Sentences with phrase «always found answers»

Every time I come up with a new question or new problem with trying to get my little one to sleep through the night, I consult your book or website and always find an answer.

That's because, you can ALWAYS FIND THE ANSWER HERE.

Our vast digital library and virtual mentors ensure that learners will always find an answer to their questions.

Unfortunately, we do not always find an answer for the illness even with a post-mortem examination.

Steve Thomas, president and owner of Thomas Labs, which specializes in natural nutritional supplements and enzyme therapy for animals, says people don't always find the answers they're looking for in the vet's office.

Not exact matches

The answer is always to find what is interesting in what you want to remember.

The government's answer seems to be that if business owners find the new tax rules make saving inside their businesses unattractive, they can always pay themselves salaries, and save outside their companies in the same Registered Retirement Savings Plans and Tax - Free Savings Accounts available to individuals who earn salaries.

Founders always seem to appear as if they have all the answers, but if you find others you can trust and have honest conversations with, you'll find you're not the only one having challenges.»

The simple answer is always yes, but like any other resource, finding the right one depends on your implementation stage, your own expertise, and what's available in your geographic area.

«Their customer service representatives are always knowledgeable and quick to find the correct and accurate answer to their customers» questions,» according to one customer's 2017 review.

This is a question which is difficult to answer for Christians who always want to find some grace in tragedy.

Such many found cases the girls were forced convinced into marriage at younger age by their parents or family members if orphans and when girls were asked why the answer was always poverty and starvation were the common enemy for many nations and populations!?

The best answers are not always found in the certainty of any particular destination.

What theology always seeks it has always also already found; for the whole truth of man as opposed to partial questions and answers must always already be given if it is always to be questioned and found.

We shall find names and qualifiers for any theology, which should serve to remind us that theology is always human theology, always our word and thought, and therefore part of the problem, not the answer to that problem.

The answer is simple: do the opposite of what catholics want because you can always expect to find them on the wrong side of any question regarding ethics and morals, especially if science is involved or it shows them to be evil.

to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.

Here's a question that I always found difficult to answer for myself: Do you ever worry, as a well - educated American, that you're just out - sourcing the violence?

My own answer to this has always been, «When you wake up there you will be surprised to find who is absent.»

What I found was that always being ready with an answer didn't always work.

Over the years I have discussed this privately with bishops, always to find that the answers are, as it is inevitably said, complex.

I always feel like the more questions I get answered, the more questions I find, which gets overwhelming.

The answer, I think, is where we have always found new tales: in the older ones we have already been telling.

My last point and Im out... Throughout our great nations history... we always found a way to fight through national issues and come up with solutions... Giving the problems we have now to people in the 50's and 60's... and they may actually come up with a solution... if you earnestly care about making a change... start at the lowest levels of government... go do something... find out costs... expenses... how to get more health care to people... do things like that... quit waiting on the government to provide all the answers... its not the way this country was founded... and not the way we get through problems... If you or ur family does nt have insurance... get a job that can provide you that... instead of hoping the government will do so... If you or ur family lacks access to education... move to an area that excels at it... education is invaluable... Do something about your problem... and quit waiting for the next big lotto...

Ultimately people will continue to always question God's existence and role in our lives BUT it is we the faithful ones who are fortunate to believe and can find peace in our search for answers.

The answer, I believe, can be found (as always) in looking to Christ.

The answer lies in the application of the ontological principle, which says that»... the reasons for things are always to be found in the composite nature of definite actual entities.»

Answer: Chef Mark Reinfeld, who as the «30 - Minute Vegan» has a series of books filled with recipes that I've found are sure to come out right and always taste great.

That is because when you find someone more qualified you put them in that place and your answer to any questions about those moves is «it was always a temporary thing to get this off of the ground».

ANSWER: cuz they always find a way to disappoint!

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I didn't let what I found stop me seeking a professional opinion though, but it did help me find a few answers to questions while I waited for an appointment and we all know it's not always easy to see a GP as fast as you would like.

My hope has always been that the answers can be found everyday in each post that I write, as I focus on what I love, what brings me joy, and the blessings of family and a creative life.

Here you can find answers how to become both the best dad and father, and always keep peace and happiness in your family.

You can almost always find someone online with a quick answer or friendly ear.

But I have found that when I ask myself «do I need that or do I want that» the answers are always easy.

As always, don't hesitate to contact us if you can't find an answer you're looking for.

-- To which my husband always answers: «Yes, our kids watch it all day» — Not actually, I just finding it astonishing what folk think is okay to ask us but would nearly faint if we asked them the same sort of questions about their private lives and choices.

Like commenters and other answers have pointed out - you can always find examples where it doesn't seem to apply perfectly.

Joe is always very willing to find an answer in a short time frame.

«We found that the ICU may not always be the answer.

By finding that toxin molecules don't always stay where they are injected, Chapman says the Wisconsin study answers a long - standing question about mobility, but raises several more.

Both asking the right questions and finding the answers always excited her.

I was always interested in biology but found it too vague to answer questions precisely.

I've always enjoyed reading and when I started on my family's health journey many years ago, I poured through as many health books as I could get my hands on in order to try and find answers to the questions I had.

I found Virginia to be absolutely excellent, she was not only extremely knowledgeable but she went above and beyond, always on the other end of an email to answer any concerns or worries I had.

These are the questions you always wanted to ask and couldn't find the answers.

Though you can always google, sometimes, you may not find the satisfactory answer to your doubt, or it might take more than a few searches.

But I guess, as always, at the end of the day we can read all the articles and studies we want in order to find the answer, and although we do this, in order to move forward with the best information to make an informed decision, this in itself is a form of procrastination from real discovery, which is experience.

I spend a good deal of time researching natural living, but if I want a quick answer and a quick find, I always end up here.