Sentences with phrase «always change in the future»

I've done plant based vegan, fully raw, vegetarian, healthy, unhealthy, underweight, overweight and I'm aware that the way I eat may always change in the future so I try to be humble in what I currently believe to be «the best way to eat» and always relate it only to myself in terms of using the word «best.»

That can always change in the future, but it isn't their policy at the moment.

Although you may initially be happy with a Historic Third Ward renters insurance plan that is chosen, this could always change in the future.

Not exact matches

The focus on where the future is going is always focused on tech but the real challenge is talent and agility, which means keeping your people in a constant state of evolution, changing with your market quick enough to beat the trends.

Positive images of the future are regarded as the primary causal factor (although not always the exclusively dominant factor in a changing complex of causes) in cultural change.

As for me, I always self - publish my books (though that might change in the future) because traditional publishers would never allow me to give my books away for free, and right now, that is something I really enjoy doing with all the books I write.

As we reflect on the future of Protestantism it will not do to say that history is change, that the world is always coming to an end in the straightforward sense that today will become tomorrow.

In this changing political environment, the central and divisive issue is almost always the role and future of the nation.

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

First and foremost I want to commend Hafiz for his principles and clarity, he has always been true to himself and saw that nothing had changed with ARSENAL, while many, myself included start having hope of a brighter future, our players back in form, believing WENGER could change, at some point I admit dreaming we could make at least the CL semis.....

It's a risk, of course, as the party in charge making that change of rules may not always be the party in charge in the future.

On Sunday night Mr Corbyn backed a rule change that would ensure in the future either the leader or deputy leader is always a woman.

«One of the big challenges we always face in getting people engaged and take action on climate change is they keep thinking this is going to happen to someone else, somewhere else, or to someone in the future, far away,» said Susanne Moser, an independent social science researcher on climate change analyzing the project's results.

«There are so many variables that will affect the future of forests in northern Minnesota, forest managers will probably always have to deal with some amount of uncertainty,» said Stephen Handler, lead author of the vulnerability assessment and a climate change specialist with the Northern Institute for Applied Climate Science (NIACS).

I think I will change something in the upcoming future, but there'll be always the time for an update (right?)

There are some things that I would change in the future — just in the interest of always trying to be better — but overall I'm really happy with the way that it turned out.

Also it just occurred to me anytime I wear this shirt I have always chosen a nude cami to wear underneath, so perhaps in the future I should see how it goes with other colors to change it up a bit.

I am not a mom or a wife, and I hope this doesn't come accross the wrong way, and who knows maybe I will change my mind in the future and think I was naive or dumb to think this, but — it always digs at me a bit to hear someone describe themselves as just a wife or just a mom, although I do agree that between the two, there is a difference.

Also, the service is always changing and I am sure there will be more ways provided to better define your matches in the future: always be on the look out to fully use the features that the site provides.

With an ever changing line - up of shows, there is always likely to be something that catches your eye in the near future.

«Sunset Overdrive» is an always - changing, open - world shooter set in the not - so - distant future.

It sounds like we won't see the colonel return in any of the future MGS titles, but of course it can always change, if Kojima does find someone who is able to provide the voice for those characters.

Another issue that needs to be considered is the fact that Amazon can and will change its terms of service in the future, (as they always do) possibly making it harder to utilize the KDP Select program.

It is always a good idea to start saving in a personal account as well so that you can cope up with any financial changes that may affect your Canada mortgage status in the future.

I always feel inspired and empowered when I leave a classroom (with normally one of my rescued dogs in hand) and the kids see things differently; they see animals differently... they suddenly realize that animals need many of the same things that the kids need and feel the same feelings the kids feel... it is that change in understanding that is needed to change the future of animal welfare.

But in the future, well, the game is always changing.

