Sentences with phrase «always agree about»

While staff doesn't always agree about methods in the school they always agree about one thing — whatever is best for the kids.
I often remind clients that even when they lived together, they did not always agree about parenting strategies then either.
Couples who are divorcing or dissolving their civil partnership might not always agree about how much a business is worth, especially if only one partner has been involved in it.
He lets his mom take the reins on the client side, even though they don't always agree about the proper approach.
Docs do nt always agree about the usefulness of supplements, but the pills have an excellent safety record when used properly.
Due to the nature of their work, climate scientists know more than the rest of us — but even they don't always agree about the ways in which climate change will affect weather in specific places.
Conservatives don't always agree about raising new wealth and property taxes, but tend to do so about cutting the rate at which public spending is rising further.

Not exact matches

von Borries and Stefano agree that they are «always thinking about messaging.»
In fact, Ty always talks about how he believes borrowed capital should either increase ROI or add additional value to the business, or borrowing might not make sense (and I agree).
And I agree, it's not always about maximizing returns.
There was always a popular myth among foreign China bulls, and it still exists today to some extent, that any skepticism about the Chinese growth miracle marked you out as a misguided foreigner, because every relevant Chinese economist agreed fully with the ecstatic hype that the press and the sell - side were saying about China.
While economists can agree that trade liberalization benefits economies at the macro level, at the micro level there are always those who see welfare gains, and those whose immediate welfare is reduced as a result of the (necessary) changes in the economy brought about by greater overall efficiencies.
How about the government allows marriages for everyone and those marriages are performed always by JP's first and a church second and only when everyone agrees.
I am a Christian who attends a Pentecostal church, but I'm pretty liberal in my views as well and don't always agree with my fellow Christians about certain heavier topics.
Steven thanks for your testimony I agree with your view that homosexuality is not an orientation we are not born that way but its a choice.We can choose to live by what our flesh dictates or we can live by what God reveals through his word and by his holy spirit.If we are serious about following God we chose to follow him so it does nt matter whether gay or straight our choice is to follow God with all our heart.I have never been gay but have battled and was overcome by my fleshly desires not until i turned from them and asked the holy spirit to help me have i been changed for that i will always be grateful to the Lord.So in that sense we are no different our testimonys are important and are powerful.Thank you for your witness and may the Lord continue to use you as his vessel to touch lives and hearts for him.brentnz
And I agree and have often said «it has always been about faith, in what God has said»
I have always gotten a kick out the argument that if you don't agree with ME about what the bible means then it must be because you don't believe God or the bible.
You know nothing about Texas, I am always amazed how you people critize us for living in a tunnel, when it is usually libs like you that have not tolerance for anyone or anything unless they agree with your dribble!
Even when Dianna and I don't agree 100 %, Dianna always engages with kindness, intelligence, and respect, which is why I continue to read her blog religiously and why I'm especially excited about the February 10 release of her first book, Damaged Goods: New Perspectives on Christian Purity....
There is always something about other peoples religion that offends someone, especially IF it doesn't agree with theirs.
to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.
When Christians talk about what is and what is not sin, however, they do not always agree on these things.
The German - American thinker Eugen Rosenstock - Huessy agreed that speech is always a two - step, and that the listener's role is never merely receptive or passive: «Language is not [only] speech, it is a full circle from word to sound to perception to understanding to feeling, to memorizing, to acting, and back to the word about the act thus achieved.»
David: I would agree about the «griping» thing, and that is something I try to avoid but don't always succeed.
But for me, coming from a culture of independence, armed with a battalion of reasons why giving money to every person who asks is imprudent at best and destructive at worst, these conversations always leave me tense, my once genuine smile now forced as I agree to think about the request and then make my escape as quickly as possible.
There was one catch, though: Everyone had to agree about everything of consequence, which they almost always did.
Honestly, I've always thought Juice Press was overrated (and according to responses I got to an Instagram story about this, a lot of you guys seem to agree!).
We didn't always agree on which were the best, so the following is our good - natured argument about which tacos you should eat if you come to LA with a craving.
I am not a huge fan of green tea but I think I have had it a few times lately — I don't like coffee or regular tea — something about it doesn't agree with me but it isn't the caffeine — I always say that is why I need chocolate — for a caffeine hit
However, as much as I love the traditional chickpea hummus, it doesn't always agree with me, so I have to be mindful about how much of it I consume (which is a little hard to control sometimes, especially when it's a girls night in with nibbles (which always involves hummus!)
