If the claim is that man is
altering the climate then those proposing it must prove it.
Not exact matches
These models can
then be mapped against
climate forecasts to predict how phenology could shift in the future, painting a picture of landscapes in a world of warmer temperatures,
altered precipitation and humidity, and changes in cloud cover.
It is double speak for a
climate scientist to assert (correctly I might add) that natural variability like ENSO will
alter the TOA radiative imbalance through changes in clouds, humidity, evaporation, rainfall, ect., but
then out of the other side of the mouth imply that natural variability doesn't really matter to the multi-decadal projections.
What you have to remember is that if we are to have a positive impact that will ensure a future satbilised
climate then we must DRASTICALLY
alter our lifestyles.
This wasn't written by Naomi Klein or Bill McKibben — this was written in a report by Deutsche Bank: «If the world takes its
climate change commitments seriously,
then the dynamics of oil will be
altered beyond recognition.
In its turn, major deforestation could
then alter the regional
climate, particularly rain patterns, bringing drought.
If you can not match a
climate or weather event to CO2 with empirical measurements, not computer modeling which can be
altered to do anything you want,
then there is no basis for the AGW «theory».
If you ACTUALLY BELIEVE that it is «virtually certain» that human activities, primarily the increase in CO2 concentrations, is
altering the
climate in a measurable way,
then there's no other conclusion possible: you are a scientifically illiterate moron, with absolutely no concept of how even the simplest model of a planetary atmosphere works.
The most natural way to determine whether global warming is
altering tornado patterns is to look for changes in tornado statistics and
then see whether
climate models can explain those changes.
If
climate change
alters the earth's ecosystems and rainfall levels to the point that we can't rely on usual methods or locations for water and food supplies,
then that means food and water production will need to be the focus of clean tech.