Sentences with phrase «always have the answer to any question»

Only eggheads like you feel the need to always have answers to questions that are logical, try a little faith dude, you'll feel better.

Unsurprisingly, Chan learned this clever hack from the one person in everyone's life who seems to always have the answer to any question: his mom.

It also doubles as a mobile owner's manual, ensuring you always have the answer to any question on hand.

It also doubles as a mobile owners» manual, ensuring you always have the answer to any question on hand.

He was available when need and always had the answers to the questions I was asking.

Not exact matches

I always laugh at that question, because there are only two answers, either you're going to have an IPO or someone is going to buy it.

As Umpqua Bank CEO Ray Davis said in his book Leading Through Uncertainty, «I always tell our people that they're entitled to get answers to every question they have.

The first group just continued commuting to work as they always had, answering questions about their happiness levels, commute times, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion.

The researchers asked 122 students to answer that question the way they would in a job interview, getting answers including: «My inability not to be nice to co-workers» (ouch) and «I'm not always the best at staying organized.»

I have always felt that my colleagues and mentors are there to help me, answer any and all questions, and support me throughout my career journey.

That's always a hard question to answer in an environment where startups with zero revenues join the three - comma club, but the Huffington Post's unusual path presents a different set of difficulties to the would - be appraiser.

As you answer this question, think about what you have always wanted to see, feel and understand before your time on earth ends.

RICHARD FISHER: Well, I always concluded my speeches at the Fed saying, «And now, I'd be happy to avoid answering your questions.»

I can only tell you that he answers more than I asked for and ALWAYS spent more times to make sure I have all my questions answers and understood.

New hires always have a point of contact to answer any questions.

If you have pressing questions or need help understanding something, it's always better to have an expert available to provide those answers.

All example answers are taken from issued patents, but because the quality of issued patents is not always what one would hope for, these example answers have been modified and enhanced to better provide an illustrative response to the question presented.

We had an excellent experience with Laurie She was right on top of everything and was always available to answer any question we had, no matter what day of the week.

Having such a wide range of employees answering questions that are tweeted to @Twelpforce helps ensure that there's always someone with the right knowledge set available to respond.

We're focused on providing a first class customer experience and are always here to answer any questions you may have.

In addition, your Edward Jones financial advisor is always ready to answer any questions you might have about your portfolio or investing in general.

The best way to answer that question is to assume that the S&P had always traded at its current valuation, and calculate what it's historical return would have been on that assumption.

Unlike other lenders, our application process is simple and quick and we are always available to answer any questions you may have.

Why does the same science that rejects or supposedly debunks religion because of the preposterous idea of an almighty, all - knowing, always present creator, yet licks their lips at the thought of an ultra intelligent extra terrestrial with the capability to answer question break the laws of nature, have mind reading capabilities, so on and so forth?

If your broader point is that, unless evolutionists can answer every singly question thrown to them, you will resort to magic and believe in creator god, well, have fun, because there will always be unanswered questions.

Milosz does not answer this question in the poem, but his work as poet has always been to give voice to precisely this: all the sad, neglected stories of so many men and women.

The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for... doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance to change,» while reprimanding those who «give excessive importance to certain rules,» overemphasize «ecclesial rules,» believe that «doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior to others because they observe certain rules,» have «an answer for every question,» wish to «exercise a strict supervision over others» lives,» «long for a monolithic body of doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we give glory to God... simply by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on others like heartless judges, lording it over them and always trying to teach them lessons.»

The bottom line though is that for those that don't want to believe in the God who has revealed Himself through creation and His Word (the Bible) there will always be another question and never enough answers.

To say that it has always existed does nothing to answer that question, and only replaces honest inquiry with unsolvable complexity (also called nonsense); which is usually just a way of for one to be either lazy or ignorant and not keep searching for the actual explanatioTo say that it has always existed does nothing to answer that question, and only replaces honest inquiry with unsolvable complexity (also called nonsense); which is usually just a way of for one to be either lazy or ignorant and not keep searching for the actual explanatioto answer that question, and only replaces honest inquiry with unsolvable complexity (also called nonsense); which is usually just a way of for one to be either lazy or ignorant and not keep searching for the actual explanatioto be either lazy or ignorant and not keep searching for the actual explanation.

In either case, the questions will not always be easy to answer for someone who has not thought much about them before.

Young folks have also grown up with a ton of questions, but they aren't always looking for somebody to answer their questions.

