Sentences with phrase «also write the words»

Even though he also wrote the words, he did give us that creative freedom to find the truth in our characters.

«I also wrote the words on construction paper and had them arranged in piles — one pile in each corner.

Not only are students seeing a math word in context, they are also writing the words (which reinforces learning) and referring to them as a study aid.

Not exact matches

Reid also noted that while she doesn't think she wrote the posts, she hired cybersecurity experts to see if someone manipulated her words or blog, but «the reality is they have not been able to prove it,» Reid said.

Penned by journalist Michael Wolff, also famous for writing a scathing biography about media baron Rupert Murdoch several years ago, Fire and Fury took off like, well, wildfire as soon as word of its imminent publishing broke just a few weeks ago.

Simplifying biz - blab to the fewest number of words doesn't just make your writing crisper, it also habituates your mind to seek the simple essence of needlessly complex concepts.

«It's definitely testing an ability to write, but also an ability to think concisely and to be able to communicate an idea in a very small amount of words.»

Then, if you end up finding a teen - friendly bank, be sure to write a carefully worded letter to the bank that said no, letting them know that not only did you find a different bank to do business with, but you are recommending it to all your friends, who also want checking accounts of their own (business checking or otherwise).

The curriculum also includes a digital writing coach that is much like the spelling and grammar check in Microsoft (msft) Word.

Susan Wojcicki, CEO of YouTube (which is owned by Google), has also been critical of Damore's memo, writing in a column for Fortune: «What if we replaced the word «women» in the memo with another group?

You could also use a service such as The Readability Test Tool (read-able.com), an alternative to the Flesch - Kincaid tool that's built into Microsoft Word, which provides document - readability statistics, such as the grade level at which it's written and how many passive sentences it contains.

No is a powerful, productive word (James also wrote a book about it).

In other words, not only will you get more shares from writing articles of more than 1500 words, you'll also have a huge advantage over other bloggers (because you'll be in a small club of bloggers who comprise less than 5 % of all bloggers).

I appreciate the kind words, I honestly never thought I would get this involved with investing last year so its cool to see this thing grow, and to also write about it.

It's also helped us get the word out about the services and amenities that we offer to companies of all sizes,» WeWork President and CFO Artie Minson wrote in a company blog post.

the gay issue has many facets and can't be dealt with in cut and dried terms and what the bible has to say about it, what was going on when it was written, and the translation of certain words, also come into play.

Muneef, dear friend, the words you write also touch me in a special way, because I can sense the spirit in which you write them.

You however don't see your own hypocrisy in greater depth when you say that the bible was deliberately written to be sacred and holy, without ANY sourcing and you take the word of people who lived a really long time ago who also can not provide you with anything more than «eye - witness accounts» which have undoubtedly been changed, tweaked or even just falsly made up in order to cement their point.

In communion with the body of faithful Christians through the ages, we also affirm together that the entire teaching, worship, ministry, life, and mission of Christ's Church is to be held accountable to the final authority of Holy Scripture, which, for Evangelicals and Catholics alike, constitutes the word of God in written form (2 Timothy 3:15 - 17; 2 Peter 1:21).

Also, I couldn't quite get this into words as I was writing before, so: I am believe that I am correct in my view of Scripture as it has been handed down to me from teachers, preachers, writers and others; I believe that I am correct in my beliefs about who God is, and about His self - revelation, in the same way that all people believe that the opinions they hold are true.

You can also poke around on your Nook or Kindle — there are e-books there written for the faithful that give a detailed insight into the cult - like thinking (well, poor choice of words, a favorite LDS saying is, «the thinking is done», but you catch my drift) that's used to control their people from a very young age to find «the world» unbearable and the church to be a haven, etc..

No one said it better than Sam Harris, but I've also wondered why the Bible seems to have been written by a scribe in the 1st Century and not inspired by the word of an all - knowing and omni - present deity.

According to your ilk the bible is the word of your god, therefore everything written in it is also your god's word.

I read his post twice, and I wondered why he chose to focus in on a single word like «Sure,» without also telling his readers what I wrote about Mark's personality.

Her words are emblematic of so many of the posts in the synchroblog, sure, but it's also beautifully written, wise, wry, deep, beautiful, and honest about the mess and uncertainty that often accompanies our shifts.

