Sentences with phrase «also understand the points»

While I get Sabio's intent, I also understood the point.

Being fluent in language means that you can not only speak the language, but also understand the points of view and get the humor of this or that nation.

I also understand your point about the Judge & OC taking a pro se litigant much more seriously and cutting the nonsense by the very presence of a court reporter.

Not exact matches

Asking more questions in your attempt to understand their point of view will also help diffuse the situation as you are showing a genuine desire to hear what the other person has to say.

It's also easy to prejudge the situations, intentions, and attitudes of the women who work at a place like Hooters, and to cry out «exploitation» without truly understanding, say, the point of view of an actual Hooters Girl.

I can understand why there might be questions about something new that's different, but we've really tried to do it from the point of view of the publishers, and we believe that we can create an environments that's actually really great for the publishers, really great for the readers, and also really great for the advertisers.

American diplomats — including some of those forced to leave Havana — also say that the department has also reduced its ability to see, understand and perhaps influence what is happening in Cuba at a potentially historic transition point.

If you are a retailer, you may also need to have an understanding of your inventory through a point - of - sale program.

Inspiring article to use longtail, we understand such keywords gives good traffic but at some point can it be negative (copied content) to use 7 - 8 longtail in same article as they can be on other sites also.

Very comprehensive, yet easy - to - understand, this business tool offers more than just the nuts and bolts of writing a business planthe author also provides invaluable insight through real - life examples illustrating key points and avoidable mistakes as well as cutting - edge information for the 21st century entrepreneur.

Understand also that the evidence pointing to steep market risk over the completion of this cycle is quite robust, as the valuation criteria in the overvalued, overbought, overbullish syndromes we now observe would be satisfied even if stocks were significantly lower than they are at present.

However, the pain point for many organizations is finding a holistic solution in one place that also provides understanding of the

However, the pain point for many organizations is finding a holistic solution in one place that also provides understanding of the true impact their efforts can have on the workplace.

Work with Investors and Raise Capital They are also able to always clearly answer the key questions: ▪ How much capital the need to raise ▪ What does success look like in 12 months ▪ Who is on the team and why ▪ Use of funds ▪ Who is in charge ▪ The go - to - market strategy ▪ How to recruit talent So for those who still feel compelled to build startups, a good starting point is to understand what it takes, and what the expectations are.

He also pointed out that even if what happened with Daniels was the sort of thing that was very common for Cohen as part of his duties, the Daniels scenario could still be a contribution if Cohen understood it would aid Trump's electoral effort.

Also, keep the words alongside your product short and sweet, with the most salient points easily understood at one glance.

Regardless of this, Bruce Fenton proceeded to point out that these organizations are not only inefficient when dealing with bitcoin, but that they also do not have a proper understanding of it, due to the ignorance towards the technology that they have reportedly showcased.

Also you don't seem to understand that I, along with the majority of atheist, were believers at one point.

It is so incomprehensible to understand how a company (Fortune Hi - Tech Marketing) that claims its mere existence is to help as many as possible, with help of the church, can also be so obnoxiously arrogant to believe they can manipulate the justice system to a point where they can push someone to death.

If as you say you have talked to others who claim to be Atheist the way you describe it then they are IDIOTS who also don't understand Atheism and yes at that point since they are claiming «no God» to be true, then by all means call their point of view a «religion».

The emerging understanding of how widespread sexual violence is, especially in conflict situations, also points to transmission routes; the potential for moral and pragmatic leadership by faith leaders is enormous.

I also understand that those who don't share your point of view (like JT and LouAZ) feel it necessary to discredit your thought by calling you names and acting like 2nd graders themselves; but, you should expect as much from commentors like that.

At least, it tells me that they at least have the mental faculties to understand that numbers, facts, science, and proof aren't on their side, there's no point in disputing it, but there's also no point in trying to change their mind.

Fourth (and related to the second point), his understanding of «forgiveness of sins» as only having something to do with our sins is also somewhat deficient (pp. 88, 136).

The prophetic declaration of a surviving remnant beyond the coming catastrophe must be understood in this light.14 If this points to Yahweh's negative action against Israel, it is also positive in its import.

