Sentences with phrase «always debate with»

Now, I will always debate with anyone the existence of god, it's fun and educating to me.

I'm always debating with my friend who is a skeptic about global warming.

Not exact matches

Sure, at debates, like last night's great one in Milwaukee, candidates are always asked questions that begin with, «As president, will you...» but we all know that presidents alone can't really do anything but put their socks on or, in more recent years, play a lot of golf.

AUSTRALIA»S immigration program is always well debated and ministerial consultations are held with a range of community organisations each year.

As the stock market began its ascent in the mid-1990s, executive pay — always the subject of heated debate — mounted along with it.

Instead of running ads, they would define Scheer more slowly, over time, with a series of forced choices in Parliament, through government motions, much as opposition parties usually seek to define governments (you'll note that «define» in Ottawa politics is almost always pejorative by implication) through clever use of their occasional opportunity to define a day's parliamentary debate through so - called «supply motions.»

As always, we debate potential «tail risks» associated with our views.

Where debate on the subject of religion versus secularism is concerned, it's always easy to find voices shrieking over the banishment of religion and Christianity from American life, and claims the nation is morally bankrupt because of the success progressives have had with marginalizing or outlawing religious practices.

Biblical debates will be with us always.

If there is a religious debate as arguement / it always ends with the religious groupings / in taking hands / praising the name of Jesus / or whomever having as an religious idol then as one turning their anger upon the poor atheist.

The entry point into the debate has varied, but there has always been an awareness in the Church that the search for visible unity and the communion the churches seek, is connected inextricably with the authority with which the Church interprets and lives up to its traditions, but also the way in which we act as Christians in the world.

That is why true religion is always in a debate with false religion, that is, for Kant, statutory religion.

But I do know this: Whenever I enter into discourse or debate or conversation, and I see the person as fundamentalist or Republican or homophobic or antagonist or (fill in the blank) rather than a human being with stories and ideas and passions, I almost always fail at being a promoter of unity.»

I am no Scholar but, I believe God has the power to change prophecy the way that he did with Hezekiah, his intentions for a perfect people in the beginning changed due to disobedience so who's to say our men or intended leadership has overall been disobedient, and many women have been forced to lead and in that leading women have been more obedient.We all need each other if my husband was a pastor and I'm his help mate if he for some reason can't teach or preach who else other than myself would be the closest to him.I don't believe GOD changes he's always the same but, he does have the power to make changes and he does not need our permission to do so, instead of debating back and forth over our version of the Bible we should be sure we have the Holy Spirit and real relationship with GOD because he will reveal to us his truths but, please know he's not the author of confusion

Jesus himself in gospel passages that I can not even count at this moment — argued and debated with people constantly about beliefs — whether that was in question format or conversation... but it always involved scripture and interpretation.

I definitely love to debate, discuss religious matters with just about anyone, always taking the devil's advocate's position.

I really don't see the issue with using a bright, simple, colorful tool when it's available and will help the good idea spread — ESPECIALLY when I am always willing to debate for long hours into the late night and early morning hours with people I don't know at all and who are hostile to my message and presence..

When Peter first penned the words «always be ready with an answer,» he was writing to the persecuted church during the time of the emperor Nero... This was not advice for a debate team; it was advice for martyrs!

i always feel so frustrated with the Christian POV of no, i understand that not everyone agrees on this issue, but it is encouraging to see actual conversation over the issues and not running into stone walls of unflinching refusal to debate.

I will always cherish what wenger did, however, thats the issue i am now debating wether he actually did make us great or was he blessed with the defence left by Greyham and the lucky signings such as Henry.

Personally, I have always liked to actually debate one on one — and of course with anyone else who is interested — with those who post thought provoking comments.

The 58 - year - old is always good for sparking debate with his selections, but ultimately he's picked out several star performers who were key in their side's successful results.

Should this even be a topic?Giroud is a player of average quality always surrounded by good players.I just don't get.It's as if only Arsenal fans rate him.This was a player who was bought to be the leading striker at Arsenal and after his years of failure which many deny he's now become a super sub?How laughable is that.From failure to super sub.If the so called world class striker we're signing goes out with an injury for about five months who comes in then.It seems to me people lack vision.Why is it always Giroud Giroud Giroud?After so many seasons people are still debating what souldn't even be debatable.I've lost count of the number of times he's been talked about here.This is the problem with our club.It's just not ruthless.This is a player who should have been gone long ago but due to him being French he still gets the chances.We won't miss him when he goes and I'd like to see if he'd stand out in a smaller club.

People are always questioning the commitment of players to their nations, with withdrawals from friendly squads at the forefront of the club vs. country debate.

