And we have also exchanged a player (Sanchez) who has had issues in the changing room but
also his playing style with his best asset for assist making (Ozil) is not really clicking fully.
Not exact matches
«We want to sustain our legacy and continue to not only be an iconic landmark with our barn -
style headquarters, but
also remain an iconic company in the sectors we
play in and service for another 75 years.
He's apparently never to blame for the onedimensional (tactical) game approach regardless of the opponent and he's
also never to blame for overplaying his players causing mid-term injuries like Ozil, Koscielny, Giroud most recently and Ramsey last year (I'm excluding Wilshere because his injuries are foremost due to his reckless
playing style and behavior vs other players).
One of the biggest things achieved by Arsene Wenger at Arsenal in recent years is the formation of a plan B, something that many football observers were beginning to believe was a foreign idea to the prof.. It is still true that the boss wants his team to
play in a certain
style that is fluent, exciting and easy on the eye but he
also wants to win and that need has forced him into a change of tactics.
Many times this referee - induced
style of rough
play brought amusing results and, happily,
also evoked a large measure of good sportsmanship, which each team practiced with only rare exceptions.
As for Giroud I hope what I'm hearing is not true.You get the feeling that once Lacazette starts scoring he just won't like it.He's
also another overrated player who's
also hear because of Wenger's kindness.Apart from the fact that he's good with his head I don't see the positives of keeping here and even Welbeck.We need players who can push Lacazette to perform and these are just not the players.They are more of rotation players.Do you think if Welbeck and Giroud were at top form they can challenge Laca at his best?I always laugh at our strikers though.On one hand, one doesn't fit our
style of
play but at least he can finish.On the other hand, the one who fits our
style of
play can't even score a goal.I can't believe we are joking with such a crucial role.I'm sick and tired of seeing average strikers in the club.It's been painful watching the likes of Bendtner and Chamakh already.Now I have to cope with this.
He
also noted Olivier Giroud as «a player I admire in terms of his
style of
play.»
goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own
style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His
style of
play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and
also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?
Liverpool
also have room to improve and Klopp has had a chance to put more of his stamp on the squad and its
playing style.
The 25 year - old is
also wanted by a number of other clubs, but he seems the perfect fit for our
style of
play, and could bring some much - needed Premier League winning experience with him.
If Arsenal continue to
play this modest
style of football, like they did in the second half against Everton, like they did for the entire 90 minutes against Manchester City, I expect both Ozil and Sanchez to leave the club, their decision
also looks a collective one.
We need a new striker for a number of reasons — Need an upgrade — We
also need depth — And tactics with different
styles of
play.
I'll go a step further if Van Djik hasn't signed for Liverpool I would try to make a move and here is why: 1) Prem experience 2) Southampton
plays a similar
style of football than Arsenal 3) He can
play in both a 3 and 4 man defense with his ability on the ball 4) Mustafi has been up and down and I don't know which one we're getting ahead of next season and will it be for 38 weeks 5) Mertesacker will go into a non
playing role 6) Chambers has
played well at Boro but well enough to
play a big role into this team... not really and could be used in any deal for Van Djik 7) Koscielny is our best defenders but is dealing with a chronic injury not only that he hasn't made the best decisions at times Everything mentioned above will free wages but
also increase Wenger money to spend!
It was
also the fact that Liverpool were
playing well, with their
style of high tempo game to break the Arsenal game down.
Not the forward i was looking for i really wanted Lukaku or a Benteke, i actually think arsenal needed a forward that would compete with Giroud and the hold up
style of
play, with the additional pace (a Sebastien Haller
also).
Also, get a
playing method that compliments those players, the
playing style and the team.
he
play 2 games for france get that rustyness out and come bk for us ready to go wether its starting or off the bench... im
also glad perez we have a whole week to train and get use out
style of
play before he's thrown in
It will
also mean a more direct
style of
play, the standard «out - ball» will be the threaded pass through the middle and this will come earlier than we are accustomed to in any passage of
play.
The experienced Dutch manager
also brought in the players to plug the games in the squad and encourage United to
play in his preferred
style.
Part of that
style of high press
play is that it
also needs mid season fitness, and a team just coming out of preseason can easily not be fit enough to keep the pressure up effectively.
That's
also what makes it the most jarring of the Kart games for players who aren't used to the
style of this particular entry: it's the only one of them my wife refuses to
play with me, as my Super Mario Kart muscle memory remains strong, and there's just not much you can pull from experience with the rest of the series to help you combat that.
The likes of Manchester United and Arsenal have
also previously been linked with him, but he seems the ideal player to slot into Liverpool's current attacking
style of
play.
However, derozan and Lowry were
also willing to change
style of
play.
Also in both size and
style of
play Shane is the closest thing to Colt on campus.
Naturally, aside from his physicality, height and defensive solidity, he's
also comfortable on the ball which is a requisite for any Barcelona player, defender or attacker, in order to fit in and
play their
style of football.
We do have the French centre forward Olivier Giroud but his abilities are much different to the Chilean's and so even though he is a good option who has been in good form he is
also a very different one and the Gunners would have to change our current
playing style.
