Sentences with phrase «always about the numbers»

It's not always about numbers and statistics.

Fun is not always about numbers.

But debt isn't always about the numbers.

I see that he is diligent and careful and clear and discussions are always about the numbers.

Not exact matches

Think about this number because the rest of your life will be determined by your decision to keep a percentage of your income today so as to always have money for yourself in the future.

While a phone number is always a great idea, many consumers would rather contact a business through its website, especially if they are inquiring about a service.

The clients (and their internal bean counters) were always worried about the numbers - how many interviews had we done, how many were fully completed, how many customers were happy or unhappy.

When asked how the firm will measure success in its diversity efforts, Quinn says, «We always think about industrywide numbers.

In about 75 % + cases, when I have run the numbers for clients or friends, buying almost always makes more sense if you are going to live in the house for at least 3 years.

As soon as a GDP number of a large economy is reported, there is always a deluge of commentary about the supposed health (or lack thereof) of the economy concerned.

But imho guest blogging will always play a role with engaged blog authors — correct me if I'm wrong, but the kind of guest blogging you're talking about here refers to the kind of content marketing spam you quote in the beginning — resulting in a number of inbound links.

Whatever financial tools you end up applying for in the future as an owner in a business entity, it's always a good idea to do your own due diligence beforehand, gathering all the important information about your business, including the legal name, tax ID, address, revenues, number of employees, etc..

With the number of new binary options trading systems in the market growing at such a fast rate, the foremost consideration must always be about your personal safety.

As always, it is about how you extrapolate the numbers.

Rachel Newham, Founding director of Think Twice told Premier that while she isn't surprised by the spike in numbers, hearing about children as young as 10 thinking about taking their own life is «always shocking».

When I have led or participated in conversations in churches and Christian organizations about the desire and challenge to keep growing in both numbers and multiethnicity there is always a moment when someone throws up her hand to say, «But our doors are open to everyone!

What surprised me on this trip was that at every single event, one or two people would pull me aside and ask how I kept from getting discouraged by those big numbers that Mark Driscoll, and pastors like him, are always bragging about — the 10 million downloads, the enormous church planting network, the packed - out services, the hundreds of thousands of blog visitors.

«Another thing I don't like about some preaching,» said another layman who speaks for the growing number of his kind, «is that preachers are always on the defensive.

The Cold War Kids frontman and principal songwriter has always stood in the middle, so to speak, not capitulating to either side on a number of fronts: He's been upfront about his own spiritual pursuits even while eschewing conservative or fundamental beliefs.

Churches do many times get focused on self - preservation (numbers), but it should always be about personal growth.

If you're a big fan of onion rings from Burger King, you probably already know about the spicy dipping sauce offered from the world's number two burger chain (it's not always on the menu, and you usually have to request it).

I think as of today I will be able to jot down the correct date — it always takes me about two weeks to get used to the number - change.

I used a stand mixer but I'm always confused about what Low / Medium / High speed is since it's numbered 1 - 10.

corn did have better numbers all around but wasnt sure cuz peeps keeps making fuss about wheat is always better..

I've always been far too analytical about this sport (and most other things), and the numbers have simply informed my analytical ability.

When I started watching Landry's tape, I was really confused about why he spends so much time directly attacking a tackle as an edge rusher, but the more you watch, he always gets his hands straight into a guy's numbers, almost never allowing the lineman to dig into him first and get him off balance, and he uses a whole range of body motion with those hands to get linemen flat - footed and then expertly disengages and explodes after the ball.

Should this even be a topic?Giroud is a player of average quality always surrounded by good players.I just don't get.It's as if only Arsenal fans rate him.This was a player who was bought to be the leading striker at Arsenal and after his years of failure which many deny he's now become a super sub?How laughable is that.From failure to super sub.If the so called world class striker we're signing goes out with an injury for about five months who comes in then.It seems to me people lack vision.Why is it always Giroud Giroud Giroud?After so many seasons people are still debating what souldn't even be debatable.I've lost count of the number of times he's been talked about here.This is the problem with our club.It's just not ruthless.This is a player who should have been gone long ago but due to him being French he still gets the chances.We won't miss him when he goes and I'd like to see if he'd stand out in a smaller club.

Let's get real here.It is very unlikely that ANY professional player will ever say anything derogatory about a teammate that has just left the club.If Jack had said about Coq - «Grew up playing with him in the Youth Team and have fond memories of a player they though he had very limited ability he always gave his all.Very surprised and disappointed the club never invested in a World Class defensive midfielder that we have quite obviously been lacking for a number of seasons and would no doubt have improved the defensive weakness we have shown over a number of seasons» we would have echoed his thoughts entirely.If he had said about Theo - «A player who should have been so much better than he ended up being.He had everything needed to be a prolific player for our club but I can understand the fans frustrations with his continued lack - lustre performances and total lack of a football brain.I think this is best explained by the managers preference to play a player of such limited ability as Alex Iwobi in front of Theo pretty much says it all» we again would have all nodded our agreement.Although Jack never mentioned Alexis Sanchez I would imagine something along the lines of «If the Manager had not persisted with players with such limited ability such as Francis and Theo and instead bought the world class players needed into the club then Sanchez would still most likely be here.The fans must wonder what the hell goes on at the club as they pay fortunes for the privalage of following our club but it seems the millions generated ends up purchasing a new Texas Ranch for the Owner or in a yearly renumeration of # 9million pounds to our manager».

