At the same time its regulatory policy should radically be altered, creating a level playing field for private enterprises wishing to introduce
alternative nuclear solutions.
Not exact matches
Re # 33 While using
nuclear explosions to solve the problem of AGW is almost certainly less political acceptable than the
alternative of building thousands of
nuclear power stations, it could produce a
solution that would be more effective if the situation becomes urgent.
So, the
nuclear solution is two decades away, and then they will risk being more expensive than
alternative which will reduce costs in the four decades between now and when new
nuclear power plants will still have two decades of debt service on labor costs for building
nuclear two to three decades earlier.
The
solution requires, as a first step, removing the impediments that are preventing
nuclear power from being a cost competitive
alternative to fossil fuels.
The Better Energy
Solutions for Tomorrow (BEST) Coalition and the Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel - led Clean Jobs Coalition argue efficiency and renewables offer a more sustainable
alternative to the
nuclear plants.
This also explains the climatological debate, US politics (its winner take all after all) and the fundamental disregard for proven
alternatives (such as
nuclear or molten salt
nuclear) to alleviate the problems ascribed in the ideology, if the
solutions (and faults) aren't part of the rhetorical structure they can not be true.
Nuclear Power at this point in time is the only practical
solution as an
alternative energy source.