Not exact matches
Then do we
always give
equal weight to our distant future experiences and to our present ones in terms of this calculus of self - interest?
From my own starter — I
always feed it with
equal parts * by
weight * of flour and water.
You might be able to lose a comparable amount of
weight through diet alone, but
weight does not
always equal fat.
While I am
always suspicious of new products that claim to improve on cap -
weighting (most have more to do with marketing than sound investment principles), I think
equal weighting may well be a superior way to invest in a sector with a small number of companies.
So the intensity of radiation (at some frequency and polarization) changes over distance, such that, in the direction the intensity is going, it is
always approaching the blackbody value (Planck function) for the local temperature; it approaches this quickly if the absorption cross section density is high; if the cross section density is very high and the temperature doesn't vary much over distance, the intensity may be nearly
equal to the Planck function for that location; otherwise its value is a
weighted average of the Planck function of local temperature extending back over the path in the direction it came from.
Because the PMDI
always calculates a probability -
weighted average of the wet and dry indices (27), the PDSI and PMDI will give
equal values in periods that are clearly wet or dry, but the PMDI will yield smoother transitions between wet and dry periods (25).