Losing weight is not
always about calorie intake but more about the way your body breaks down the foods you eat and how quickly.
It's
always about calories in and out, lifting heavy, or HIIT workouts.
Not exact matches
In answer to your questions I don't believe in counting
calories, as I explain in the food philosophy section as all these foods are so good for you and so easily digestible that you don't really need to think
about calories if you
always eat this way — you can't for example equate the
calories of an avocado and a chocolate bar!
I
always cared more
about nutrition labels and whether something was low -
calorie or low - fat.
There is
always a space for a dessert and I usually don't care
about the fats and
calories when I have any dessert.
What I serve up in my kitchen could be scaled back even further to include less
calories, less fat, and a whole lot less of a lot... but I have learned that less is not
always more when you're talking
about food.
For example, people at work who see me add cashew milk in my coffees in the morning almost
always ask me
about it, then, I can elaborate how much I love it, how it's lower in
calories compared to milk and cream, how it's healthier for you, and the list goes on.
Also, I've
always appreciated the transparency
about each menu item's
calorie count and nutritional information.
They
always disappear before lunchtime and nobody has a clue that there's
about 800 less
calories in the batch because I swapped in some Greek yogurt.
I have to admit, I don't
always care
about all the fat and
calories (I mean, have you seen my blog?!
I've
always had plenty of milk but I'm concerned
about not being able to take in enough
calories to support both a nursing toddler and a developing baby.
I wish I'd known
about these when I was trying to breastfeed my daughter, I
always struggled with the
calories issues and getting enough to eat.
In addition, restaurants are not
always open
about how their food is prepared and what ingredients are used, and restaurant meals tend to be
calorie - heavy, especially heavy on fats, salt and sugar, and less nutritious in general.
The diet we're talking
about is especially useful for people who want to maintain a relatively normal lifestyle (you know, not becoming The Crazy Dieter among your friends as you're
always obsessed with your
calorie counting and cherry - picking restaurants) and still get as lean as possible.
I had been previously pretty diligent
about calorie tracking (though not
always macros), but it really didn't pay any dividends in terms of weight loss.
Don't worry
about being labeled high maintenance,
always order your dressings and sauces on the side — that way you control how many extra
calories to add to your dish.
If your thoughts
about food have been dominated by
Calories and Fat Grams, then you've probably either been in a yo - yo weight pattern, or a gaining pattern, or you're
always hungry.
I
always have a stash of snacks in my desk at work and one of my favourites to have on - hand is the nut butter - filled energy bar which has considerably less sugar than the original energy bar, (although the same number of
calories — I should add that while I do have a predominantly sedentary job, I also run every day and regularly engage in other physical activity) only
about two teaspoons.
Type II is
always about too many
calories, ultimately.
It is
always important to check on the label for
calorie and sugar or salt content before you brag
about munching on the healthiest snack.
Similarly, the LCers
alway tout the day they ate 10,000
calories of fat, never
about the days they weren't very hungry and didn't eat much.
It's funny how nutritionists
always reference thermodynamics, drawn to as children to amusement parks, but physicists who spend decades studying thermodynamics never, never, never talk
about calories.
Because, as I
always say, weight gain isn't all
about calories.
Over-fat individuals get hungry while carrying around hundreds of thousands of
calories for the same reason eating less and exercising more almost
always fails... it's not
about calories!
If you're
always worried
about screwing up, if you obsess
about eating more than you should at every meal, if you're having a nervous breakdown because you can't find the
calorie amount of a certain food, you need to change your perspective.
Can't be sure though, but I have at least 4 times in the past IF - ed, lost my period, only to have it return within a month of the change I have often accounted for my period regularity in the past to non restrictive, high
calorie consumption during the fasting window, and
always gentle on myself
about the length the fasting window - not that I honestly over think it really.
Not
always about»
calories in,
calories out.»
First, despite what I am
about to write
about them, we must
always keep in mind that when speaking in terms of
calories, fats are the highest in that aspect among the three macronutrients.
There was this constant chatter in my head,
always tallying up
calories and
always thinking
about what I would eat next.
You can
always talk to your vet
about the best food, but make sure you choose something with plenty of
calories and fats, and other essentials for growing kittens.
What pet owners don't
always think
about is the number of
calories and the nutritional content in treats.
Google Fit, Google's activity platform, does a decent job of estimating
calorie burn with accelerometer and gyroscope data, but not
always accurately — in a jogging comparison between the Quartz and Fitbit Alta HR, for example,, the Quartz recorded
about 300
calories burned compared to the more accurate Alta's roughly 200.