(See Finlay Colville's
alternative view on this topic here - he argues that a shakeout in China would encourage more upgrading.)
Not exact matches
Most of the chapters, for example, seemed only to present the «Calvinist» or «Arminian»
views on certain
topics, thereby implying that Boyd and Eddy are either ignorant of the more moderate and mediate
views, or simply do not consider these
alternative perspectives worth mentioning.
Smacking children has been a hotly debated
topic for years and many have very strong
views on the subject, but an educational psychologist has spoken out recently with a judgement - free
alternative strategy to smacking.
Do you and the doctor have similar
views on topics such as circumcision, breastfeeding, immunizations,
alternative medicine, and parenting issues such as attachment parenting, co-sleeping, single parenthood, and daycare?
Apart from the fundamental scientific advances of the breakthrough papers, there is an hierarchy of classes of lesser papers, along the lines of those which — • Confirm or deny the main thrust of a breakthrough paper by arriving from other angles • Provide an
alternative or improvement to the main findings of breakthrough papers • Contribute more observation to the breakthrough paper and discuss its relevance • Seek to set a complementary base for a breakthrough in a related aspect of science • Report the
views of a clutch of authors about a
topic they deem to have political importance • Ditto for educational importance • Write papers that are knowingly lacking good science to place authors in one camp or another • Lambast an author or authors for being
on the «wrong» side of a polarised
topic • Perform meta analysis Etc..
For more
on this
topic, see here (for a counterpoint) and here (for an
alternative view to the counterpoint).