Sentences with phrase «always change your goals»

You can always change your goals or change the path to achieving your goals.

Not exact matches

Regardless of the time crunch or changing conditions, Mike is always calm and keeps his end goal in sight.

«We are eliminating product sales goals because we want to make certain our customers have full confidence that our retail bankers are always focused on the best interests of customers,» CEO John Stumpf said in a statement about the change.

Despite the rate of expansion and organic growth always increasing, the goal of Sprouts never changes.

Giroud misses more than he hits, Walcott has NEVER delivered his expected talent, Welbeck will NEVER be the striker to score 20 goals a season Coqellin will NOT go a whole season injury or suspension free, Sanchez and Ozil WILL have down period during the season, all teams have these problems to a greater or lesser degree but most of the top teams will address these problems and players either inprove or are sold and replaced with better or at least more consistant players, NOT Wenger he keeps doing the same thing over and over with the same players and he expects a different result but gets the same outvome time and time again, yet its ALWAYS someone else's fault be it the Ref or the linesman or the opposition or bad luck or whatever and whoever and its NEVER the fact that HE has done nothing to change the situation and LOOKS LIKELY to not change it next time around.

100 % true King Henry was correct, Giroud must be 2nd choice striker to come on when we want to change our game plan, he's not good enough to lead us to the EPL because a premiership winning team always has a 20 league goals striker in their ranks!

Not last night though, we always knew our chances against Barca would be limited that is why Ox's miss was so frustrating as I believe that goal would have changed the whole atmosphere of the game.

As for how he performs, he's on and off, just like all the other players, but he has his clear weaknesses that he needs to change — like always hunting that next «norwich goal».

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..

We've changed probably over a hundred players since he is here, assistant - managers have changed, we've added a few new coaches, we've changed the head scout and we've bought two good strikers, yet we struggle for goals, we can not defend, we don't have any confidence and it's always somebody else's fault.

DETROIT — Adrian Peterson hasn't given up on his ultimate goal — «I always keep the mark at 25,» he'll often say, meaning a 2,500 - yard rushing season — but he quickly realized this offseason that the Vikings had changed their approach.

Other teams shoot given any half chance so get goals while we try to pass the ball into the goal looking for the perfect team goal witch fails 80 % of the time and opponents no exactly this will always be are game plan so they easily defend our never changing tactict

Podolski always gave everything... sometimes that wasn't alot but he gave everything, scored some great goals and, like eboue, was great in the changing room.

The facts are that there are always lots of goals against City, with the last 7 meetings averaging an amazing 4 goals per game, and Wenger certainly doesn't expect that to change tomorrow.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The problem with Arsenal has always been that every team knew our formation, we changed to 3 centre backs to stop leaking goals.

Change always feels right in the short term, but you shouldn't ever voluntarily change head coaches unless you know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you can not achieve your program's goals (whatever those might be) without hiring a new Change always feels right in the short term, but you shouldn't ever voluntarily change head coaches unless you know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you can not achieve your program's goals (whatever those might be) without hiring a new change head coaches unless you know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that you can not achieve your program's goals (whatever those might be) without hiring a new coach.

Secondly, Wenger needs to become far more flexible when it comes to his formation selections... remember this is the same individual that hadn't used a 3 - back system for 20 years and only conceded to the experiment when the proverbial shit hit the fan... you know it killed him to adopt «Conte's» system, which is probably why he resisted so long; in fact his stubbornness to adjust even earlier might have cost us the 4 hole... much like most sports that have tactical formations, every team should have a «base» offensive and defensive scheme, but they likewise need to have some inherent flexibility depending on the opposing teams tactics and / or when specific substitutions are made... how many times have you watched a Wenger - run team make a late substitution but not change their shape on the pitch... furthermore, how many times have you seen our team fail to make the necessary adjustments at halftime due to Wenger's tactical stubbronness, which often led to giving up goals in the early minutes of the second - half... the best teams in the world know how to make halftime adjustments whereas we always seem to be surprised when the opposing team throws a wrinkle into the mix following halftime... this my friend is soccer 101

It could be a cagey game but as always a goal can change everything.

Tottenham always concede cheap goals and it's not going to change.

One thing that was always thrown at Jones was that his team never won after going a goal down, i.e. that Jones wasn't tactically aware enough to change the course of games once they ran against him.

