You claim that «the duty
to advance the cause of
justice and the rule of law, as well as
to undertake measures
to facilitate access to justice and protect the public interest, is
also synonymous with a duty
to «promote».
Third, and bringing together normative and pragmatic angles, not only has the Canadian legal profession in general, and many of the provincial self - regulatory organizations more particularly, opened up a policy - making space for considering how
to reformulate the future of legal services
to improve
access to justice, but
also, the provincial self - regulators all have an implicit and, sometimes, as in the case of Ontario, an explicit duty
to facilitate access to justice in their regulatory activities.
Not only would such a model help address concerns about post-graduate articling positions and work experiences, but it would
also help
facilitate the
access to justice and technology focuses of the proposed law school.