Sentences with phrase «alternative climate theories»

A chemistry degree is not the same as atmospheric physics, and coming up with alternative climate theories requires specialist study.

nigelj: A chemistry degree is not the same as atmospheric physics, and coming up with alternative climate theories requires specialist study.

But I think you need to appreciate coming up with an alternative climate theory also requires pretty specialist knowledge and training.

They demand we offer an alternative climate theory.

Not exact matches

Suddenly, we seem to live in a time dominated by «fake news», «alternative facts», conspiracy theories, scepticism of scientific research, partial accounts parading as «the real truth which has hitherto been concealed from us, the people», revolts against allegedly smug academic elites and distant political elites — a time where YouTube videos claiming research into climate change to be a scam get far more viewers than videos presenting the science of climate change.

But Darwin's theory of evolution, like modern climate science, made sense of a vast body of observations that had no alternative explanation: there was therefore a clash between disciplines.

And consider climate change, where hundreds of research papers have been published on «alternative theories» for climate change.

If anyone objects to the theory of the climate, they can be invited to bring in their favorite story from mythology as an alternative.

Obviously the climate community thinks about alternative theories, but its just they are so obviously weak, they don't require endless investigation that goes on and on, like we get from the denialists.

Additionally, climate «skeptics» have yet to put forth a plausible, coherent, internally consistent alternative to challenge the robust man - made global warming theory.

Svensmark's cosmo - climatology theory of climate change is a strong contender as an alternative.

I think the main reason why alternative theories are not given much attention is because they are a threat to AGW theory and with the climate on hold for now mainstream will not budge unless and until the climate moves against them, and even then I expect further excuses.

See «An alternative theory of climate change» at: http://members.iinet.net.au/~alexandergbiggs.

The only thing to do is put forth alternative theories that will predict why / how the climate may change and see if they are correct and then proceed to the next step.

For me, that begins with people accepting that there is no hiding place left in the science — the overwhelming consensus of the vast body of scientists that study climate is that the trends we are seeing in the air, the oceans and in our ecosystems are entirely consistent with the theory of global warming, while the alternatives offered by sceptical scientists — even the much heralded role of the Sun — so far fail that test.

The Climate Misinformer database here at SkS is great, but each misinformer page looks more like a Gish Gallop (understandably) then the alternative theory the guy in question defends.

However, he is also very interested in climate science, and developed an alternative theory to the Milankovitch theory for explaining the glacial - interglacial transitions between «ice ages» and non-ice ages every 100,000 years or so.

But my impression is this is very speculative and as well as having to demonstrate and quantify the mechanisms involved for a significant GCR effect on climate, this hypothesis would requre finding serious flaws in a very well established and substaniated alternative theory.

The problem for climate science is that the second alternative, non linear climate forcings, can not be solved by current mathematics theory.

Many recent assaults on climate science and, more disturbingly, on climate scientists by climate change deniers are typically driven by special interests or dogma, not by an honest effortto provide an alternative theory that credibly satisfies the evidence.

Consider an alternative to your theory about why («skeptics») views on climate change reflect «innate» attributes to «correctly» perceive «collective deception»:

Many recent assaults on climate science and, more disturbingly, on climate scientists by climate change deniers are typically driven by special interests or dogma, not by an honest effort to provide an alternative theory that credibly satisfies the evidence.

The Climate Inquisition have no alternative theory that can explain the many lines of evidence that point to human caused global warming.

Together, these lines of evidence provide a conceptual and scientific backing to the theory of climate change caused by human greenhouse gas emissions that is simply absent for alternative theories, such as that there is no change or that the change is caused by something different.

It is easy to pronounce that the so - called deniers who are supposedly advocates of «denialism» are guilty of serious lapse in the understanding of AGW - climate change, whereas in fact they refuse to believe the hypotheses and theories that have been published in the academic papers and hold an alternative viewpoint.

In comparison, we do nt have an alternative and simple theory of climate change that can explain the pause, and be consistent with a pause, and «also» explain the 50 years of warming, and the specific characteristics of the warming, sea level rise, and numerous other data.

And just as there is no credible alternative theory to evolution, there is no credible model of Earth's climate other than the consensus model.

nj: In comparison, we do nt have an alternative and simple theory of climate change that can explain the pause, and be consistent with a pause, and «also» explain the 50 years of warming, and the specific characteristics of the warming, sea level rise, and numerous other data.