Sentences with phrase «also heard the arguments»

Lawmakers also heard arguments about a bill that would ban the sale of puppies coming from so - called puppy mills.

I've also heard the argument There's no denying that black men have a preference for thick women.

I've also heard the argument that KU has basically created a two - tier system.

She also hears arguments asserting that the adolescent has only the «vaguest notion» of what could happen to him if he does not receive blood, with the reasoning being that the information would be too distressing for an already seriously ill boy.

«You also heard that argument in the late 1990s, after the U.S. market had done really well for a decade,» says Keith Matthews.

I have also heard the argument that the User is causing the Service to commit an illegal act, hence the User is responsible (even though no contract was signed by the user).

The court will also hear arguments next week in a case attacking eBay, the global marketplace.»

We've also heard the arguments that there is no evidence that alternative business structures increase access to justice.

Not exact matches

Next week, the Supreme Court will hear arguments for two cases that will decide whether your business is equivalent to a person, and whether companies can also seek exemptions from federal law based on religious beliefs.

* But there is also a valid policy argument that companies that own both cable channels and cable wires have excessive power over pricing, and that blocking such a merger is a good use of anti-trust power — even if it's an argument you'd usually hear from the left side of the aisle.

It is also a matter of political common sense: If you want an argument to be heard, engaged, and accepted, you make it in a language that those you are seeking to persuade can understand.

It may also become increasingly difficult for any argument against any research on early embryos to command a hearing (including arguments against «therapeutic» cloning) as other procedures that involve embryo selection and disposal become more common.

Also, I have never ever heard anyone say that this argument is an argument for the existence of god.

I also argue that Evangelicals are open to changing «dogma,» but not if the arguments heard are just a repeat of old failed arguments.

I also hear capsaicin is soluble in alcohol (one of his arguments) but beer doesn't have that much alcohol so that shouldn't make much difference.

I hear that he has also had an argument with his agent regarding staying at Arsenal for the final year of his contract.

I've also heard time and time again similar arguments that «I got by just fine with XYZ so they don't need».

I also think it would be appropriate to have one ebook restricting itself to the average arguments women everywhere are hearing, and (if anyone had the patience) a separate point - by - point rebuttal of the more involved arguments upon arguments.

Also at 9 a.m., parents and students from Middle Village Preparatory Charter School in Queens rally outside the Queens County Courthouse before oral arguments are heard in its case, 88 - 11 Sutphin Blvd., Queens.

First, fiscal discipline is fundamental to Labour's thinking and policy development, underpinning every proposal we make, every argument we advance — not only because our wider message will not be heard if people see us only as spenders, and not also as reformers — but also because we simply will not be able to deliver the changes we want to make in government if we do not have strong public finances.

Also at 10 a.m., arguments in the ongoing effort by former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver's attorneys to overturn his federal corruption conviction will be heard, federal courthouse, Foley Square, Room 1703, Manhattan.

He also can not be deported if he dies, an argument recently made by his solicitors at his court hearing.

Jacobs, who also told the court that «I want to file additional proofs of evidence, and intend to call more witnesses», then urged the court to fix a date for hearing of arguments with regards to the application challenging the court's jurisdiction, brought by Membere's counsel, Osaro Eghobamien, SAN.

A case is also currently pending with the Supreme Court, which heard arguments earlier this year on whether the state's congressional district lines — drawn by an independent redistricting commission — are unconstitutional.

Last week, the petitioners, which also include the Legal Aid Society, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the New York Civil Liberties Union, submitted a motion for preference to the appellate court, asking that arguments in the case be heard by the end of June.

An update on the court's website posted this afternoon says the panel will hear oral arguments on the motion to dismiss the suit and also calls on attorneys to update the court on the status of the U.S. Department of Justice's preclearance process.

Meanwhile, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance has another panel hearing arguments that the mayor and his closest political assistants deliberately circumvented campaign finance laws in their failed 2014 effort to flip the State Senate to the Democrats, by directing donors (many of whom also had business before the city) to funnel money into upstate party committees instead of into candidates» individual campaign accounts — thus bypassing state contribution caps.