While I agree with professor Gere that «goals change all the time and what's important is ultimately whether the partner behaves in a considerate manner and supports one's goals,» I also believe know that, over time, partners don't always act in a considerate manner nor do once - supportive partners always stay supportive.

Our goal is always be responsive to our community, providing opportunities for people to have their voice heard, facilitate change where needed and help move our county forward with broader opportunities for all.»

«I was attracted to Gotham's mission to change the political landscape and the commitment of Brad, David, Bob, Diane and the rest of the team to always fight as hard as they can for the client and how they have been able to move mountains in achieving their goals», Rivera said.

«We always have breeding as a goal on the horizon, and are continuing to raise fish on land to examine other potential changes that a new environment might induce.»

In an article from MSU News, Dr. Luther Talbert, a spring wheat breeder in MSU's Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, states that «The goal of the spring wheat breeding program is try to be steps ahead of what's next... There are always pests and diseases, but climate and temperature changes are variable and hard to forecast.

I keep motivated by changing my phone's background picture to reflect my next goal, so it's always in my mind's eye!

I am going to keep on with the changes I have made because there is always a new goal and the rewards are priceless.

Please do just bear in mind that results will vary from person to person, but we always encourage our babes to give themselves the best chance possible to make real health changes and reach their health goals.

Make the exercise more difficult by changing up your foot positioning, and always strive to add more sets and reps. I also like to just shoot for a total rep goal — 100, 150, even 200 in a single session.

Neuroscience has now shed some light on why New Year's resolutions almost always fail and how to set goals scientifically for permanent change and results that last

We always keep our minds open to trying new ways to achieve our changing fitness goals.

External factors such as deadlines take some of the weight off your willpower by creating a structure for your goal, but the factors themselves are not always reliable and could change.

You don't have to stick to the same routines either, sometimes adding in an endurance session (more reps, less weight) can be beneficial, or you may want to increase your strength (less reps, more weight) especially if you have a goal to be able to do x amount of pull ups or push ups... Always keep in mind that your body needs to be constantly challenged for changes to occur (if you do something long enough your muscles adapt, if you don't change your routines regularly enough you can plateau.

But honestly, the road still continues, I have new challenges pop up as I grow and my body changes, and I am always setting new goals for myself.

A holistic nutritionist uses food or food - like items (herbs, supplements, etc.) to affect change, based on your goals, always bearing in mind the possible effects in other areas.

I'm always cognizant of a client's goals so that we can keep them on track while making changes that will give them the energy they desire.

Your goals are always changing.

They work on their own when the planned weight - loss is 5 - 10 percent of body weight and are always used in conjunction with other measures (weight - loss medications or bariatric surgery) if a more significant weight - loss is needed or when lifestyle changes by themselves did not achieve the medically required weight - loss goal.

If your goal is to always upgrade, one mustn't stop learning and trying other brands like GOSH which will definitely change your perspective in the makeup business and beauty routine.

Setting goals in my work always starts with wanting to operate in an ethical manner to promote sustainable change at school.

Although the structure and model may change and look different, the end goal has always been the same — student learning.

Dixon told Education World, «As the dynamics of our community change, we feel that we must always examine our mission, beliefs, and goals and make adaptations when necessary.»

As William Deresiewicz underscored in his recent book, Excellent Sheep: The Miseducation of the American Elite and the Way to a Meaningful Life, the goal of education should always be «to leverage learning as an agent of social change — the kind of objective that makes leadership and citizenship into something more than pretty words.»

School leaders expect and even encourage students to change their intentions; the point is to always have a goal, some larger purpose for getting through school.

With so many unmanageable and unpredictable variables, whole - school reform will always be tenuous, because it attempts to simply glide by many of the institutional constraints — the variety of programs operating within a school, all with different goals; the requirements of the administrators» and teacher unions» contracts — that make large - scale change so tortuous.

I think what No Child got absolutely wrong was this theory of change of being very tight on means and very loose on goals, for me that was always backwards.

My purpose in doing so, is to disrupt the assumption that change is always desirable, and to challenge educational leaders at all levels to think about why so much change and innovation falls short of its goals.

And while the editor's goal is always to improve the book, we understand this is a subjective process and authors may not always agree with the changes.

We always want to give you the best, easiest tools possible to get your eBook out there, and part of reaching that goal is making changes to the process to make it as painless as possible.