Sentences with phrase «also logarithmic»

It's also logarithmic, like the... [Read more...]

Not exact matches

In addition the display also needs an accurate (pure logarithmic power - law) Intensity Scale, and an accurate White Point.

In order to produce high Absolute Color Accuracy a display also needs an accurate (pure logarithmic power - law) Intensity Scale, and an accurate White Point.

On the other hand, I'm also guessing the attrition rate would be logarithmic, not linear.

Also, it is a logarithmic scale.

Any increase could be at most logarithmic, and this is also generally agreed by all sides.»

I should also have given a more complete list of the problems with your objections: in this case your «totally unsuitable» is contradicted by three papers: Arrhenius's 1896 paper proposing a logarithmic dependence of surface temperature on CO2, Hansen et al's 1985 paper pointing out that the time needed to warm the oceanic mixed layer would delay the impact of global warming, and Hofmann et al's 2009 paper modeling the dependence of CO2 on time as a raised exponential.

This also explains (along with the logarithmic forcing effect of CO2) why a runaway greenhouse didn't occur: with a dimmer sun, high CO2 is necessary to stop the Earth freezing over.

Also, the last 25 % have a smaller effect than the other 25 % increments due to the logarithmic nature of the dependence of the forcing on the CO2 mixing ratio.

At the surface the CO2 is also saturated which is why the line broading is so important and why the logarithmic curve is so flattened after 250 ppm.

You'll also want to understand what being «logarithmic» means and how that applies to CO2.

There is NOT a «logarithmic input of effect» by «water» as the energy inputted to Kinetic Induction is also powering Turbulence, such energy NOT being measurable as «temperature» of the mass being «moved» and this is in precedence to any measure of «temperature» especially in a Gas, but also in a liquid.

When i also included the effect of the analysis described in my first post on Jennifer's site I then got an almost perfect agreement to a logarithmic response.

I have also recently made a fit of the Hadley data using a simple logarithmic AGW model (DT = 2.5 ln (C / C0)-RRB- based on Mauna Loa data plus natural oscillations of 60, 11 and 9 years.

Many scientists who know this stuff far better than I have done the analysis and they all agree that successive increases have a logarithmic effect, which my physical analogy also has.

It is also not some universal constant for doubling CO2, but rather is unique to the modern atmosphere and can change with different overlap with other gases, or even at different CO2 concentration regimes (the logarithmic forcing breaks down for example at very low or very high concentrations).

In order to produce high Absolute Color Accuracy a display also needs an accurate (pure logarithmic power - law) Intensity Scale, and an accurate White Point.