(Also, I totally agree with you about the freshly washed bedding... that first night in crisp, clean sheets is always the best!)
Excellent tips on hydration too — I pretty much always have water or sparkling water with me all the time and sip pretty frequently through the day — and I agree with you about the restrooms!!!
Lets take chelsea for example the team is set up to be defense minded so Matic always looks so good (he is good tho) i remember when Song was wit us a lot were complaining about his lack of discipline and how he was a bad DM buh suddenly he becomes a world beater at Westham.are we sure if we bring him back he will be d same?am not saying we do nt need a DM buh over streching d issue by saying getting a Dm will end all our defense problems is wot i cant agree wit a DM can not cover everythin it has to do with the whole team.dat is d secret of bousquet at barca.
@FFF — nice reply and on the whole I agree but as regards Walcott, whatever about his movement off the ball when he doesn't have it, but when he does have the ball his decision making has always been poor and his finishing in terms of % of chances taken is well below the level required for a top team.
Whether we're talking about who's better, Gerrard or Fabregas, or discussing which play was more batshit crazy, Paul Gascoigne or Eric Cantona, we like to drive our point home until the person listening to us HAS to agree with our point (because we are always right).
Your» e always on here shouting to the rafters about Wenger out and putting down people that don't agree with your brand of idiocy but you don't have anything worthwhile to say other than to berate people who don't want to think like you.
Agree about Ozil, but we have to remember he doesn't always turn up and there's no guarantee he would've today.
As much as I would like to hate your comment above I have to agree with what you've said here I know there are a hardcore of bloggers on here that will be derisory and downright insulting (Keyboard warriors are always really tough) but unless we have the two new additions we need then we will sadly be another fourth spot contender again, its as simple as that the current squad is nearly there but nearly there is not THERE and I hate to say it but I think its gonna be another case of Wenger stubbornly trying to convince the world he is a genius by winning things without spending much OR by lamenting the injury problems and bad refs and being desultory about big oil funded clubs while the Club we love turns a fat profit for the board and we see no silverware at all.
Kostantin, I always agree with your articles as it is the way i think about our beloved club.
Arsenal fans will certainly agree that a change in manager has probably been a long time coming, as few Chelsea fans will be too bothered about their regular chopping and changing as it seems to always spark new life into their players to go on and find a new level to their game and achieve big things again.
fully agree with the article, people always say our midfielders or «forwards» should be scoring more but the fact is that having a world class striker isn't just about adding more goals, its those crucial goals, the one's only a van persie, suarez, henry can score.
and i have always agreed with that statement, i am not the greatest wenger lover, but back then he was honest and trustworthy.so come on arsenal fans, let us join together on here for a change, and not give a fkuk about what other clubs and their fans and sympathisers like scholes says and writes, none of our business, scholes is making a living after all and paper does not refuse ink.
Some Arsenal fans will agree with the criticism that Merson often levels at the manager or the team in general or even at specific players like Mesut Ozil, but I for one feel that our former midfield star isd always looking for a negative spin about our club, so I was surprised to see a Metro report today in which Merson suggests that we are the right side and have what it takes to defy expectations this week and come away from the clash at high flying Man City with all three points.
One thing I've never quite understood about Wenger is his unwillingness to pay the slightest amount more than he believes a player is worth, now almost everyone would agree that Wenger has a phenomenal eye for talent but I've always felt he gets pushed out by a players price tag, maybe I'm unfairly blaming him and it's the board but if he does decide Benzema is the man to bring in, why not pay an extra # 5m or so to secure him?
Who cares anymore about what that obnoxious man thinks of or whether he agrees with someone like Arsene Wenger whom he has always disrespected!
Yes Kenny, I broadly agree but would give a slightly different emphasis to the argument you make about Spurs have always been a big club.
I agree with the points being made about not having had much time, but thats what defines good players from average players, a good player would always come in and make himself count on the park, i do nt know i have never really been a fan of eduardo..
Your coded comment on the size of Cockie's buff is reprehensible — any way — if you see see Terry's prehensile buff you would agree that it more than qualifies for Room 101 - not that I have seen it, personally, but VCC says he is always waving it about.
«I've always talked to the Nerazzurri about him going in June, they'll never agree to leave him in Argentina until December,» Zarate told the television station, as quoted by Football - Espana.
wallcot - bent toure - lescott (even with a giant forehead still can't score with it) almunia - robinson fabregas - modric vela - dos santos (mexican coach said vela I'm agreeing) rvp - keane chimbonda - sagna kaboul - clichy ade - berba Now matter who they buy they will always be in our shadow as 1 good win in the cc over 10 years is something we should never worry about untill they can win the league or fa cup or even qualify for the cl so there's only 1 team in london with great history and an even greater future.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z