Then, of course, there is the Japanese paradox - also known as «they eat rice all the time and live a long time so I should be able to eat pizza and Doritos and live to be 100 too» (exaggeration but I've heard some arguments very close to that)

Even when using subjective data, Eden's arguments don't stand up to scrutiny, a point made by Daniel Losen of the Civil Rights Project at UCLA during testimony at a December hearing held by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights at which Eden also testified.

I've heard arguments that say all powers and items should be able to be picked up via grinding, and I do agree with that, but it's a very delicate balance between making something attainable through grinding, while also delicately balancing at what point it's «okay» to charge for the convenience of not grinding.

One must also confess that upon hearing about the Abstract Expressionists and their intense debates and arguments about art at their famous «8th Street Club,» or afterwards at the Cedar Tavern, one tends to get a bit nostalgic and envious.

I hear echoes of «Wilson's Law» above, and also some resonance with articles I've written focusing on how environmental and animal - welfare groups, while often working toward shared goals (an end to whaling, for instance) rarely use the same arguments, with one focused on population statistics and the other on ethics.

Also, I've heard convincing arguments for burning peat in place of coal — fewer toxins, etc..

Also on the air: C - SPAN covers and archives argument before the Supreme Court, which yesterday heard the current challenge to EPA carbon regulation.

Furthermore, since roughly 10 % of Canadians are hard of hearing, a statistic similar to the number of Canadians that don't have access to a computer, oral arguments should also be banned.

The court has, in many cases, been prepared to hear argument and see evidence from them (usually on limited issues) and has also been prepared to consider costs awards against them and in their favour depending upon the outcome of their involvement.

The economic importance of the cases heard by the GC is also such that the cost of the CJ's proposal is not a significant argument one may raise against it.

Meanwhile, the 3rd Circuit just heard argument in the case of Justin Layshock (also see How Appealing for a roundup of posts).

The Crown also sent three other journal articles to the judge and defence counsel, before the court asked to hear further legal arguments.

Obviously in doing so she relies on the justice system to respect its own systems and procedures, but she also makes whatever arguments she needs to in order to ensure that it does so, and that those procedures and structures allow her client's case to be heard.

It's also the same argument going back and forth at a government committee hearing into Ontario's new Human Rights Tribunal (and on blogs covering and commentating on it).

AG Bobek further points out, and thereby strengthening his arguments to limit the possible places of jurisdiction to two, that if 28 courts in as many Member States could be competent to hear the case for the respective damage caused in these Member States, all these courts could also order injunctions, which would most likely differ in nature and scope, and might, even worse, be contradictory (para. 130).

One recent publication said: «David Markus is amazing, not only because of the strength and genius of his arguments and motions, but also because of his brilliant and astonishing performances during the hearings.

Do not get me wrong, I hear the argument that by applying a deduction in favour of any mitigatory earnings while also holding that employees need not accept the first job the comes along (see comments in my post The Duty to Mitigate: Employees Not Required to Accept a «Bird in the Hand») a two - tier system is created the favours the wealthy.

Also, before your hearing, both parties can also give the judge written arguments as to why they should Also, before your hearing, both parties can also give the judge written arguments as to why they should also give the judge written arguments as to why they should win.

Aside from the glasses issue, Harris also argued on appeal that prosecutors wrongly shifted the burden of proof to the defense in closing and rebuttal arguments by stating that the jury had not heard two sides to the story and that «there is no evidence of innocence to undercut the United States» evidence.»

The WCB may also appear at Appeals Commission hearings and will usually do so when an appeal includes argument concerning the application and interpretation of legislation and WCB policy.

But as civil justice fans everywhere also know, today is the day that the U.S. Supreme Court is hearing arguments for what could be the most consequential case of the term (and one we've been blogging about for months!)

I am also skeptical of the argument, advanced by Joseph Avray on behalf of the advocates» society, that the hearing fees are wrong because it is somehow impermissible for the government to charge for what is «a public good» — understood not in its strict economic meaning, but simply as something that benefits society as a whole.

But a different argument, advanced by the West Coast Women's Legal Education and Action Fund, was to the effect that the right of access to courts was a component of the right to liberty, and maybe also of that to the security of the person, protected by section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and that the hearing fees infringed this right contrary to principles of fundamental justice, due to their disproportionate effect on women and the least well - off.