- Link doesn't have much of a character in this game - they wanted players to relate to Link and play as themselves - Link's face doesn't have much expression in this game, and that was done on purpose - for Zelda games, the devs always try to make the player feel like Link - that was pushed even moreso for this entry - everytime a Zelda releases, Aonuma watches fan feedback and considers that for the future - the items Link uses to solve are always going to be important - regardless of the tech that Nintendo provides, exploration in the series is important - Link's growth through who he meets is also an important element of the franchise - Aonuma thought about Zelda freedom when considering Breath of the Wild, and was brought back to the days of the original Zelda - this was a big point of inspiration for Breath of the Wild - with Ocarina of Time 3D, Nintendo wanted to really utilize the 3D and had a desire to let players enjoy Ocarina of Time outside - the goal with A Link to the Past was creating more depth - Aonuma used to think that getting lost in a 3D world wasn't okay - this lead Aonuma to putting in tons of hints and guiding players - he has since changed that idea and convinced himself that it's okay to get lost - the first two years of development the devs created a game where just running around was fun - climbing is very important, because players can climb high and see destinations they want to visit - you can place your own markers to decide where you want to go - when the devs create a Zelda title, they consider not using the name Link - since they don't have anything else to go with, they choose Link - the name Link doesn't hold much value, since the player is the one creating the journey - when Nintendo first created Link, they wanted a character that is literally the link between people - that is why his name is Link - to think that the Zelda series has been around so long that there are all sorts of urban legends and myths makes Miyamoto really happy

Sunset Overdrive is an always changing, open - world game set in the not - so - distant future.

All in all the science of hurricanes does appear to be much more fun and interesting than the average climate change issue, as there is a debate, a «fight» between different hypothesis, predictions compared to near - future observations, and all that does not always get pre-eminence in the exchanges about models.

Protect these four places and the species» future will be reasonably secure, but the Okavango could always dry up in the event of climate change, the Selous is currently managed by sport hunters (a dying industry), the Serengeti is surrounded by a rapidly growing human population whose offtake of bushmeat is close to the tipping point, and, well, Kruger isn't in the most stable country on earth...

The terrestrial biosphere can respond slowly to large, regional - scale forcing, but may not always be in equilibrium with that forcing at any point in time, leading to subsequent commitments to significant future change for decades or centuries following stabilization of forcing.»

Show me your proof and I'll show you some historical records in Calif. that says it's always changing, and has been drier, wetter, hotter and colder in periods in the past, will be in the future, and all AGW agenda is going to accomplish is to destroy whatever monetary reserves this nation has left to cope with changing climate.

Through their statement on climate change, Buddhist leaders have crossed this boundary into an area in which, it seems to me, they lack knowledge both of the alleged problems of anthropogenic global warming and of the best policies that might be adopted to deal with an always uncertain future.

This is not to say that disasters will not occur; they always have occurred, and this will not change in the future.

«Whilst it is always important to think about the future in the light of changes we observe to the Earth's climate, in trying to draw conclusions so far ahead based on what we know, the IPCC scientists are speculating far beyond any reasonable scientific justification.»

The whole aerosol forcing thing was always a mess, will be interesting to see if the 20th century «forcing» used in future IPCC runs is adjusted in response to the SST change.

From predicting how technology will change the practice of law to examining innovations in billing practices, lawyers will always learn about the latest trends at Jordan's blogs and come away with new perspectives on the future of our profession and how we can improve our own practices.

I think you're right that most people will always try to hold a certain line on privacy, although I'm frankly not optimistic about technology's ability to protect those lines in future — I suspect our cultural definition of what is deemed acceptably accessible to public view will change, as the reality of a truly flat world emerges.

Calling all bright minds Regardless of how the practice of law changes in the future, law firms will always need energy, experience, skill and wisdom.

Underwriting guidelines and «sweet spots» are always changing, so after you become a client we will keep the savings coming by using Review and Reduce to lower your premiums in the future.

It should be noted that airlines and hotels aren't always as generous as they were to Mr. Beriss; often a change in plans means penalty fees and a credit towards future flights, not a refund.

This is a great question and maybe they should and there is always the chance that this policy will change sometime in the future.

If your needs change after you purchase the policy, adjustments can always be made in the future, but these decisions will at least provide a starting point for you to begin requesting vehicle insurance quotes from local and national providers.

Remember that, in a work climate where people can be expected to change jobs far more frequently than they did in earlier generations, it's important to maintain a positive and supportive network of professional references — which means that you should a) always leave an employer on a positive note; and b) do your best to maintain a cordial relationship with them just in case you might need them to serve as a reference for you in the future.

If it does change in the future, make sure to sign up to get email alerts in the future so we can keep you posted, or you can always come back to check this website page.

«As a nation of peoples, we don't always agree on the impacts of the past, and what we can do to change this in the future.

We like to think that we buy into a relationship and that's what we can expect in the future, but relationships are always changing because we are always changing.

Yes, the allocation of parental authority is always subject to change in the future.

«As always, there is uncertainty about future changes in interest rates,» Swift says.