Not exact matches
It
also creates
less compression of the spine and
less torque in the knees, which makes it particularly useful for those with back or knee injuries or limitations.
Also, this
torque will depends on the quality of the air (I mean the
less denser, more denser with the oxygen molecules)...?
Downsizing was first introduced with VAG and Peugeot 1.4 lt turbo engines which replaced the 1.6, 1.8 and in some cases the 2.0 lt petrol engines, with
less emissions and more power and
torque, something that they had to do in order to compete
also with the smaller diesel engines.
Also coming this year is the 760Li, powered by another first: a twin - turbo, direct - injection V - 12 that displaces 6.0 liters, pumps out a monumental 535 hp and 550 lb - ft of
torque, and powers the 7 to 60 mph in
less than 4.5 seconds.
The deeper and wider the V - tread channels, the greater this pumping action, but a large - grooved V - tread is
also going to have
less torque transfer to the ground and reduced braking traction since the grooves takes away contact surface of the tire to the ground.
However, the ZR1
also has an electronic throttle delivery tuned to deliver
less immediate gobs of
torque during the beginnings of throttle travel.
The CVT» box
also marks a change from the lowlier six - speed manual car's 50:50
torque split to a
less - appealing - sounding 60:40 front / rear split.
There's
also the fact that a V - 8 engine seems promising'til you realize that the higher displacement still gives you
less torque and horsepower than the twin - turbo V6 in the new Lincoln SUV.
The
torque curve is
also a beneficiary of the changes, a quick peek at Corradi's internal Ferrari document revealing that it is substantially fattened up between 3000 and 4000rpm, peaks slightly higher than in the F430, and keeps its advantage, albeit to a
lesser degree, all the way to the red line.
It
also delivers the same
torque as the GTS (383 lb ft) but boasts 20bhp
less, sprints to 62mph in 4.8 sec (against the GTS's 4.4 sec) and is 1mph slower, at 177mph.
Maybe it's the gear ratios, but the RS 3 feels like it lacks the
torque of the TT on the road, and its firm suspension
also bounces the car around more on mid-corner bumps — even in Comfort mode — making you
less confident to drive fast.
The Sonic was
also unable to confidently trump the Swift in fuel consumption figures, with the Suzuki being largely more economical under duress, and only slightly
less economical under regular driving — the Suzuki sipping 6.3 l / 100 km, whilst the effortless
torque of the Chevrolet helped it to figures of 6.2 l / 100 km.
of
torque, slightly
less than F - 150's 400 lb. - ft., but still an increase over the current Edge Sport, which
also uses the 2.7 L, albeit tuned to 315 horsepower and 350 lb. - ft.
The GTI exhibits the much
less torque steer, but
also has about 50
less horsepower to deal with.
Gasoline engines are identical to the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu: a 1.5 L turbocharged inline four - cylinder (I4) engine that produces 170 horsepower (12 hp
less than the 2.4 L engine in the previous Equinox but more
torque), a 2.0 L turbocharged I4 engine that produces 252 horsepower (48 hp
less than the 3.6 L V6 engine in the previous Equinox), or a 1.6 L turbo - diesel I4 engine that produces 136 horsepower (the latter will
also be available in future Chevrolet Cruze models as well).
The differences in feel between old and new engine specs is
less obvious than the chassis, but there's 39bhp extra, if no additional
torque at 509 lb ft. Despite its 730bhp being just 10bhp shy of the hardcore Aventador SV, the philosophy is different: the SV's 100 kg weight loss gives it permission to focus more on power, where Lamborghini's engineers have
also targeted driveable
torque for the S.
As before, the system
also changes its
torque split based on the drive mode, with up to 90 % of
torque flowing rearwards in Sport mode,
less in Strada (Street) and Corsa (Race) modes — the latter to prioritise clawing grip for faster lap times in the most hardcore setting.
The all - wheel drive system is
also tuned to be more rear - biased, and sends
less torque forwards when you decelerate.
Torque is
also down, though to a
lesser extent, to an even 260 from 269 pound - feet.
