Not exact matches
Unconscionable conduct (agrees with NFF that they have not provided protection and support reforms «to provide transparency in the supply chain» and recognise that «certain classes
of suppliers... are predisposed to suffering from a special disadvantage...»; misuse
of market power (
legal framework must «level the balance
of market power in negotiations...», «ensure transparency in the transmission
of market prices» and «not allow for final market risks to be borne by the primary producer» and provide «transparency
of contract processes» - specifically, Canegrowers supports effects test and a process giving ACCC greater power to «regulate anti-competitive behaviour and impose penalties», shifting «the decisions framework from the judicial system to a regulatory system» which would make it more accessible to small producers); collective bargaining (notes limits
of Sugar Industry Act (Qld); authorisation and notification approval costly and limited and not a viable
alternative - peak bodies should be able to «commence and progress collective bargaining with mills on behalf
of their members» and current threshold too restrictive)» competitive neutrality (mixed outcomes - perverse outcomes in the case
of natural monopolies - suggest remove «application
of competitive neutrality
provisions to natural monopoly essential
services»)
The Group's expansion plans included the
provision of legal services through an Alternative Business Structure (ABS) with the advent of the Legal Services Act rather than having to outsource such activi
legal services through an Alternative Business Structure (ABS) with the advent of the Legal Services Act rather than having to outsource such act
services through an
Alternative Business Structure (ABS) with the advent
of the
Legal Services Act rather than having to outsource such activi
Legal Services Act rather than having to outsource such act
Services Act rather than having to outsource such activities.
The development
of alternative legal providers and how they complement the
provision of legal services delivery.
The
Legal Services Board in its research note into the legal services market, published in August 2011, highlighted the advantages that alternative business structures (ABSs) would bring to the provision of legal serv
Legal Services Board in its research note into the legal services market, published in August 2011, highlighted the advantages that alternative business structures (ABSs) would bring to the provision of legal s
Services Board in its research note into the
legal services market, published in August 2011, highlighted the advantages that alternative business structures (ABSs) would bring to the provision of legal serv
legal services market, published in August 2011, highlighted the advantages that alternative business structures (ABSs) would bring to the provision of legal s
services market, published in August 2011, highlighted the advantages that
alternative business structures (ABSs) would bring to the
provision of legal serv
legal servicesservices.
Perlman, however, deliberately turns attention away from
alternative structures (as well as, without expressly mentioning them, the general concepts
of entity regulation and compliance - based / proactive regulation) in favor
of a focus on the
provision of legal services by individuals (rather than entities) who are not lawyers and by existing
legal service providers, notably «consumer facing automated document assembly companies.»
While there is nothing inherently objectionable in Perlman's proposals, his proposals do not address most
of the fundamental limitations on the
provision of legal services that
alternative structures address (access to capital, access to non-
legal expertise, the ability to offer holistic
services by combining
legal and non-
legal services,...).
Our business model includes the
provision of services that represent an
alternative to traditional
legal services, which subjects us to allegations
of UPL.
Previous subjects for research, often involving an international comparative element, have included the contracting
of criminal defence
services, innovation in civil
services including
alternative dispute resolution and a study
of legal aid that included looking at aspects
of provision in the Netherlands, Canada, Australia and the United States, published in A Strategy for Justice (published by LAG in 1992).
The judgment has refocused attention on the application
of LPP to partnerships between lawyers and accountants which may emerge once
provisions allowing
legal services to be offered through «alternative business structures» (or ABSs) under the Legal Services Act 2007 come into force, as anticipated for late
legal services to be offered through «alternative business structures» (or ABSs) under the Legal Services Act 2007 come into force, as anticipated for la
services to be offered through «
alternative business structures» (or ABSs) under the
Legal Services Act 2007 come into force, as anticipated for late
Legal Services Act 2007 come into force, as anticipated for la
Services Act 2007 come into force, as anticipated for late 2011.