I always begin to answer that question by emphasizing that although the answer is «No,» the real question is, «Have you believed in Jesus for eternal life?»

It isn't any more logical to say, with Aristotle, that the universe has simply always existed than it is to say that there's a Creator, Bertrand Russell's reply to the Jesuit philosopher Frederick Copleston — that there's no answer to this question — doesn't seem terribly satisfactory either.

Thus the particular question that has been at the heart of a lot of our religious liberty cases in the past few years — the question of whether institutions in the corporate form are entitled to religious liberty — is not a new question for our political tradition, and the answer that tradition has often offered it is not always friendly to the cause of contemporary traditionalists.

Indeed, ecclesial theology has always asked and tried to answer this question, at least when this theology has been personally responsible without emancipating itself from the Church and her faith.

What theology always seeks it has always also already found; for the whole truth of man as opposed to partial questions and answers must always already be given if it is always to be questioned and found.

The only slightly challenging question was about the First Great Awakening (Jonathan Edwards - if I had to write the name from memory, I would have likely answered wrong as I always want to say George Edwards... and Jonathan Whitefield).

always presupposes an answer to the question «What place do I have here?

The Right likes to pose the question in question but somehow the answers are always the same: Cheezes wants them to have all the money and the rest of us should shut up and die.

I live in NYC & often think of how vacuous & self absorbed this city is; but at the same time we always have an opportunity to answer the question: what would Jesus do??

However, Rice also notes that there was, and always has been, another side both to Calvin and the Reformed tradition — a side that was less confident in the intellect's ability to answer all questions — a side that could acknowledge ambiguity and be open to mystery at the heart of the faith — and that understood God to be immanent as well as transcendent, and one whose «dependability came not from being unchanging, but from being loving.»

Indeed, even if one begins with broadly epistemological considerations, as I have done here, one can only avoid asking and answering the question wherein the ontic correlate of such a noetic pole consists by a failure to be fully critical in taking account of what one always already presupposes.

To answer your question, yes, I have struggled with anger, and although I always thought my anger was justified at the time (anger is a reaction to something) I now regret it very mucTo answer your question, yes, I have struggled with anger, and although I always thought my anger was justified at the time (anger is a reaction to something) I now regret it very mucto something) I now regret it very much.

This process model of divine spacetime, projected from Whitehead's theory of interpoints and his critique of the Newtonian fallacy of «simple location,» slips into the logical difficulty with which process theology has accused traditional theism: It is always possible to ask whether any proposed empirical signs are signs of God, and it is never possible to provide empirical evidence with which to answer the question (1:42).

It has always been hard to answer life's deep and abiding questions.

Phrygian to me i sense that you are struggling with issues in your mind that you cant reconcile and these issues are affecting what you believe in your heart and therefore your faith in God.I had something similar happen to me recently regarding the story of the demon possessed man at one point the demons begged Jesus to cast them into the pigs does that mean that Jesus was implicated with the work of satan.It cast my mind into doubt and then i began to question who God is.I prayed and sort the holy spirit for an answer the answer i got was that Gods character never changes he is always holy righteous and sovereign why else would satan ask for his permission.So the answer was that he allowed satans purpose to prevail so that we can see that satans intention is always to destroy it may well have been that the pigs were his anyway.As they were for the gentile nations who offered the pigs to their demon Gods.Just as satan can not change who he is the destroyer the thief the liar God can not change who he is when we realise that despite what we see going on in the world God is still the same yesterday today and forever.The time is coming when those that have hurt others will be judged for there wickedness as we serve a holy and just God.Just as it was in the times of Noah so it is with this this generation that as the wickedness reachs its zenith then the Lord will return to judge the nations.He is coming again and we need to be ready it is not a time to be caught sleeping.brentnz

I've always viewed it as a lazy answer to hard questions.

There was almost always enough time to fix a broken fence, treat and stroke a sick animal, collect grain that had spilled in the field, tell an amusing story or answer the questions of an eager child.

Because this is the sole ideal that has the solidity once owned by Catholicism and the flexibility that this was never able to have, the only one that can always face the future and does not claim to determine it in any particular and contingent form, the only one that can resist criticism and represent for human society the point around which, in its frequent upheavals, in its continual oscillations, equilibrium is perpetually restored, so that when the question is heard whether liberty will enjoy what is known as the future, the answer must be that it has something better still: it has eternity.29

I have always answered my children honestly when they ask a question, and so I told Alex he had a condition that made it harder for him to socialise and learn new things.