Sentences with phrase «always do on the side»

When offering your baby food or something to drink, you can always do it on the side which is not favored by the baby.

All my investing happens in my free time and is something I have found time to always do on the side.

Not exact matches

«The biggest concern the regulators have is just that they don't want unsuspecting consumers to get caught up in something they're not familiar with, so they're always erring on the side of caution,» Stephen Innes, head of trading for Asia Pacific with Oanda Corp., said in a phone interview from Singapore.

All of this is being done while trying to simultaneously educate clients on both sides of its business about why anyone should get excited about yet another «paradigm shift» in an online space where someone's almost always hawking the next big thing.

So instead, AC did what they always do in live settings: noodle around on keyboards, make lots of yelping noises into echoe - y microphones and create extended instrumental soundscapes for the weird videos playing on the side screens.

The problem is that their «Jesus» doesn't ask them any hard questions; but is more like a child's «invisible friend» who is always on thier side whenever they find themselves in a conflict with others.

If that be the case then 2 Thessalonians doesn't conflict at all with 1 Thessalonians, And if that's what your particular experts based it on, then it does go to show that the experts are not always correct, and if they are not always correct, then your total assurance of the experts you side with may very well be misplaced.

On the other side the one who represents God is absolutely the wholly other, who can not be reduced at all to any religious or theological form whatever, who is always absolutely new and surprising, who does not cease to come in the «today» of his presence, who disturbs our ritual, morality, and piety.

I don't always come out on the side of the author but I always come closer to God — even if it's just to realize that I'm struggling with a particular truth Funny thing is, God always encourages me and loves me in my honesty.

Jesus came to save us all... Jesus is always on the side of the have nots,, I don't understand why conservative Christians are so conservative..

Just because evil is always relative does not mean we as humans can not see ourselves in others and share that with them, letting them know we can relate, that we feel the relative evil as well and attempt to support those in harms way by saying «I am you too, i'm on your side.»

The answer is simple: do the opposite of what catholics want because you can always expect to find them on the wrong side of any question regarding ethics and morals, especially if science is involved or it shows them to be evil.

For me I feel that Extremist on both side (s) have done their best as always to hyjack any and all debates.

I believe in a God who is always on the side of the marginalized, even when they don't have their theological ducts or social behavior in order.

And they can do so only by admitting outright that for such a pledge they want an amorphous «God» who is always and only on the side of the flag and the Republic for which it stands.

question by Sinsinawa Dominican Sister Erica Jordan, who not - so - subtly suggested that Ryan's approach to healthcare reform, tax reform, and welfare reform was in conflict with the Church's social teaching, the very Catholic Speaker replied that he completely agreed with Sister Erica that God is «always on the side of the poor and dispossessed»; the real question was, how do public officials, who are not God, create public policies that empower the poor and dispossessed to be not - poor and not - dispossessed?

There will always be times when we would prefer other modes of expression but we need to bear in mind that the liturgy is a duty laid on us by the Church, and not some individual devotion; we owe it to the Church to carry it out as obediently as we can, and put our own preferences to one side, as Newman did.

This is certain, that it must proceed from a cause that penetrates to the very centres of the sun and planets, without suffering the least diminution of its force; that operates not according to the quantity of the surfaces of the particles upon which it acts (as mechanical causes use to do), but according to the quantity of the solid matter which they contain, and propagates its virtue on all sides to immense distances, decreasing always as the inverse square of the distances....

And if I can turn the focus on the Beatles on to Christ's message, then that's what we're here to do... If the Beatles get on the side of Christ, which they always were, and let people know that, then maybe the churches won't be full, but there'll be a lot of Christians dancing in the dance halls.

We pronounce blessing on those who believe as we do and judgment on those who do not by the authority of God; but is that divine authority the authority by which Jesus spoke and taught: We believe that God is always on our side and not on the side of other; but is it not possible that God of Jesus may sometimes be on the side of other rather than on our side?

Because neighbors refuse to pass by on the other side, resistance does not always lead to martyrdom.

And so long it does, it will ALWAYS be lame, never comming to the satisfying answers, remaining always as a frame of a puzzle put together on all four sides, filled only few layers from the frame, yet the heart of it being missing, and never comming to understanding what it is the HEART of it, and what it's theme and purpoALWAYS be lame, never comming to the satisfying answers, remaining always as a frame of a puzzle put together on all four sides, filled only few layers from the frame, yet the heart of it being missing, and never comming to understanding what it is the HEART of it, and what it's theme and purpoalways as a frame of a puzzle put together on all four sides, filled only few layers from the frame, yet the heart of it being missing, and never comming to understanding what it is the HEART of it, and what it's theme and purpose is!

I've always been a huge crumble fan, even when I didn't like fruit or vegetables I still loved crumble — although I did quite often leave any larger pieces of fruit to one side and focus on the topping!

Salad isn't his thing, though he does always eat it, and if there are too many extra veggies in it, there is always a neat little pile on the side of his plate.

It is always so good to hear how he is doing, especially since he is living on the opposite side of Canada from us.

If you do make this tart, trust me on that layer of sugar, it enhances the taste of the corn, which always tends to go well when it's more on the sweet side of the taste spectrum!