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

We as the Arsenal need to do our part in becoming a place where the highest dreams of players are realized, even if we don't always win trophies, we need to at least always have a «Genuine» fighting chance, Real Madrid went a number of seasons chasing La Decima, spent loads of cash, played second fiddle to Barca for a few seasons even but still players still dreamed of playing for them in that period, we as fans need to grow up too and stop bitching and whining especially about our players, we create a toxic atmosphere for these guys when we do so and it doesn't help nobody, little wonder our players perform better away than they do at home.

We have to sell at least 10 players before we even think about selling Santi, you give reference with Rosicky yeah we didn't get a lot from him and we don't expect a lot from him either, he was always injured anyway, and I don't there's any gunner who regretted keeping Rosicky for one more year, in fact I won't mind him retiring here, he was like a symbol of Arsenal and that's what Cazorla is now, beside he's not injury prone like rosicky, and age is just a number.

This is very interesting.I look at the number of striking options in our team and i wonder how Wenger will be signing a cf.However as i keep saying a cf is a need not a want.And needs are more important than wants.We have needed a World class cf since Robin Van P. Left.Just look at the feeling you get when you have a world class goalkeeper e.g Cech in the team.You feel relieved you know why?Its because the goalkeeper is very reliable, very talented and consistent.Imagine the feeling you would have when having a world class cf in the team.You feel very relieved you know why?its because the cf is very consistent, is super talented, will at most times finish off chances and will mostly create moments of magic.Arsenal need a world class cf so as to have that sense of reliability and to not put too much pressure on the midfield to always create chances for them.We neeed that consistency infront of goal to excel.Right now arsenal's centre forwards are very inconsistent, unreliable at most times and are not very clinical.We need a world class striker so that at least if the team is not performing he can take control and do something out of nothing.You need to understand the benefits of having a world class cf its not just about goals or talent but about being a leader of the attack, a strong scoring mentality and also the will to be consistent.World class cf's give your attack the ish factor.

Everyone knows we have problem but instead of complaining non-stop, why do nt we contribute more about how to solve the problem at hand — at least before the Jan transfer windows I do nt like AKB who keep defending Wenger even though he did make a number of major mistakes, but in this case it's not always his fault when anything goes wrong with AFC

11 February 2018 The days of goalkeepers always wearing the Number One shirt are long gone but there something not quite right about them wearing numbers 2 or 8.

Firmino's number change, the t - shirt shop copyright battle, the mere existence of Michael Owen, and there's always something brewing about the ticket prices being too damn high.

Embed from Getty Images Unlike their Premier League form, Arsenal's approach to this competition has always had a consistency about it and we can expect a number of youngsters to feature...

You get angry cuz I am right and you claim I'm not but that's to keep your image up as a loving person but your not it's all about number one and trust me when I say this guy's can be bad but women are always worse and deep down they know and use it but never admit it cuz they care what people think.

My 5 year old is always asking how big or tall things are, and me telling him a number followed by cm or metres doesn't really mean much yet, so we set about exploring measuring with this fun measuring activity.

The numbers coming out of the UK right now are atrocious (Dr. Amy did a recent post about that) and the Netherlands safety data is not the mythically fantastic numbers that people always compare homebirth to.

All out of hospital birth is always going to result in more dead babies than in hospital birth simply for the lack of immediate access to an operating room, but home birth with a CNM tends to only be about twice as risky, whereas, thanks to these numbers from MANA, we know that using a CPM makes it at least 4.5 times riskier.

Always spend time educating your child about the alphabet, numbers, animals, and others.

On BBC's «Hard talk» show in 2012, President Yoweri Museveni made similar reckless statement about the homosexual issue when he said «Homosexuals in small numbers have always existed on our part of Black Africa.

One more thing about stats — don't take absolute numbers too seriously, b / c stats always have a whiff of voodoo about them.

«The number crunchers were telling him that there was good evidence that the Tories» economic recovery was only going to work for a few people rather than for everyone — and that in an election about the cost of living, he would always have the upper hand.»

An Astorino adviser compared Cuomo's statement to presidential candidate Mitt Romney's damaging «47 percent» remark about the large number of voters he said are dependent on government and, therefore, always vote Democratic.

Chattam House recently came out with an information about the data used in analysis of investment pipelines for 2007 - 2013 and beyond and in that report, it was revealed that an adjusted number of China controlled mining assets in Africa could be even more impressive due to the fact that deals are not always made public.

«I have always insisted that we don't need more than 105 MPs and if you go to the Hansard, you'll find that that is about true because the number of parliamentarians who speak on the floor in a year will always be less than 120 people.

Christine Blower, general secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said: «While the NUT has had a number of policy differences with the Conservatives, particularly over «free schools», Michael Gove has always been open to discussion with the union about his plans.

Steve: What's really interesting is we are all always hearing about, you know, chimps and humans are 98.7 percent the same, 99 percent the same, whatever the number happens to be depending on how you do your sequences.

It shows that even with the most tightly knit basic rules, there will always be statements about sets or numbers that mathematics can neither verify nor disprove.