of finding a whistleblower to put forward its case.

Punitive damages are also available in many jurisdictions to punish defendants in those cases involving particularly egregious conduct which demonstrates a reckless or wanton disregard for the safety of the public.

They may also read the classic ethics case, Spaulding v. Zimmerman (263 Minn 346 (1962)-RRB-, in which a lawyer learns that the plaintiff in the case where he represents the defendant suffers from a potentially fatal aneurysm.

When determining what percentage to award, the judge referenced not only the two factors in the defendant's favour, but also considered the claimants» complaints of the defendant's conduct throughout the case, including but not limited to the defendant's failure to answer a pre-action protocol letter, its failure to disclose relevant documents, and its rejection of settlements and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) offers.

This is achieved due to: a more comprehensive knowledge of the most very recent peer reviewed literature, my prior research and also practical expertise in each subject, the sheer degree to which each and every case is investigated (described by one defendant (in 2016) who was acquitted, as being «relentless»), and the ability, as a result of long experience in dealing with very complex cases, to produce concise effective reports to tight deadlines, even in the most complex and demanding cases, often where expertise in several different areas is urgently required.

In the case of explosives the practical military experience of making and testing improvised explosives devices, (at times when such activity was authorised by the Secretary of State for Defence), having instructed others in the creation of such devices, the rehearsal of the use of such devices under circumstances parallel to those that defendants are accused, actual use of clandestine recipes, and also chemical expertise in the synthesis procedures used in explosive preparation, are all critical to being able to assist the court in such matterIn the case of explosives the practical military experience of making and testing improvised explosives devices, (at times when such activity was authorised by the Secretary of State for Defence), having instructed others in the creation of such devices, the rehearsal of the use of such devices under circumstances parallel to those that defendants are accused, actual use of clandestine recipes, and also chemical expertise in the synthesis procedures used in explosive preparation, are all critical to being able to assist the court in such matterin the creation of such devices, the rehearsal of the use of such devices under circumstances parallel to those that defendants are accused, actual use of clandestine recipes, and also chemical expertise in the synthesis procedures used in explosive preparation, are all critical to being able to assist the court in such matterin the synthesis procedures used in explosive preparation, are all critical to being able to assist the court in such matterin explosive preparation, are all critical to being able to assist the court in such matterin such matters.

Also, since there is a right to counsel for indigent defendants in criminal cases, when a lawyer withdraws (especially for non-payment) the court now has to determine whether or not the client is indigent (which non-payment would typically support an inference of) and if so, the court must appoint a new lawyer who would have to do lots of redundant work to get up to speed in a case.

These can also be issued in anticipation of unlawful conduct by the defendant i.e. to prevent that harm occurring in the first place - this type of injunction is common in (domestic) violence cases to such an extent that their use has been legislated (codified).

We also represent individuals and companies who are defendants in injury cases, giving us a unique perspective when we craft a case for our clients.

In many cases, juries may also assess punitive damages as a means to punish the defendant health care providers to prevent similar future negligence.

In this case a hearing will take place before a District Judge, and the Defendant also has the opportunity to serve a defence (and if appropriate a counterclaim).

In a 2013 case, the Supreme Court of Florida determined that a wrongful death lawsuit is derivative in nature, so any defense that a defendant could claim in a case brought by the deceased could also be used in a case brought by the survivor of the deceaseIn a 2013 case, the Supreme Court of Florida determined that a wrongful death lawsuit is derivative in nature, so any defense that a defendant could claim in a case brought by the deceased could also be used in a case brought by the survivor of the deceasein nature, so any defense that a defendant could claim in a case brought by the deceased could also be used in a case brought by the survivor of the deceasein a case brought by the deceased could also be used in a case brought by the survivor of the deceasein a case brought by the survivor of the deceased.

While the Court understands that counsel for the Defendant is a law professor, and that he believes this case serves an important educational function, counsel must also understand that he represents a client in this litigation — a client whose case may well be undermined by the filing of frivolous motions and the failure to comply with the Rules.