Ahmad Khan was also involved in a controversy with the Christian missionaries which led him to write a commentary on the Bible, in which he showed that many Muslim religious scholars, such as Bukhari, did not believe that the words of the Old Testament and the New Testament had suffered from interpolation at the hands of the Jews and the Christians.

You have to have his spirit, not only to enter his kingdom, but also to understand his written word.

Nephi, for example, who is said to have written the first two books of the Book of Mormon and to have been part of the migration from Jerusalem, already knew all about Jesus: «For according to the words of the prophets, the Messiah cometh in six hundred years from the time that my father left Jerusalem; and according to the words of the prophets, and also the word of the angel of God, his name shall be Jesus Christ, the Son of God» (2 Nephi 25:19).

HUNDREDS of people WITNESSED it, and not only spread the word, but also wrote of it.

I also want to add, that I only wrote twice... my husband used my laptop to make his argument about the Irvings... those are not my words.

I think if God is as powerful as you say he is, that not only would he write his own word, but there would also be no question as to the correct interpretation.

Paul wrote: «Our gospel came to you not simply with words but also with power, with the Holy Spirit and deep conviction» (1 Thess 1:5).

In Oriental Mysticism, Altizer observes that Heidegger, also, maintains that being is not an eternal reality equitable with the sacred or God; rather, it is a historical event involved in the establishment of Dasein, human existence.2 Heidegger comments: «If I were to write a theology, which I am sometimes tempted to do, the word being would not be allowed to appear in it.

But it is also a human word: the human beings who wrote it were also true authors.8 The scriptures therefore share to some extent in the nature of the incarnation: they use human things as the means for God to communicate with us humanly.

P. 199) he writes: «In the beginning the creative Word - this Word that created all things, that created this intelligent design which is the cosmos - is also love.»

The word used in Hebrews 10:25 is also used in 2 Thessalonians 2:1 where Paul is writing about the ingathering of believers for the Day of the Lord, after which time we will spend eternity with Jesus.

Christians often argue that, as in human life the most adequate form of communication is by personal meeting rather than the written word, so God's fullest revelation also needed to be a human life.

As of yet no Intelligent design creationist has given anything but «faith» or «words» written down in a book equivalent to many other «holy» books with different and competing gods all throughout history that also have no verifiable evidence.

When Sojourners editor Jim Wallis writes words like the following, it becomes evident that he has decided for a stance that disregards political reality as we know it: «Biblical politics are invariably alien to the politics of the established regime and will also question the politics of the new regime that any revolution will eventually establish for itself.»

Well, God's written word is the truth as well and, insofar as a given doctrinal statement reflects the truth of God's word, the doctrinal statement is also the truth.

He also seems to think that if he can get every word written about it erased from the internet, that everyone will forget what they've read and will go back to applauding him for being Tony Jones.

Also, about your little book of fables, not a single eyewitness wrote a word in it.

Susanne — I wrote on this napkin that I am god, and the napkin also says that it is the word of god.

Let me write this again «RELIGION IS FAITH BASED» which not only means having faith in God but also having faith in that particular religions ability to properly interpret the Word of God.

Martin i have been thinking about what you said about craig martin and myself and often when i write i also feel the tears and i used to be embarrassed about that its not something guys usually do.But when it is the holy spirit working in our hearts he is prompting us because he cares whats going on in peoples lives we do nt these people but the holy spirit does and sometimes weeps for them because they are hurting he understands.So sometimes when i write its his words that i write so its as if he was speaking to them..

After all, we must remember that just as Bible translators let their own theology guide how they translate the Greek text, so also, the people who write Bible Dictionaries let their own theology guide how they define various Greek words.

Then he wrote the words which had come to me in all that King James translation glory in the bright daylight of the gallery: «For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.»

His religious difficulty came from the kind of theology he found around him, its habit of identifying words in a book (written by human hands and thought by human brains) with the words of God, also from the habit of playing fast and loose with the dangerously ambiguous concepts of omnipotence and omniscience, and taking these more seriously than any definite affirmation of the freedom of creatures to make decisions that are their own and not God's.

Inasmuch as many have taken in hand to set in order a narrative of those things which have been fulfilled among us, just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word delivered them to us, it seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write to you an orderly account, most excellent Theophilus, that you may know the certainty of those things in which you were instructed.

@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth of Christ, Your interpretation of God at His worst shows a complete lack of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts of the New Testament were written in as to date there are no original copies available.Greek was the common language of the day.Most of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»