Sentences with phrase «also radiate heat»

But clouds also radiate heat back to earth since clouds are warmer than deep space.

I can relate to a lot of it, my husband also radiates heat as he sleeps and doesn't want to upgrade to a King yet.

Not exact matches

The vortex also loses energy by radiating heat.

Also in the mid-1990s, another group of scientists proposed the now widely accepted mechanism for how lakes can form under glaciers: Heat radiating from Earth's interior is trapped under the thick, insulating ice sheet, and pressure from the weight of all the ice above it lowers the melting point of the ice at the bottom.

Its proximity to the star might also make it easier to study, since the planet would radiate more heat and orbit more rapidly than any planets lying farther away.

«Our thermal overlay allows sunlight to pass through, preserving or even enhancing sunlight absorption, but it also cools the cell by radiating the heat out and improving the cell efficiency.»

These measurements may also shed light on the proportion of radioactive elements like uranium and thorium inside the Moon, since their decay produces heat and should increase the amount of heat radiated by the Moon, says Paul Spudis of the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland, US, who is developing radar instruments to fly on LRO and Chandrayaan - 1.

I would also suggest that now the extra latent heat of this autumn's fast Arctic ice recovery to ~ normal has started to fade (i.e. mostly radiating away to space), Wayne won't be able to claim many more «warmests in history» for a long time.

Many beds are made from recycled materials, and while there are electrically heated pads for pets, materials that trap natural body heat and radiate it back to the animal also are available.

«It's not just the colours that radiate in a Bonnard», writes Roberta Smith, «there's also the heat of mixed emotions, rubbed into smoothness, shrouded in chromatic veils and intensified by unexpected spatial conundrums and by elusive, uneasy figures.»

There's also a number of interesting applications in the evolution of Earth's atmosphere that branch off from the runaway greenhouse physics, for example how fast a magma - ocean covered early Earth ends up cooling — you can't lose heat to space of more than about 310 W / m2 or so for an Earth - sized planet with an efficient water vapor feedback, so it takes much longer for an atmosphere - cloaked Earth to cool off from impact events than a body just radiating at sigmaT ^ 4.

And I recall one can make ice in the desert the same way; a concentrating solar power plant could also create a «cold reservoir» by radiating heat away from some storage material at night, then dumping waste heat into that in the daytime, perhaps.

Also, if radiative limits are preventing tropical precipitation, wouldn't that just increase the height of the convection cell, if it can't radiate heat as efficiently?

Now, however, the extra CO2 does more than radiate away heat due to its own absorptive properties, but also can radiate away heat from the other source.

But that's actually an understatement by Gallup, since more than 97 % of the world's climatologists say that those carbon gases, which are given off by humans» burning of carbon - based fuels, are causing this planet's temperatures to rise over the long term, as those carbon gases accumulate in the atmosphere and also block the heat from being radiated back into outer space.

The increased effective radiating surface area of atmospheric CO2 would also act like a stepping stone for heat to leave the planet but how much cooling these effects have is anyones guess.

Also adiabatic cooling of convecting air, containing CO2, will radiate heat to a cooler area, ie above, not to the warmer surface.

LIA wasn't GLOBAL cooling; but colder in Europe, north America — because Arctic ocean had less ice cover - > was releasing more heat / was accumulating - > radiating + spreading more coldness — currents were taking that extra coldness to Mexican gulf — then to the Mediterranean — because Sahara was increasing creation of dry heat and evaporating extra water in the Mediterranean — to top up the deficit — gulf stream was faster / that was melting more ice on arctic also as chain reaction — Because Mediterranean doesn't have enough tributaries, to compensate for the evaporation deficit.

They also make snow less white, thereby reducing its effectiveness in radiating the sun's heat back into space.

Clouds cool the planet by reflecting solar energy back to space and also trap heat and radiate it back to Earth.

You also need a value that closes when the collectors are colder than the storage so natural convection doesn't send all your heat to the roof to radiate away.

These stem from a diversity of site - specific conditions, including, but not limited to: local vegetation; presence of building structures and contributions made by such structures involving energy use, heating and air conditioning, etc; exposure to winds, the wind velocities determined by climatic factors and also whether certain wind directions are more favored than others by terrain or the presence or absence thereof to bodies of water; proximity to grass, asphalt, concrete or other material surfaces; the physical conditions of the CRS itself which include: the exact location of the temperature sensors within it, the degree of unimpeded flow of external air through the CRS, the character of the paint used; the exact height of the instrument above the external surface (noting that when the ground is covered by 3 feet of snow, the temperature instrument is about 60 % closer to, or less than 2 feet, above an excellent radiating surface, much closer than it would be under snow - free conditions).

The AGW claim from the comic cartoon KT97 and kin The Greenhouse Effect says that Shortwave, (near UV, visible and near infrared, but mostly visible) heats up land and oceans, that no longwave infrared from the Sun gets through the invisible undefined and unexplained barrier said to be like the glass of a greenhouse, and then the Shortwave heated land and oceans radiate out longwave infrared, (which in real physics is heat, also called thermal infrared).

Surface heat will radiate downwards and also be moved by ocean currents.

The warmed surface radiates as a blackbody, and also loses heat through rising in air currents or evaporated moisture.

The proximity to buildings also altered the winds, and added heat radiating from the walls.

Since to me (and many scientists, although some wanted a lot more corroborative evidence, which they've also gotten) it makes absolutely no sense to presume that the earth would just go about its merry way and keep the climate nice and relatively stable for us (though this rare actual climate scientist pseudo skeptic seems to think it would, based upon some non scientific belief — see second half of this piece), when the earth changes climate easily as it is, climate is ultimately an expression of energy, it is stabilized (right now) by the oceans and ice sheets, and increasing the number of long term thermal radiation / heat energy absorbing and re radiating molecules to levels not seen on earth in several million years would add an enormous influx of energy to the lower atmosphere earth system, which would mildly warm the air and increasingly transfer energy to the earth over time, which in turn would start to alter those stabilizing systems (and which, with increasing ocean energy retention and accelerating polar ice sheet melting at both ends of the globe, is exactly what we've been seeing) and start to reinforce the same process until a new stases would be reached well after the atmospheric levels of ghg has stabilized.

adding a «radiating body» also add more conduction and then more heat lost.

Also, if it's a good reflector, heat will have to build up more inside than if it weren't, but not because it's radiating energy.

«To claim that since the shell «must» radiate inwards and outwards, that the surface necessarily will be heated to twice the 235 W level, since it is already at that temperature, and will also receive that amount of radiated energy is mindboggling.

Also forgotten is the 50W radiated by each human's basal metabolic rate, plus the heat of condensation of the water in each breath when cold enough.

«Clouds also block some of the longwave radiation that would be emitted back to space, so that a decrease in global cloud amount would increase the amount of solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface (more heating), but also increase the amount radiated back to space (more cooling).»

The surface won't warm up to where it was before, but also the heat loss slows as a result of only the net difference between the energy radiated from the surface and the energy «returned» from the atmosphere being lost from the surface.

I'd say that it is also possible to arrive at the temperature difference between the black body radiating temperature and the average surface temperature without any recourse to radiant heating (adiabatic compression by gravity) and same for the surface temperature on the surface of venus.

Because they are reflective, they also prevent energy in the form of heat from being radiated back into atmosphere, thus helping to cool the city as well as the planet by reducing the amount of energy trapped by the greenhouse effect.

Instead, presumably, CO2 is fairly evenly distributed all through the atmosphere - all around our heads and arms and legs - all the way up higher into the troposphere at every location in the troposphere - absorbing and radiating some of its absorbed heat to the also all - surrounding nitrogen / oxygen.

We also know that a body which is absorbing heat must radiate that heat in equal measure or it will warm.

I am guessing that heat radiating from the surface molecules of a solid also radiate in the same way within the solid.

«Those with fireplaces and wood burning stoves will also benefit from better heat distribution, provided the fan is correctly positioned to effectively circulate the heat radiated or convected by the stove or fireplace.

Radiating the heat from all of the cast iron oven surfaces simultaneously also ensures a kinder cooking process, unlike the fiercer direct heat of conventional cookers.