The one trick with doing this is that bell peppers don't always have a good flat side to rest on so that they stay upright once filled.

I just love them for this time of year when we want to stay on the healthy side but still feel super indulgent, and I feel like chocolate + PB always gets that job done.

You were definitely paying attention as you ate those sandwiches... the thin layer of PBJ on one side, the thick layer with two jelly pockets on the other, the border and midline ridges of PB to stick to the other side so that it won't leak ANYWHERE when cut & packed... And never made the night before, always fresh in the morning... But did you know I can make them in my sleep at 6 AM?

To bring out its cheesy side, some salt (such as sea salt or soy sauce / tamari) always helps, and it does best on a background of other flavors.

We don't have good playmaker currently because he is always assigned on the left side and Cazorla is injured.

Bayley is Sasha's good side that always comes out when she's on the verge of success, but thinking back to NXT, Sasha remembers that being good did get her nowhere so she just knocks out her good side again (we see it as her punching Bayley).

JJ: «We are family and I will always be on your side if it does nt interfere with my business, even Stephen knows this.

On the plus side, projections don't always accurately capture young players progressing / prospects impact in the majors.

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..

Xhaka can not tackle which is amazing considering he is supposed to be a defensive midfielder, Ramsey lacks discipline which he has always done and regards himself as up there with Messi & Neymar which is he is nowhere near, both of them lack the athleticism which is necessary in their positions in today's game as could be seen from Sundays performance they were completely outplayed some fairly average players on the Liverpool side.

Most heard Grzegorz Krychowiak this summer and are rating him higher than the le Coq, but the stats which say le Coq is better than him don't mean a thing, come on guys, the grass is not always greener on the other side.

They have always been strong defensively but they are now really integrating all of their off - season acquisitions and it is doing wonders for them on the Offensive side of the ball.

Every sport book today is computerized, Back in my day money always moved the line if a player was respected, and if the squares tossed enough money on a game most books would move the line a little, However the big books would just sit and even take layoffs from the small stores, They knew even if the squares got hot in the end the juice would eat em up.Gone are the days when Billy Walters and his crew would move the line 3 and 4 points, I'm talking sides not totals, Forget about what they did to the horseshoe with totals in the NBA, Back then you could catch small non computerized stores with bad lines to begin with, imagine a three point move and the small store or corner bookie is off on the line a few points to begin with, I could catch some game with 6 and seven point advantages, with computers today if you can catch a half or one point advantage your lucky.Even if you know the group moving the line most of these store move the lines on air, when I say air they just watch the screen from D.B. And move the line before they even get hit, Hell even the big stores have the sharps on small limits per call.

Exactly, the ones who don't look like they have the weak mentality get sided out for no reason, Sanchez was scoring for fun when he was free to play in the centre and the wings, but he was outshining Giroud so the manager restricted him, Ramsey was scoring for fun when he was allowed to shoot outside the box and had players supporting him at the back but now the manager tells him to play Cazorla role instead, when Ox was new he was dribbling past City defenders for fun but then he was benched for Walcott who can't even dribble past one defender, now we have Campbell who always impresses on the pitch but the manager benches him for a player with no confidence.

«To be able to unwind and take your mind off of what's going on at the race track is something you really couldn't do outside of the race track, because there is always something happening on the team ownership side and it will swallow you up really fast if you let your guard down,» Harvick said.

Chucky is offensive all day, and vets on d... I always want d, when cooper was drafted I cursed and screamed as most band wagoners cheered, Williams was a sure thing along side Mack and now what do we have a guy that can't catch a cold.

It was a little adjustment, but I can always control what I do on this side of the floor, which is defense.

I don't blame the jesters but I blame myself for not having the powers to roll back the years to when my darling team was great, to when it was a pride being an arsenal fan was great, when after 90minutes we would have won a lost game and the bragging rights was always on the side of the die hard fans.but that was in the days when men were men and the queen was a follower.I hope such days will revisit arsenal.I now call on everybody that loves arsenal either as a worker or a follower to strive and bring back those days.Arsenal till I die.

We need this, sorry but wenger will never leave unless he finnish outside top 4, you can see in this match that we do nt have game plan, i do nt know what they do on training, they are just running from side to side with no plan, why wilshere get injuries, simple he makes stupid runs with no plan, he always get injured like this, same goes to ramsey, what happened to ramsey, last year he was our sun, now he looks like 3rd class player, i want Bergkamp on manager position!!!

Sanchez on the right further from the goal with enough space to explode forward in quick attack, Cazorla on the opposite side with room to man the Central Midfield like he has always done, opposite action from Sanchez... the two can interchange wings as they are both very apt from both wings, with a telepathic understanding with Sanchez more amenable to move the ball forward from the deep but Cazorla more amenable to defend from the deep.

I do think more should have been done in testing the Zagreb side, and reporters are always on the lookout for a bit of sensationalism.

However, another accusation labelled at our long serving manager is that he is always too focused on the creative and attacking side of the squad and does not do enough to make the Gunners hard to beat at the other end and in the centre of midfield.

Funny enough though Arsenal vs Man U is the only game all Chelsea, Lpool, Man City, hell even Spurs fans unite and have our backs, and what did my team do, crumble as always under very LITTLE pressure from a weak united side on the night.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits