Sentences with phrase «also reads text»

Another important feature is the Uconnect Access system with 911 emergency services; this also reads text messages and sends dictated messages.

A glorified speakerphone that can also read text messages aloud, Martian watches are at least relatively inconspicuous, designed to look like classic analog timepieces, not mini — smartphones.

We then get radical Atheist that also read the text and see it the exact same as Rev Terry Jones and as foolish as him believe that all Christians must and have to believe the same as him.

It also reads my texts for me, notifies me of calls, wakes me up in the morning and also reminds me to get stepping throughout the day at work.

These can also read text that users type or copy and paste from other resources.

Text to speech will also read text to you, although some of the parsing is a little odd so it can be difficult to follow the narrative.

Not exact matches

«Confidential mode» also lets you specify whether your recipient will have to type a passcode they receive separately in a text message in order to read your message.

We've been gradually getting used to reading onscreen, in part because we increasingly read short texts, such as e-mails, blogs and Facebook updates, but also because today we use our cellphones as much (if not more) for reading and writing as talking.

While the system will link to a driver's phone and read a text message aloud, drivers can also read the message on the console — and they're also able to scroll through their contacts list on a screen as they drive.

We also added some eye candy for the people who like to look at infographics more than reading a long text.

I actually love reading RIchard Dawkins, but I also love reading passages from religious text as well.

And you also seem to be reading more into the passage than the text would warrant.

In the book, I make a brief but impassioned case for reading the text with the prejudice of love, a hermeneutic I believe was employed by Jesus, and, as many reviewers have pointed out, a hermeneutic that Augustine also favored.

He arranged for the Gospels and some other books of the Bible to be translated in common speech; also some texts of Saints Augustine, Jerome, Ambrose, and Gregory, arranged under titles which he called «sentences,» and which he read very often, though without understanding their import.

A close and careful reading of the Hebrew text also helps.

There are, of course, also many literary treasures of spirituality, for example even today we may well recommend reading St. Augustine) St. John of the Cross, Teresa of Avila or any well - edited selection of mystical texts.

Wuellner's stated goal is to examine «the need for rhetorical analysis not only of texts but also of the practices of reading texts.»

observer I have read an English Bible but am also smart enough to cross check the text with the original Hebrew BEFORE making wild as.sumptions and you quite apparently are not.

Finally, canonical criticism, which often describes itself as a theological mode of interpretation, may also be considered as a form of cultural hermeneutics, since it also puts into the foreground the community context within which the text was created and from which it is to be read.

I have read also that texts were found referencing his visits in Tibet.

This is a scholarly work and much of the discussion of texts and sources will be chiefly of interest to specialists, but the general reader can also benefit greatly from this careful reading of a personality and period decisive for the subsequent Christian story.

Beardslee sets the tone of the issue when he speaks of «reading of a text through a theory of propositions» (p. 35, see also p. 65); and Woodbridge summarizes the group's contention «that a text is a configuration of various linguistic symbols which tend to elicit «lures for feeling» technically called «propositional feelings»...» (pp.122 - 23).

and that just as you want them to listen to how you arrived at your conclusions regarding the text (and don't say, «I just read the Bible,» because you didn't), so also, that other person likely engaged in deep study of the biblical text to arrive at their understanding and it would benefit you to hear how they came to their understanding.

Disagree with the other person if you want to, but recognize that they are trying to understand and explain the text just as much as you are, and that just as you want them to listen to how you arrived at your conclusions regarding the text (and don't say, «I just read the Bible,» because you didn't), so also, that other person likely engaged in deep study of the biblical text to arrive at their understanding and it would benefit you to hear how they came to their understanding.

You will also discover that you will never completely grasp the full complex of meanings or spirit of the texts you read.

By contrast, a teaching such as the Immaculate Conception, as with so much Marian dogma, makes claims that not only stand on a highly contestable reading of an extremely narrow scriptural base but also seem to stand in tension with, if not even in contradiction to, significant biblical texts.

A careful reading of the Greek text, says Stendahl, «must lead to the translation: «And as many as walk according to this standard [the new creation in Christ], peace be upon them — and mercy also upon the Israel of God.»

I might also add that I was changed in the process of researching and reading this text aloud.

Mikics argues that, in contrast to most of the fast reading that we do, we also need to learn to read slowly and to ask good questions of the texts we read.

He has a take on angels, Satan, and demons which I have never heard before, and which seems to fit the biblical text in a way that, if true, would cause me to read much of Scripture in a whole different way, and which would cause me to view life, and governments, and cities, and politics, and animals, and plants and pretty much everything in a whole new way also.

@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth of Christ, Your interpretation of God at His worst shows a complete lack of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts of the New Testament were written in as to date there are no original copies available.Greek was the common language of the day.Most of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»

This is also how to read the OT texts.

See my note above, p. 153, on the textual reading here, and also my article, «Studies in the Text of St. Mark,» Anglican Theological Review, 20:103 ff.)

The triad «texts, symbols and practices» points to the fact that the life of a church does not only consist in the reading and interpretation of texts but also of symbols and customs, especially as they are used in worship.

It also implies a hermeneutics of suspicion «which perceives how self - interest, power, national or ethnic or class or gender perspectives can affect the reading of texts and the understanding of symbols and practices» (para. 28).

In today's One Verse Podcast, you will see why we can not read Genesis 1:14 - 19 as a scientific explanation of how the sun, moon, and stars came to be, and you will also learn from the text what three purposes these celestial lights serve in God's creation.

In this episode of the One Verse Podcast, you will see why we can not read Genesis 1:14 - 19 as a scientific explanation of how the sun, moon, and stars came to be, and you will also learn from the text what three purposes these celestial lights serve in God's creation.

I have also read as many of the sacred texts of other religions as I can find, something a True Believer would not, as a rule, do, since they have found the One True Religion, just as the followers of all other religions have.

Written in informed engagement with current debates over the possibility of knowledge and truth, this small book will reward careful reading also by those who may dispute the author's interpretation of biblical texts.

Also you may want to look more deeply into Christian history... and possibly read the bible with a more open mind... and even read other non-Christian religioush and philisophical texts

It must be said that many texts on creativity in Modes of Thought can be read also as stressing mainly the creativity of the concrescing occasion itself.

In many cases homiletical texts recommend a method of reading scriptures aloud to gain an experiential perspective on biblical texts and also to understand their bases in orality.

I have been reading, teaching, and writing A LOT these past several years on the violence of God in the Bible, and this book also provides the beginning place for understanding these violent, bloody texts in Scripture.

In this episode of the One Verse Podcast, you will see why we can not read Genesis 1:14 - 19 as a scientific explanation of how the sun, moon, and stars came to be, and you will also learn from the text what three purposes these celestial lights serve in.

Also, I liked how Logos added links to every Scripture text so that if you wanted to read a verse, all you have to do is hover your mouse over the reference, and the Scripture text pops up onto the screen.

When a text states that «Christ is God and man,» it must also be read literally despite its reason - violating message.

Does this also mean that I have to read Higginsâ $ ™, Masseyâ $ ™ s, and Kuhnâ $ ™ s sourcesâ $ ¦ the Egyptian original texts?

I have read of the publishing problems with children's books and also school texts in the US.

Continue to read your child books with predictable texts and familiar words, but also include those with a richer vocabulary and more complicated plots.

There is also the trademark littering of the text with classical allusions, as though we needed further reminding of which politician read Greats at Oxford.