Deniers will
also move the goalposts on the definition of a «specific policy».
Not exact matches
The
goalposts can
also move because of unforeseen issues.
Osborn
also implies that I should have raised the inadequacy of their data in previous criticisms and that this is
moving the
goalposts on them.
[I'd
also bet that when it reached 16.5 years a new study will come out challenging Santer et al. and
moving the
goalpost to 25 + years.]
But I'm chasing
moving goalposts at this point because as I save, the prices are
also climbing.