Not exact matches
An accepted comprehensive
theory is overthrown not primarily by discordant data but by an
alternative theory; we should visualize not a two - way confrontation
of theory and experiment, but a complex confrontation
of rival
theories and a
body of data
of varying degrees
of susceptibility to reinterpretation.
When the astronomical revolution
of the sixteenth century — in which the Italian philosophers
of the Renaissance played a far more important role than historians
of science admit — removed the universal cosmic clock, there were two
alternative ways open to physics and philosophy
of nature: either to retain the relational
theory of time and to hold with Bruno (Bruno 1879, p. 144) that «there are as many times as there are the stars» (tot tempora quot astra), since there is no
body possessing a privileged rotation motion, and the only
body which allegedly had it — the sphere
of the fixed stars — has been swept away; or to save the unity and homogeneity
of time by separating it from any particular motion — and this is what Newton did, anticipated in this respect by Isaac Barrow and, in particular, Gassendi.
The
theory behind it is that emptying your stomach and depriving
of the main energy source for a period
of time has your
body seeks out an
alternative or secondary energy source, which is stored fat.
But Darwin's
theory of evolution, like modern climate science, made sense
of a vast
body of observations that had no
alternative explanation: there was therefore a clash between disciplines.
Ah, denialists try to play being skeptical about the near two hundred year
body of literature that includes research into every posited
alternative hypothesis, when the issue is really their paranoid conspiracy
theory.
For me, that begins with people accepting that there is no hiding place left in the science — the overwhelming consensus
of the vast
body of scientists that study climate is that the trends we are seeing in the air, the oceans and in our ecosystems are entirely consistent with the
theory of global warming, while the
alternatives offered by sceptical scientists — even the much heralded role
of the Sun — so far fail that test.
I would research myself to find
alternative theories, as many have done before and proved wrong the «
body of qualified scientists».