Since the ocean surface is has
also paused in warming, either short wave solar radiation is warming the ocean, or the deep ocean is not warming.
Not exact matches
Gerald Meehl, a climate scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research who was
also an author on the paper, said this research expanded on past work, including his own research, that pointed to the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation as a factor
in a
warming slowdown by finding a mechanism behind how the Pacific Ocean was able to store enough heat to produce a
pause in surface
warming.
The study
also examined anomalies during the «
pause»
in global
warming that scientists have observed since 1998.
Our point was not to focus on 1998;
in fact,
in the longer version of our article that we sent to Nature we talk explicitly (and cite heavily) the work that has pinned the «
pause» to shifts
in El Nino / La Nina cycles and we
also prominently mention the high latitude
warming.
As totally an other issue I
also wish you are right
in your estimate and hope
warming would not take a
pause at this time.
The corresponding intensification of the atmospheric Walker circulation is
also associated with sea surface cooling
in the eastern Pacific, which has been identified as one of the contributors to the current
pause in global surface
warming.
That would help explain the slowdown
in surface
warming but would
also suggest that the
pause may be only temporary and brief.»
The error margins are so wide you could even assume that the manmade cooling matches or exceeds the manmade
warming (both from fossil fuels) which was what led to the ill - fated ice age scare
in the 70's that modern
pause - deniers
also like to deny even happened.
Obama
also said there was a «
pause in American leadership» related to fighting global
warming without actually coming out and saying he was talking about Trump's plans to withdraw from the Paris accord.
Also, using the same cherry picking approach as used by «skeptics» for the recent time period, based on which they claim a «global
warming stop» or «
pause» because of lacking statistical significance of a
warming trend, I even could claim a «
pause»
in global
warming from 1979 to at least the end of 1997.
Prof. Judith Curry (another IPCC author)
also believes that the failure of the climate models to predict the «
pause»
in global
warming indicates that the IPCC has substantially underestimated the role of natural variability
in recent climate change, e.g., see here, here, here or here.
These show progress, and
also how the Left's dogmatic adherence to its... Continue reading Good news: the
warming pause finally appears
in the news as journalists learn about science.
Not only does this contradict all the doomladen climate models cited
in the IPCC's various reports — none of them predicted the so - called «
Pause» — but it
also means that not one of the kids
in school being fed climate propaganda by their on - message teachers has ever personally lived during a time of global
warming.
2) The 18 year
pause without
warming (Strike 2) As atmospheric CO2 is increasing with time, the delta T (increase
in planetary temperature due to the increase
in CO2) should
also be increasing with time.
The
pause in warming also appears to be incompatible with heat relaxation from past forcing reaching temperature equilibrium.
The model ensemble
also could not accommodate the «
pause» or «slowdown»
in warming between the two large El Niños of 1997 - 8 and 2015 - 6.
This
also dismisses any role for internal variability (PDO, AMO, etc) that might account for part of the
warming of the 1980s - 1990s, though they do trot these out to explain away the
pause (ie, natural variability can only explain unknown cooling, not
warming in this approach).
What do you call the mental process which allows a man to say «What's firmly established is that the climate is
warming» while
also holding that «There's been a burst of worthy research aimed at figuring out what causes the stutter - steps
in the process — including the current hiatus /
pause / plateau [
in warming] ``?
To make it even more interesting, many «skeptics»
also argue that none of the temperature records showing climate change are valid, even as they argue that those same temperature records show a «
pause in global
warming.»
Dr Schmidt
also denied that there was any «
pause» or «hiatus»
in global
warming between the 1998 and 2015 El Ninos.
Also, even if there was a statistically significant
pause in the surface temperature rise that would not explain why the world wasn't
warming.
I hope that we may well be nearing the brink of having within humanity's grasp, not only strong inferences about the recent, relative decadal reduction
in the rate of surface
warming (compared with the final quarter of Century 20), but
also with a more compelling story about the true
pause which stretched across the middle of that century.
In comparison, we do nt have an alternative and simple theory of climate change that can explain the
pause, and be consistent with a
pause, and «
also» explain the 50 years of
warming, and the specific characteristics of the
warming, sea level rise, and numerous other data.
nj:
In comparison, we do nt have an alternative and simple theory of climate change that can explain the
pause, and be consistent with a
pause, and «
also» explain the 50 years of
warming, and the specific characteristics of the
warming, sea level rise, and numerous other data.
It is
also interesting that the «birth» of recent global
warming in the» 70's
also coincided with China's building another million person city every six weeks until earlier this decade (and when did the tapering off occur relative to the «
pause?»).