I am
also of the view that Giroud is considering his France place in the world cup, which will be less guarantee if he
plays on the bench at arsenal, it would be unfortunate to lose his skills, teams most be able to mix there attacking threats against different defensive
styles of varying oppositions.
I
also agree with his philosophies we don't have players that dive, surround referees & we mostly
play a
style of football that is great to watch.
Arsenal
also undoubtedly have the most favoured
style of
play out of all the sides as well, with Aubameyang liking to
play quick football with plenty of passing and a range of different chances created.
Now thinking about the
style that won arsenal trophies we had physical / technical midfielders and we had wide players who could
play the forward role easily who were
also equipped with pace and technical ability.
Giroud reminds me a bit of Dimitar Berbatov, as a matter of fact I am wholeheartedly convinced Giroud is Berbatov in disguise, because he is the only striker I have witnessed who can go more than two months without a goal and finish amongst the top 3 strikers in the Premier League, completely similar in
style, both very classy finishers, brilliant hold up
play they are
also both lazy as hell and occasionally turn up in random clusters of games which 80 percent of the time are worthless in the hopes of winning any silverware, but do just about enough to convince you that they are better than they are.
He would
also fail miserably IMO because he only knows one
style of
play and would not get enough time with the England team to install that
playing style.
It
also is vital for a strong possession game because it gives the player with the ball an outlet and someone to
play the one - two
style that we use a lot.
Also, United had a year for Mourinho to settle and for his current squad entrenched and become familiar with his
style of
play.
The season
also provided evidence of another major change, as The Gunners
played an attractive brand of football, far - removed from the
style of
play employed by George Graham, which was regularly greeted by chants of «Boring, Boring Arsenal.»
Also at the level of international football tactics are even more important than in the PL were you can hope to beat lesser teams with your own
playing style.
The 56 - year - old has largely worked with squads of players superior to this Liverpool one, but he
played a large part in building that famous Milan side that won the European Cup twice under his reign, and
also took a declining Chelsea side to a new level without any real signings of his own, showing how much influence he can have over a team's
style of
play.
I like that he's a rounded player, for a while now it was one or the other, it'll be good seeing someone who relishes the physical side but
also has the
style to suit Arsenals
play.
Depends
also on team system and
style of
play as to what the ideal photo - fit is for your man leading the front line.
N'Zonzi is good at winning the ball back but we are Arsenal, we should be aiming for someone who can
also play the right
style football as well as defend, Coquelin was a ball winner but look how people wanted a ball winner with technical ability when he
played.
for me i am jst so shocked that arsenal have a set
style to dominate and when they are dominated by munich or barca (games you expect to be chasing shadows) there is just no plan B — they do nt hold there shape they do nt do anythign urgent if anything solidified my want for wenger to go was Wednesdays performance — another year gone and no progress made
also the lack of depth — ozil needs to be dropped but who replaces him??? — we cant replace him so we just keep
playing him and hope he comes good again
Also barcelona's
style of
play is built around possession with pass and movement, barca players do nt really take more than one touch before moving into a different position to receive the ball or draw the man and because they press intently after losing the ball it is not as vital that all players are correctly positioned.
The Frenchman surely still has something to offer at the top level, and his experience and unselfish
playing style are
also attributes that could make him a perfect like - for - like replacement for Sanchez in attack.
Clifford was
also impressed by Stephenson's development as a player from raw rookie to near - All - Star, and for his unselfish
style of
play.
I support you on the fact that Araenal need a player who can make an immediate impact.However, it's
also naive to try to create an impression that he's going to fail due to similar
playing style and stature of the players you mentioned above.Even Eduardo would have world class and possibly better than Van Persie if not for his leg breaking.It's likely Mbappe is going to succeed and if he gets signed up by another club we'll be chasing him on the future.The same gamble being taken on Mbappe is the same that was taken on Henry.If Henry had failed I don't think Arsenal would've been this great club today.This is a very similar situation to Mbappe.Weneed players now to have an immediate impact but we should not be inclined to think Mbappe would fail if Arsenal should sign him.
Napoli do
play with a very attacking
style, while the Gunners
play a more possession - based
style, and his current side
also play with a very attacking front three, compared to our one.
He might be our Cristiano who
also changed his
playing style and we all know what he does.
The «Arsene out» Brigade might decry that as fueling the owner's coffers, and to a certain extent they have a point, but it
also speaks volumes for the manager and the attacking, technically gifted
style of
play that he espouses.
WIth the the amount of time he's been out and the severity of his injury,
also taking in to account his age, he may never return to be the little midfield wizard we love, his
style of
play comes from his ability to be able to turn on a six pence and weath in and out of people like they are ghosts, to go from being told he will never be able to kick a ball again to doing all that would be amazing but what are the chances.
Jose Mourinho has
also come under a fair amount of criticism so far since his arrival in the summer of 2016, with fans slating the former Chelsea manager for his side's negative
play style and failure to keep up with rivals City in the title race.