A cultural starting point might well demand a «hermeneutical suspicion» (i. e., a distrust of one's previous reading of Scripture, given the possibility that such a reading conceals some of the radical implications of the Biblical message for our day), but it may also assist in the renewed hermeneutical task, allowing the Biblical witness to be freshly experienced, freshly understood, and freshly applied.21

Those who are leading us in this reflection point out that what is at stake is not only the nature of the authority of the New Testament but also our whole understanding of what it means to be Christians.

I just thought the book brought up some interesting points but I also understand that science is highly competiitive and political.

An Athanasius, inspired by a genuinely Christian monasticism, not only had a more (comparative to his times) wholesome understanding of human sexuality and marriage, as well as women s ministerial roles in the church, but also struggled (to the point of being expelled from his diocese five times by those supporting the imperium) for an orthodoxy which would confess the God revealed in Christ as a community of consubstantial Persons.

Critical scholarship — not only historical critical scholarship, but also newer approaches to the Bible using critical theory — has pressed our understanding of the texts and traditions of ancient Christianity to the point where organized Christianity, if it were to be guided by such work, would have to begin to rethink some of its basic theological commitments.

But it might also define a critical moment in our culture, a turning point in the nation's understanding of medicine, personal autonomy, and death.

You speak on what is «True Doctrine», could we also point to something such as the Consti; tution and the daily court room arguments of lawyers and clerks who feel that they alone know and understand the true meaning of the what the framers when they wrote the laws of this land?

Love also does not seek to point out sin in it's brother and certainly, not to cast a blanket of condemnation over a people of which the perceiver does not understand.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

Because of man's perverted self - understanding he does come into conflict with the Word of God, but a point of conflict is also a point of contact.

Moreover, choosing ideas which we also affirm may actually obscure the real point under discussion — that everything the Bible says about God is historical understanding.

Our columnist Kurt Willems tackles this question and also points us toward an understanding of apocalyptic references in Scripture.

There is here a double credibility test: A proclamation that does not hold forth the promises of the justice of the kingdom to the poor of the earth is a caricature of the Gospel; but Christian participation in the struggles for justice which does not point towards the promises of the kingdom also makes a caricature of a Christian understanding of justice.

He is also pointing out that in being a God who understands how we live we can connect to him in a way we cant with other gods.

Durkheim also was important to me in clarifying the point that ideologies are born in community and maintained there through regularly rehearsing those events that provide the symbolic paradigms through which members of the community understand themselves and their collective purpose.

But I immediately went on to add that it is the only self - understanding explicitly authorized by Jesus whom Christians assert to be the Christ, the point of their assertion being that it is also the very self - understanding implicitly authorized as the authentic understanding of our existence by the mysterious whole of ultimate reality that they call by the name «God.»

I don't really understand the point of a National Prayer Day, but I also don't get why it is seen as such a negative thing by people who don't want to participate.

However — and this is my point — we can not fully understand how that past actual entity may be said to he actual unless we also understand its role as a potential element in future concrescences.

My point here is that it blocks adequate understanding of community and therefore also of the common good.

In the process, Kugel also asserts that the existence of religion is best understood through the limitations of human existence rather than through the order in nature that points toward a Creator.

Their report also points out a parallel between the early church and the modern missionary movement in their understanding of the doctrine of the Trinity.

The practical fields have also organized into professional groups, with increased role definition established by competencies to the point that the understanding of the ministry itself can be defined in terms of professionalism.

The one who views the movie is always changed by the movie, whether they realize it or not, and also whether or not they understand that point the director was trying to make.

In the case of Paul VI's encyclical, Bristow points out that a true appreciation of the conjugal act «depends on the understanding that the human person is a unity of body and spirit, so that where the body acts the spirit is also present and vice versa» (p. 346).

[26] The Pope confronts the notion of marriage as the remedium concupiscientiae [27] saying that it must be understood in the integral sense of the scriptures which also teach of the Redemption of the Body and point to the sacrament of matrimony as a way of realizing that Redemption.