Not exact matches
Another claim frequently made about peer review is that it keeps out opposing
views, not just
on climate change but also things like
alternative medicine, creationism, all sorts of pseudo stuff.
An
alternative view, associated with Bjorn Lomborg, that it is agreed, places dealing with
climate change low
on the agenda, arises from comparing it with «other ways» of spending public money and suggests that they have higher social rates of return.
Consider an
alternative to your theory about why («skeptics»)
views on climate change reflect «innate» attributes to «correctly» perceive «collective deception»:
Rotten though the American legal system is, and despite the fact that most of these organizations do not agree with Steyn's
views on climate change (nor necessarily with Mann's either), amicus curiae briefs supporting Mark's position have been filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the Reporters» Committee for Press Freedom, the American Society of Newspaper Editors, the Associations of American Publishers and of
Alternative News Media (e.g. Village Voice), NBC Universal, Bloomberg, Time, USA Today, the Washington Post, and many other publications and groups.
«Clearly President Trump is relying
on alternative facts to inform his
views on climate change.