The Ford Focus ST is
also less squirrelly and gives
less torque steer than the older «Speed3.
Mercedes will
also offer a «
less powerful» version of this engine, which makes 462 PS and 600 Nm of
torque.
The Accord Sport trim level, equipped with larger 19 - inch wheels and making slightly more horsepower and
torque, is
also slightly
less efficient, at 26 - city / 35 - highway and 30 mpg in combined driving.
The powertrain refers to an 898 cc engine with
less power — 69 horsepower and 91 Nm of
torque, but can
also be had with an improved 89 horsepower and 135 Nm of
torque.
With
less power at the front wheels,
torque steer and tire squeal are reduced
also, along with, naturally, acceleration.
The Bugatti is
also ten years older than the Rimac, packing
less power and
less torque while carrying almost the same weight.
The Camaro
also weighs 200 pounds
less than the previous model year and has 60 more horsepower and 80 more pound - feet of
torque, giving it a better power to weight ratio.
It
also might be nine horses
less than the gas motor, but the electric motor twists out 18 more foot - pounds of
torque, providing a slightly zippier experience hunting for various scenic locations around San Diego proper.
That ¹ s
less power than the 507 Coupe makes, true, but the Audi
also features AWD, a dual - clutch transmission, bigger wheels and tires, plus a trick
torque - vectoring rear differential.
Volkswagen was
also able to fine - tune the ESC software on this basis: even though the traction control intervenes later in the Golf GTI Clubsport S and the
torque is reduced
less, when it does intervene, the «wheel hop» of the front wheels, typical of powerful front - wheel drive cars at maximum acceleration, is practically eliminated.
At 267 pound - feet, the V6 has a smooth
torque delivery that's good for relaxed driving, but the turbo - fours that the competition has switched to tend to make more
torque at lower RPMs and rev more freely, which
also somewhat explains the Acura's
less lively street performance.
This
also benefits the four - cylinder turbo engine (2.0 T), despite a decrease from 274 hp to 245 hp (with 3 percent
less torque, at 260 lb - ft).
It
also gets more
torque, to the tune of 590 lb - ft, though that's still
less than the mighty AMG's 627 lb - ft.
This modern Lamborghini
also happens to be the most affordable member of the Italian family tree, featuring a window sticker of
less than $ 240,000, but that bargain pricing doesn't lock you out of thunderous horsepower: the all - wheel drive Huracán LP 600 - 4 delivers 602 ponies and 413 lb - ft of
torque from its naturally - aspirated 5.2 - liter V - 10.
It
also gives the RS an additional technical edge over the recently updated but mechanically
less sophisticated Golf R, the Volkswagen relying on a regular Haldex - style all - wheel - drive system with brake - activated
torque vectoring in place of mechanical locking differentials.
This engine,
also to be used by corporate brother Porsche, makes more low - rpm
torque, at least on paper, and weighs 31 pounds
less than the outgoing supercharged engine, which helps improve front - to - rear weight distribution compared to the previous car.
Also the engine, now to AM29 spec has been revised with a little more power and
torque but incredibly
less emissions and better fuel economy due to the new Bosch engine management system.
Granted, following an upgrade to meet Euro 6 emissions standards — which
also brings a quoted «three to four per cent» improvement in fuel economy — it makes slightly
less power and
torque -LRB--3 kW / -4 Nm).
It's really quick, as Schaeffler says it covers the 0 to 200 km / h (0 - 124 mph) sprint in
less than 7 seconds, but it should
also handle beautifully thanks to selective wheel drive and a
torque vectoring system.
The S5 has more power but
less torque, and it
also comes standard with automatic braking.
BMW's 335i is $ 6000 cheaper, but rear - wheel drive only — and
also produces
less power and
torque than the Volvo.
Despite the meagre power output, the city car
also produces 658Nm of
torque (with an 896Nm peak)- only 4Nm
less than that generated by the V12 - powered Mercedes S63 AMG, which weighs approximately three times as much as the MOTIV.e.
Automatic transmissions
also provide
less miles per gallon than manuals as they use a
torque converter to alternate between gears.