@starghazzar, u would do wel to actually read what i wrote, he has no integrity because of the manner in which he wheeled away and played to the french crowd and afterwards showed no remorse but border line contempt when being interviewed, understandably you are well outside this debate but what you hav written is nonsense, it was ball to hand twice and since when did winning at any cost when your teams being outplayed become something to defend im a lifelong arsenal fan and irishman and while i will always appreciate what henry did while at arsenal any1 with a brain and objectivity will admit his actions since that handball hav exposed a lack of sportsmanship and integrity.....

I agree with you whole - heartedly, as long as it's respectful and never gets personal, feisty debate should always be welcomed.

- pragmatism debate that always surfaces with José.

It's free for IOS and iPad as well as for Android devices and it's probably geared towards those kids with a little bit more coordination and I mean there's obviously the whole debate you will always get into when we talk about these things of you know should kids even be playing and how young should they be playing and I'd say this is appropriate for what you think your kid is appropriate to be playing and if they has some coordination you'll probably do it.

When I facilitate workshops with midwives and students, there is always a lot of discussion and debate about professional responsibilities in the mother - midwife relationship.

And as has been widely discussed, CNN is still vetting the questions, so there's always a chance that we'll end up with the same Washington - consensus questions that dominate the regular debates.

«I have always lived my life with dignity, integrity and honesty; and I can say without hesitation that I brought those same characteristics everyday when I proposed bills, passed legislation, debated public policy, and fought tooth and nail to protect western New York on the floor of the New York State Senate for the past 38 years.»

He has always been fascinated by politics and debating and after reading physics at university (now there is a rarity) gained experience as a local councillor in Croydon, where he was born and lived, then at CCHQ in research and campaigning and working with the young George Osborne as well as Lynton Crosby and Michael Ashcroft.

I always assumed that the petitions site was designed initially to fob off the Lib Dems when they were in coalition, and then later to make people think they were being listened to by having a little debate with no power or influence that was always ignored.

Of the other leadership candidates, Yvette Cooper was first out of the traps to welcome the news, with a spokesman saying she «has always said she wanted to see the widest possible debate about future of the party in this contest».

Compare that with Parliament, which is always full of people, bustling about, seeking out and sometimes haranguing their elected representatives, accessing and engaging in modern democracy and observing vibrant, but often rough and tumble, debate.

The Miliband brothers were always encouraged to chip into the debate with their own opinions and, apparently, Tony Benn was even known to have given the brothers a few pointers with their homework.

I don't think there should be any subjects that, I know, religion tends to be kind of the elephant in the room very often, and when you start debating those kinds of things, but I'm always up for a conversation; which I think is the most important thing to remember, when you're having a discussion — with gigantic ironic quotes around it, a «conversation with someone» — is to make it a conversation, not falling into the trap of thinking the person you're talking to is an idiot, because they might believe something idiotic.

He says the debate over the list is beyond the institute's control: «It's a very useful list, but it is not always easy to carry all the other countries with you.

As someone with a first degree in biochemistry and an MA in theology, I am always fascinated by debates about...

Debating between a dress (but unfortunately it was too cold that day) or pants, I decided that since my eyes are always bigger than my stomach to go with my trusty leather pants.

I always debate trying something new but always end up with my same old thing.

There is always a huge debate on «what to wear with boyfriend jeans», at least this post cleared one thing what one can shoes one can wear with boyfriend jeans.

OK, well maybe this particular debate / battle / challenge won't take it's place in history like the aforementioned, but with animal prints always being a trendy touch to any ensemble (and in my opinion in any and every season), it is definitely one that weighs on my mind currently

Earlier titles or spinoffs like Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker dealt with the ethics of nuclear deterrence — or more specifically, whether nuclear deterrence could work without a human element to guide it (the debate being that, a human could always make the decision not to retaliate to a nuclear strike, out of fear of completely wiping out the human race, as opposed to an A.I., that would retaliate regardless).

This is a problem I've always had with Michael Moore «s documentaries as he seems only interested in preaching to the choir rather than exploring both sides of the debate.

The director adeptly addresses contemporary issues — the film was released one year after the long, heated debate on marriage equality in France — but always with a non-militant approach, choosing to convince through seduction.

Ex Machina could still power on through, with more theatres due once the Ultron hullabaloo dies down, and more international openings, too, including France on 3 June — whose audiences can always be relied on to prostrate themselves before Cartesian - debate - provoking robobabes.

Proving that it can always get worse, Wisconsin Senate Republicans have entered the debate on school accountability with a proposal, Senate Bill 1, even weaker than the bill proposed by their counterparts in the state Assembly.

I always enjoy a debate / discussion, but I don't engage people who start off with guns blazing, they always get worked up so easy, but thick people usually do haha

One thing that agents have insisted again and again in the debates is that industry professionals with any kind of credible reputation for a high standard of ethics will always make the best decisions for their clients.