I've seen a firm obtain a sizable banking client from several larger suitors by offering
alternative pricing scenarios for the work.
Not exact matches
The Bank's usual practice is to assume for our projection that oil
prices will remain stable and use our economic models to test
alternative scenarios.
EIA explores the impacts of
alternative assumptions about oil
prices in a low - oil -
price scenario and a high - oil -
price scenario.
Now, picture an
alternative scenario: You don't track purchase
prices, you hold 15 - 20 + stocks, and you Average In, Average Out.
Schiller is almost certainly correct in his predictions about the low likelihood of a crash in US bond
prices (although they're certainly going to fall) but you're welcome to base your investing strategy on some
alternative scenario although I wouldn't know what that would be.
Price of CO2 per ton (2005 $) in the RCP4.5
scenario, and the
alternative GCAM pathways with the same radiative forcing targets of RCPs 8.5, 6, and 2.6
The illustrious green movement who killed nuclear power in 1970s and brought about global warming by scrubbing shade - producing particulates from smokestacks and tailpipes are now bent on using a ginned up catastrophic climate change
scenario to keep the
price of oil elevated in order to keep the profit incentive alive for stupid expensive
alternatives like windmills and ethanol from corn.