Instead of seeing
alternate theories as competitive, he contends that «the organic molecules come from many sources.»
Those of us who criticize AGW supporters for running past the evidence on CO2 should not make the same mistake on cosmic rays, and movies such as The Global Warming Swindle have gone too far in portraying
this alternate theory as fact.
Not exact matches
If it's all just
alternate explanations that work with the evidence, I would much prefer people change their
theory to meet the facts (
as the Dalai Lama, for instance, recommends) than keep going with some simplistic idea of «faith».
Then I guess you will not mind the inclusion of the Flying Spaghetti Monster
as an
alternate theory, The tome has many PH. D.s that have recommended its inclusion in the debate if ID is accepted, such
as J. Simon PH.D., Prof Doud Shaw Ph. D., Afshin Beheshti, PH. D., and many more.
Yet, if I believe in string
theory, or
alternate realities, or
alternate universes I'm considered an intellect, Back during the Renaissance period they believed the same thing
as Mr. Nye here.
And yes, right wing extremists want to incorporate
Alternate Design
Theory into Evolution and insist it be taught
as SCIENCE!
But this film is not really about promoting an
alternate theory of authorship so much
as presenting an intriguing (if unlikely) scenario and seeing how it would play out.
Before 2016's Doctor Strange film, we had no idea if Marvel Studios would ever go
as far into its sci - fi and comic book concepts
as by introducing the
theory of the multiverse, of
alternate realities and dimensions and parallel universes that are living side - by - side with one another.
It's also quite confusing to follow for many viewers,
as alternate realities, paradoxes, and time traveling
theory aren't the sorts of things most people who loved Back to the Future spent a good deal of time exploring in their thoughts while watching it.
One truly has to wonder what
alternate reality Phil Shabecoff lives in, regarding his «crimes against humanity» comment at Gelbspan's post, which happens to be an insider's reference to Gelbspan's 2004 Boiling Point book chapter 3 title, «Criminals Against humanity,» which contains on page 51 Gelbspan's favorite phrase bit of so - called smoking gun evidence, the leaked memo phrase «reposition global warming
as theory rather than fact.»
You can spout «denial»
as much
as you like, but you seem like a smart guy and would know that science is advanced by exploring
alternate hypotheses, and proving or disproving these
alternate theories.
Science provides a lovely concept called the «null hypothesis» which serves quite well
as the
alternate theory in all cases.
Speculation regarding FSB involvement appeared previously in the Telegraph here (with
alternate whistleblower
theory pointed out by James Delingpole the next day here) and in the Independent here, where an IPCC executive was quoted
as supporting the
theory:
There is no actual empirical data to back up the blue line (in fact,
as we will see in the
alternate theories section, there is good empirical data that this blue band is wrong).
Starting with this prior, examine the paleo evidence, and treat everything that doesn't contradict it
as supporting that programme / «ruling
alternate theory».
The model of the billable hour decreases the impetus to make process improvements because in
theory the firm is paid the same amount regardless of outcome, but some of this value can be expected to be retained by the law firm through mechanisms
as bills being paid faster, repeat business, justification for higher rates,
alternate billing, and better delegation.